Which is better, rule of law or benevolent governance?

I think that the two should be both rigid and soft, and the two complement each other. Teach the educated morality first, and at the same time the three chapters of the law, expressly prohibit, such as violating the order, know the reason first, that is, the morality taught before, and at the same time give corresponding punishment according to the situation, and it is best to have corresponding comfort or moral education after the punishment.

The rule of law is suitable for the current economic environment and the degree of civilization, and the rule of benevolence is suitable for the ideal communist society and the people's communes of the past.

In troubled times, we need to use heavy canons, and peaceful and prosperous times need to be benevolent.

For China, the rule of law is good, because in a country governed by the rule of law, you can get the same rights, the same dignity, equality before the law, respect and protection for the vulnerable, and so on.

Agree with what was said upstairs. The current pseudo-rule of law is not as good as that of the chairman.

But the Qingtian saint is hard to find, and only the legal system after the awakening of civil rights is the best. Top-down"Perfect"with"Reforms"It will never change that power is greater than law, and it will always be a pseudo-rule of law.

Whether the law is only good, or the rule of man, only the people live a sweeter life than honey

I suggest you take a look at Hugo's "Ninety-Three Years", I really can't say which one is better.

The most fundamental difference between benevolent governance and the rule of law is the difference between ethics and norms. The so-called morality does not recognize the law. Nor does the law recognize morality.

The similarities in the legal thought of the four schools of pre-Qin are all people-centered, emphasizing the relationship between people, and the differences are that Confucianism advocates benevolent governance, Legalism advocates the rule of law, Taoism advocates rule by virtue, and Mohism advocates the rule of the people.

Before Confucianism, nobles and scholars in ancient society received the traditional socialization education of the six virtues (wisdom, faith, sincerity, benevolence, righteousness, and loyalty), the six elements (filial piety, friendship, harmony, marriage, renunciation, and compassion), and the six arts (etiquette, music, archery, royalty, calligraphy, and mathematics) through "teachers" and "Confucianism". From the point of view of the content of teaching, social education in ancient China was completely based on the cultural elements such as values, habits, conventions, behavioral norms and norms formed by the Chinese nation in a specific living environment for a long time. Confucianism absorbed these cultural elements and rose to the level of systematic theory.

1. The meaning is different.

Legal system: The legal system in a narrow sense, which believes that the legal system is the legal system. Specifically, it refers to the laws and systems established by the social groups that hold political power according to their own will and through the power of the state.

The legal system in a broad sense refers to the principle and system that all participants in social relations strictly and equally enforce and abide by the law and act according to law.

Rule of man: A social system in which an individual or a small number of people grasp the public power of society for historical reasons, and use military, economic, political, legal, cultural, ethical and other material and spiritual means to exercise hierarchical rule over other members of society. The rule of man is a theory of governance advocated by Confucianism, which has long been regarded as an orthodox idea by feudal rulers.

Rule of Law: The rule of law is an important achievement of human political civilization and a basic framework of modern society. From the political system of a country to the words and deeds of individuals, they all need to operate within the framework of the rule of law.

For modern China, the integrated construction of a country under the rule of law, a society under the rule of law, and a society under the rule of law is the real rule of law.

The legal system comes from modern writer Ba Jin's "Writers Must Have Courage, Literature and Art Must Have a Legal System": "This shows that the promotion of democracy must stress two aspects, on the one hand, courage, and on the other hand, a sound legal system to ensure it. ”

The rule of man is from Mencius's "Mencius" during the Warring States period. Leaving Lou Shang": "Jun Ren is not benevolent, Jun is righteous and unjust, Jun is not unjust, and the country is determined by a righteous king".

Vernacular interpretation: the monarch is benevolent, and no one is unkind; Junism, no one is unjust; The monarch is right, and no one is not right. Once the monarch is put in order, the country is settled.

The rule of law comes from Yan Zi's "Yan Zi Spring and Autumn Period: Admonition on the Nineth" in the Spring and Autumn Period: "In the past, the land of the former monarch Huan Gong was narrower than the present, and the rule of law was cultivated, and politics and religion were broadened to dominate the princes." Vernacular Interpretation:

The land ruled by the original monarch Huan Gong was smaller than today, but he rectified the rule of the law and expanded politics and education, so he dominated the princes.

Yi Zhongtian: The difference between "legal system" and "rule of law"!

The rule of law is to govern the country according to the law, and the rule of man is to govern the country by relying on people's ideas.

At its core, the rule of law is about limiting state power and protecting citizens' rights. The core of the rule of man is to infinitely expand the personal power of the ruler and limit the rights of citizens.

Thank you for adopting.

The main difference could be:

The rule of law is generally unforgiving.

And the rule of man is often self-sensitive.

The rule of law is the use of law to bind human behavior.

The rule of man is to restrain people's behavior with personal joys, angers, sorrows, and sorrows.

The difference is that the judgment of the law is recognized by the public, and the joys and sorrows of individuals are only personal acts and are not popular with the people.

The rule of law means that there is a law to follow, violations must be prosecuted, and more importantly, there is a law to follow. The reason why there is a law that must be followed is rarely mentioned in ordinary times, because it is difficult to achieve 100% legal system.

The rule of man refers to the intervention of man beyond the enforcement of the law. The rule of man is divided into two situations, one is that the law is not followed, the law is not strictly enforced, and the law is not prosecuted. The other situation is that there is no way to follow, and the chief is conscious.

Generally speaking, the rule of man is a very serious problem, which makes people feel deeply disgusted, but they are helpless, and they often need to rise up and struggle before they can hope for improvement.

The rule of law is objective, and the rule of public is governed by individuals with personal pleasures and limitations.