Why practice is the only criterion for testing truth

There is no need to test the truth.

If there are too many things that cannot be verified by human wisdom, will they not exist?

It's just an incomplete theory.

The reason for saying this is that truth is objective, it exists objectively, and will not change because of our subjective consciousness, and the standard of truth is also objective, after realizing this, we can understand whether the truth is correct through practice, which is a point of view of materialist philosophy, and only social practice can meet the test standard of truth.

01 People's cognition is obtained through practice, and many conjectures and inferences can only be tested based on certain practices, because truth has objective standards, and the best way to test whether objective substances exist is practice. It is a truth that can serve as a guide and serve us in our daily lives.

02 The test criterion of truth is to test whether our subjective understanding is consistent with objective reality and the degree of conformity, which is the basic proposition of Marxist philosophy on the criterion of truth, and it is also a sentence that many people who come into contact with Ma Zhe should understand in the enlightenment stage, this sentence introduces the practical point of view into our epistemology, which plays a very important role in the future development of philosophy, and is also a useful criterion for us to explore the world and understand the truth. This viewpoint can help us test the truth, emancipate our minds, get rid of superstition, and seek truth from facts, and play a great role in promoting the pursuit of objectively existing truth.

03 Any kind of truth should stand up to the test, only in this way can it have the objective attributes of truth, insist on advancing with the times, proceeding from reality, and realize the objective meaning of truth and lack of truth, so that we can apply the corresponding principle knowledge in daily life, philosophy can improve our thinking, and it is of great significance to complete things in life and establish a way of thinking.

Summary. Because practice is the only ** moral truth, moral truth can be carefully observed, practiced, experienced, and studied from practice to a conclusion. Practice can also help people gain experience in ethical learning, which allows them to deepen their understanding of morality.

In addition, practice can help us to better respond to ethical challenges, so that we can better practice ethics. Practice is the only criterion of moral truth because it helps us better understand, practice, and practice ethical norms.

Because practice is the only ** moral truth, moral truth can be carefully observed, practiced, experienced, and studied from practice, and finally a conclusion can be drawn. Practice can also help people gain experience in ethical learning, which allows them to deepen their understanding of morality. In addition, practice can also help us better cope with moral challenges and better practice ethics from Xiangsui.

Practice is the only criterion of moral truth, as it helps us to better understand, practice, and practice ethics.

Can you add, I don't quite understand it.

The implicit answer to this question is Marx. Peter Marx (1776-1837), a German philosopher and founder of Marxism, proposed that "practice is the only criterion for testing truth in a simple way". He believes that objective practice is the basic criterion for testing theories and ideas, and theories that are not objective are false.

The reason why practice can become the criterion of truth is determined by the nature of truth and the special delay of practice. First of all, from the perspective of the nature of truth, truth is the correct reflection of objective things and the laws of their development, and its nature lies in the consistency of subjectivity and objectivity. To test the truth is to test whether and to what extent people's subjective understanding is consistent with objective reality.

Therefore, its criterion can neither be the ideological theory itself, nor the objective thing, but can only be the bridge that connects the subjective and the objective - social practice. Second, judging from the characteristics of practice, it is an objective material activity for people to transform the world, and it has the characteristics of direct reality. When people follow a certain understanding to practice, they can lead to realistic results, turn subjective things into things that are not observant, and can compare objective results with subjective understanding.

In this sense, practice becomes the most fierce and impartial judge, with the highest authority.

Because only by verifying it with your own personal actions, can you know whether the truth is true or not, otherwise everything is just on paper, and through the test of practice, we can often understand what is true and right.

Practice is the knowledge of **, without practice, you can't blindly say that you have a specific understanding of this thing, after all, the knowledge obtained from books is the experience of the predecessors. In the same way, practice is the driving force for the development of understanding, because no matter what kind of theory, it needs to be constantly tested by practice before it can be proven.

When we call or say that practice is the only criterion for testing truth, we are actually saying that practice is the only criterion for testing the correctness of understanding. Whether or not human thinking has objective truth, and the truth that dialectical materialism says is an objective truth, so we should not go to the subjective realm to find out the understanding of truth, so only practice can complete the task of testing truth.

Practice is the only criterion for testing truth, and it is determined by the nature of truth and the characteristics of practice.

From the point of view of the nature of truth, truth is the correct reflection of objective things and the laws of their development, and his nature lies in the correspondence between subjectivity and objectivity. Neither the subjective nor the objective aspect can determine whether the knowledge is true or not.

Practice is the material activity of human beings to transform the objective world, and it is a dusty "bridge" that connects the subjective and the objective, and it not only has the character of universality, but also has the character of direct reality.

