Cases and analyses of proving the law university, legal case analysis, urgent !!

Law University? How do you compare it to?

1 If Ms. Jiang files a lawsuit, what are the types of damages that can be claimed? Explanation of the name of the project and the basis and preliminary determination of the amount of compensation for each item.

If Ms. Jiang files a lawsuit, the compensation items she can claim include: medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, accommodation expenses, hospital meal subsidies, and necessary nutrition expenses.

Legal basis: Interpretation of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Personal Injury Compensation Cases

This is a personal injury compensation case;

According to Article 136 of the General Principles of the Civil Law, the following limitation period is 1 year:

1) Claiming compensation for bodily injury;

Ms. Jiang has long since exceeded the statute of limitations from January '06 to now; Even if Zhang is sued on the grounds of rights protection, the court can accept it; However, there is no legal support for his claims.

The above comments are for your reference.

This is obviously an assignment!

Resolutely refuse to help others with their homework!

In the past, in order to write a question like this yesterday, it took me a week to go back and forth to the library n times! Do your homework.

1. Huang's conduct can hardly constitute a crime, and should be classified as negligence causing death. Because they are under the age of 16, they are not criminally responsible.

A's self-written will is partially valid because it does not leave a share for D.

The dying will is partially valid. , there should be a share of d.

B and D should be given a share of the estate, and since D is an incapacitated person, B should hold his share in escrow.

Legal basis: If the testator does not retain the share of the estate of the heir who lacks the ability to work and has no livelihood, when the estate is disposed of, the necessary inheritance shall be left for the heir, and the remaining part can be handled with reference to the distribution principle determined by the will.

1) Whether Huang's behavior constitutes a crime requires the public security traffic police department to make an accident determination first. According to the current description, there is no evidence to prove that Huang's conduct constituted a crime.

2) A's self-written will is valid before his oral will, and the oral will is invalid after oral statement, and A's oral will is valid before his death in the hospital. The Inheritance Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that an oral will must be witnessed by two or more witnesses.

and the heir is not one of the witnesses.

b gets a inheritance of $90,000, and other individuals have no inheritance if a has no other inheritance.

19.Construct a quadratic equation (a+b+c)x 2 - 2(a2+b 2+c 2)x + a 3+b 3+c 3) =0

a(x-a) 2 + b(x-b) 2 + c(x-c) 2 = 0

From a, b, c>0, we can see that the equation has an equal root only when a=b=c, and there is no real root in other cases.

Therefore, the discriminant <=0 can deduce the original inequality.

20.Proof|a+b|<|ab+1|, i.e., a 2 + b 2 < a 2 * b 2 + 1, i.e., (a 2-1) (b 2-1) > 0, a 2-1<0 and b 2-1<0 are known by the condition

Proven. 21.From the cosine theorem, cosa = 1 2 = b 2 + c 2-a 2) 2bc, sort it out and it comes out.

19.Equivalent to ab(a 2+b 2) 2 a 2b 2 is true due to a 2+b 2 2ab.

20.Equivalent to |a+b|<|1+ab|

Equivalent to |a+b|<1+ab

Equivalent to (a+1), (b+1)>0 and (a-1)(b-1)>0, this is certainly true.

Case 1 Question 1:

Paragraph 1 of Article 302 of the Contract Law stipulates that the carrier shall be liable for damages to the passenger during transportation, unless it is caused by the passenger's own health or the carrier proves that it was caused by the passenger's intention or gross negligence.

This exemption indicates that the carrier is not at fault for the passenger's person.

Therefore, the bus company should compensate Li for the medical expenses.

Article 303 of the Contract Law If the passenger's personal belongings are damaged or lost during transportation, and the carrier is at fault, it shall be liable for damages. In the event of damage or loss of checked baggage, the relevant provisions on cargo transportation shall apply.

The accident was obviously caused by Wang, and the carrier was not at fault, so the bus company should not compensate for the loss of the tableware carried by Li.

Question 2: Paragraph 2 of Article 302 of the Contract Law The provisions of the preceding paragraph apply to passengers without tickets who are exempt from tickets, hold preferential tickets, or are permitted by the carrier to board in accordance with the regulations.

Therefore, the bus company should compensate Zhang for the medical expenses.

Question 3: Except for the circumstances stipulated in Article 302 of the Contract Law, the bus company shall not be liable for compensation. It was thought that there was no contractual relationship between the passengers who did not have tickets and did not have permission, so the bus company did not compensate Chen for the medical expenses.

Prove whether there is a causal relationship between the death of the chick and the flight of the plane.

First of all, if you set environmental infringements, then you must first prove that the noise produced by the aircraft exceeds the standard, and then fly by, and the chick dies. The defendant has to prove that the death of the chick has nothing to do with the plane flying.

If it can't be proved that the sound of the plane flying over is beyond the standard, it is necessary to prove that the plane flew over and caused the death of the chicks.

No, in a lawsuit for infringement, the defendant should provide evidence, because you can't provide evidence, as long as the aircraft company provides evidence, and the ultra-low-altitude flight does not affect your chickens, it should not accompany you.