Is there a right or wrong way to do things without breaking the law?

Of course, right and wrong are not only at the legal level, but also at the moral level. When it does not constitute a crime, it can also be morally criticized.

There is also a right and wrong way to do things without breaking the law. Although it will not be punished by the law, the feeling of guilt and remorse in the heart is like a shadow, and if you do something wrong, you may leave an indelible shadow and you will not be able to get over it for the rest of your life. Therefore, no matter what you do, it is right to be worthy of your heart without breaking the law.

Sometimes there is no absolute right or wrong, it's just a difference in the position or perspective from which the problem is viewed.

You can say yes, you can also say no, when you infringe or others feel that you have violated the interests of others, it is wrong in the eyes of others, and right or wrong is not what you do, but the person who bears it, and everyone has a different starting point and a different view. If a person thinks you're wrong, it's because he doesn't understand, and if many people think you're not doing it right, it's worth thinking about whether it needs to be corrected.

Not breaking the law is the premise, of course, many things will have right and wrong, and there will also be moral and ethical constraints. In fact, there are many times when you ask yourself that your heart is the clearest, do a thing, whether you are struggling in your own heart or are very calm, don't deceive yourself, you know best. Of course, there are times when right and wrong don't matter so much.

Don't look at it that important.

There are also rights and wrongs in doing things without breaking the law, and those that do not conform to social morality are wrong.

It's like studying, you study hard and get naughty, you don't break the law, but what you do can also distinguish between right and wrong.

Everyone makes mistakes, but not everyone sins. I think a crime is only committed if a person makes a mistake to such a magnitude that it is unacceptable to the public and the state. If you want to strictly distinguish between the two, then the serious wrongdoing stipulated by the criminal law is a crime, and there is no chain of mistakes stipulated by the criminal law, and attacking Hong is only intolerable by social morality.

What is wrong is not necessarily a crime; But since it is a crime, it must be wrong.

This is because the law itself regulates the bottom line of human behavior. Anyone who exceeds the bottom line of this legal norm is guilty of a crime.

This does not need to be exemplified. The people currently in prison are living examples.

Of course, there are also unjust cases, but those are exceptions.

Looking at things from different angles, right and wrong are different, but breaking the law is wrong from many angles.

Of course it's wrong, every country has laws and regulations, as long as things beyond the law are wrong, such as knowing that someone has committed a crime, but knowing that you don't report it and covering it up, although it is not your fault, but you have committed the crime of harboring.