The old man tripped over a dog leash and died, how much responsibility does the dog owner have to pa

According to the investigation, it is another matter whether the owner of the pet dog knows that the little girl is not the owner of the pet dog. <>

As the saying goes, those who don't know are not guilty, so this matter depends on how much responsibility the dog owner needs to bear, it is completely to see whether the dog owner knows or is worthless, if it is because the little girl is playful and does not inform the dog owner to take the dog out, then the dog owner is completely unaware of the situation, including anything that happens outside, the dog owner does not know, so the dog owner does not need to take responsibility, although the dog is his, but the dog is not led out by the dog owner, Therefore, the owner of the dog does not need to be held liable, but needs the guardian of the little girl to bear the corresponding civil compensation. <>

But if the owner of the dog is aware of this incident, and he knows that his dog was led out by a 12-year-old girl and had an accident, then the dog owner needs to pay a certain amount of compensation for this matter. Because the state stipulates that minors are not allowed to walk their dogs, and they are walking their dogs alone. Therefore, as a dog owner, if he knows that his dog was led out by a 12-year-old girl and did not stop it, the dog owner needs to bear the corresponding responsibility for this matter.

After all, there would be no such thing without this dog, but in the final analysis, this matter is that the 12-year-old girl did not pull the dog tight, so this kind of accident happened, and the final compensation must be the guardian of the little girl. <>

Therefore, in our daily life, if we are also dog lovers, or if we have a pet dog at home, we must tie the dog leash when walking the dog, so as not to let the dog run to some places without its control, so as to avoid bringing some trouble to other citizens. And for some citizens who don't have dogs, when they see pets running around, they must try to avoid them and don't harm anyone.

So far, this incident has been characterized as an accident by the public security organs, and the dog owner does not need to bear any responsibility, but in fact, from a moral point of view, the dog owner and the girl who led the dog should bear a little responsibility.

Bear civil liability, compensate for economic losses, don't bear criminal liability, this dog owner is also quite wronged.

I think I have secondary responsibility, first of all, the dog is tethered to the owner at home, the little girl took the dog out to play without the consent of others, which tripped the old man to death, the main responsibility lies with the little girl's family, but the dog owner also has a dereliction of duty, did not take care of his dog.

According to Article 1245 of the Ming Code of China, if an animal is raised and causes injury to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability. However, it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party. The liability can be waived or reduced, but in this case, there is no intentional or gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, so the dog owner should bear all the tort liability.

Dog owners need to be fully responsible. Because dog owners have an obligation to take good care of their dogs, if the dog accidentally injures someone, the dog owner needs to take full responsibility.

Criminal liability is required. Because after the old man tripped and fell, the dog owner fled directly, and the old man died, which is a death caused by escape, and the sentence is relatively heavy.

The owner of the dog should be fully responsible for this incident, because the owner of the dog did not take good care of the dog, which led to the death of the old man.