The old man was dragged down by a dog leash and died, and the girl involved fled, why did experts sa

Because this incident can only be regarded as an accident, the girl does not meet the conditions for manslaughter, and the girl is still young and not old enough to bear criminal responsibility.

This was because the experts felt that it should have been an accident, not manslaughter, and that the girl was not old enough to be criminally responsible for manslaughter.

The most recent offence in connection with this incident is the crime of negligence causing death, and the starting age of criminal responsibility for negligent crimes is 16 years old, and the girl involved has not reached the age of criminal responsibility for negligent crimes. So it was an accident, but the girl was civilly liable.

Because the girl involved did not know that it was an old man who tripped over a dog leash at the time, there was no escape.

It should have been caused by a dog, and it has nothing to do with people, but if you escape, you don't dare to take responsibility.

Because this incident did not happen to the girl herself, it was just a consequence of an accident, so it did not constitute a crime.

Because the girl didn't mean it, she didn't know that doing so would trip the old man, it was purely an accident.

will not be sentenced, 12-year-old does not need to bear legal responsibility, but it is definitely necessary to compensate, after all, this incident led to the death of the elderly.

I think so, he caused the crime of intentional injury, and the suspect that after the accident, he did not stop the operation in time and provide corresponding help, and caused the complainant to stop the case of life, he will be punished.

Not sure, because this behavior is not intentional, it is an accident, and the specific situation needs to be judged on a case-by-case basis.

I feel that she will be sentenced, her dog tripped the old man, and within the range of his sight she did not help the old man call an ambulance, and the escape caused the old man's death, so she is also mainly responsible and will be sentenced.

No, because the girl who ran away was a minor. At best, she will be criticized for her education, and her guardian should compensate the elderly family.

The old man who tripped over a dog leash fell to the ground and died, but the hostess ran away, but she should not be sentenced. The hostess is definitely responsible, but at the moment the family of the deceased does not intend to pursue it, so the woman will not be sentenced.

This incident has been preliminarily judged to be an accident, so the girl will not be found guilty, but should bear the corresponding civil liability in accordance with the law.

Finally, from the moral point of view, the girl did not think of solving the problem after the incident, and even dialed 120, but chose to run away, without a certain sense of responsibility, it is bound to be condemned by morality, and if the dog is not in line with the regulations of Foshan City when the minor walks the dog alone, it should be led or carried by a person with full civil capacity, and there has been a great debate in the society on the issue of pet breeding. And the occurrence of this incident may trigger a new round of debate about the size of pets, hoping that pet owners can be responsible for their own pets and the safety of others.

The alleged girl has indeed committed a crime. Because if it weren't for the girl's negligence, this tragedy would not have happened.

Civil liability is required. After the girl saw the old man fall, she walked away without dealing with it as soon as possible, and she needs to be responsible.

constitutes a criminal offence. Because the little girl didn't kill the dog on a leash, and she wanted to hit and run.

It does not constitute a criminal act, and the death of the old man after being dragged down by the dog leash is an accident, but the girl did not lead the dog properly and caused such a consequence, and should be held civilly liable.

Because the little girl involved was not yet 16 years old and did not do it intentionally, this is not a crime, but she also bears certain civil liability.

Girls are not guilty of criminal acts. Because the girl was holding the dog leash at first, but the dog broke free from the dog leash because he wanted to chase another dog, which led to the tragedy of the old man tripped over the dog leash and died. The whole incident was caused by unforeseen reasons, so I felt that it was an unexpected event, and the girl did not need to bear criminal liability, but she had to bear civil liability.

I think girls actually have a certain responsibility, but as a minor, she doesn't understand a lot of things and needs to be guided by others. The dog should not be taken away without the owner's knowledge, and such a large dog should not be taken to frolic in public.

constitutes a crime. After the old man tripped over the dog leash, the girl involved chose to run away and did not choose to call the police, which has constituted the crime of escape, and the old man also died, constituting the crime of negligence causing death.

No, the police department ultimately decided that the little girl did not constitute a crime. Because the little girl didn't do it on purpose, and she didn't know that the old man tripped over the dog.

The girl involved has not been convicted for the time being, after all, she is only 13 years old and a minor; And this is also a negligent incident, not intentional, and the little girl has not yet committed a crime.

It does not constitute a crime, because the girl is not yet 16 years old and is a minor, but she also bears certain civil liability. After all, this tragedy is mainly due to girls.

The girl did not commit a crime because it did not occur as a result of the girl's subjective actions and therefore did not fall within the scope of the crime.