These characteristics and advantages of practice determine that only practice is the only criterion for testing truth.

Adhering to the standard of practice is of great practical significance to further deepening the reform. Only by adhering to the standards of practice can we truly uphold the party's ideological line, further break down the old ideological concepts and rules and regulations that shackle reform, emancipate our minds, and seek truth from facts. Only by firmly adhering to the standards of practice can we go deep into reality, respect the initiative of the masses, dare to hear and do, boldly innovate, and constantly explore and create various forms of public ownership that are conducive to the emancipation and development of the productive forces, as well as new forms that are conducive to the development of socialist democracy, and push the reform forward.

Only by adhering to the standards of practice can we constantly sum up experience, correct mistakes, and constantly improve reform in the practice of reform.

The objectivity of truth lies not only in the fact that the content of truth is objective, but also in the fact that the criterion of truth is also objective, and only practice is the objective criterion for testing whether knowledge has truthfulness. The fact that practice becomes the criterion for testing truth is determined by the nature of truth and the characteristics of practice. The criterion for testing the truth of knowledge should be to be able to link the subjective with the objective and compare them, so as to determine whether the understanding is in line with what the objective reality sells.

And the only thing that can meet this requirement is people's social practice. Therefore, only by testing whether people's understanding is consistent with objective reality through practice can the truth have objective certainty and withstand repeated tests. Only through practice can people directly compare and contrast the understanding that guides practice with the objective results produced by practice, so that the truth can obtain realistic evidence.

Analysis: The reason why practice is the only criterion for testing truth is determined by the nature of truth and the characteristics of practice.

First of all, from the perspective of the nature of truth, truth is the correct reflection of objective things and the laws of their development, and its nature lies in the consistency of subjectivity and objectivity. The so-called test of truth is to test whether and to what extent people's subjective understanding is consistent with objective reality. Therefore, it is necessary to compare and contrast subjective understanding with objective reality in order to determine whether it is true or not.

Subjective understanding itself cannot laugh at itself and claim that it is correct, and objective things themselves do not care whether they are right or wrong, that is, the criterion for testing the truth of knowledge can neither be ideological theory nor objective things, but can only be a bridge linking subjectivity and objectivity -- practice.

Second, from the point of view of the characteristics of practice, practice, as an objective material activity in which people actively transform the world of collisions, has the characteristics of direct reality and can turn subjective things into objective things. If the desired result is achieved in practice, and the knowledge is confirmed, it is called the knowledge of truth; If it fails, and it is not caused by something other than cognition, it is a false cognition.

This is determined by the nature of truth and the peculiarities of practice. Truth is the understanding that the subjective conforms to the objective, and in order to determine whether the subjective conforms to the objective, it is necessary to compare the subjective and the objective, which means that as the criterion of truth, it must have a special imitation point that connects the subjective and the objective.

It is impossible to find the criterion of truth within the scope of human subjective understanding, and it is impossible to test subjectivity with subjectivity and knowledge with understanding. Nor can objective things themselves be the criterion for testing truth, because objective things cannot compare subjective knowledge with themselves.

Selected textbooks. On August 27, 2019, the Ministry of Education held a press conference to introduce the work related to the compilation of textbooks for the three subjects of ordinary high schools. According to reports, the Chinese textbooks for high schools pay attention to the excellent traditional Chinese culture, revolutionary culture, advanced socialist culture and excellent foreign culture.

The Red Star News reporter also learned at the meeting that "Practice is the Only Criterion for Testing Truth" was selected as a Chinese textbook for ordinary high schools.

The Certainty and Uncertainty of Standards of Practice and Their Significance:

1) Practice is the only criterion for testing truth, and cannot be understood absolutely, but the criterion of practice is the unity of certainty and uncertainty, that is, the unity of absoluteness and relativity.

2) The certainty of the criterion of practice means that practice is the only objective criterion for testing truth, and there is no other objective criterion; Moreover, whether a certain theory or understanding is true or not, in the final analysis, will be determined by practice. Acknowledging the objectivity and uniqueness of the practice standard is also inevitably acknowledging the certainty of the practice standard. Denying that the standards of practice are indeed prudent will lead to idealism and agnosticism.

3) The uncertainty of practice standards refers to the fact that practice tests understanding as a process; At the same time, practice under certain conditions inevitably carries its own social and historical limitations. In this sense, the standards of practice are uncertain. Denying the uncertainty of the standards of practice will make people's thinking ossified and turn people's understanding into an absolutely immutable dogma.