The 845 main version is good for FX5200 and 9550 games

The architecture of the 5200 itself lags behind the 9550. The 5200 can be considered the DX440 version of the MX9. Aside from hardware support for the DX9, its performance is similar to that of the MX440.

The 9550 is a 3rd generation more advanced architecture than the MX440, and its resource utilization is much higher than that of the 5200 with the same bandwidth and video memory. 5200 3DMark2001 is basically 4000 5000 points, while 9550 is above 8000. 3DMark2001 is based on DX8 tests, and the 9550 is much stronger than the 5200.

In DX9-based testing, the gap between the two is even greater because the 5200's architecture is more unadaptable.

Due to the rules of the thrift market, the ** of low-end products is generally about the same. Neither 9550 nor 5200 is more than 200, which is basically the same. So, just go for 9550.

The general rule stated on the ground floor is correct. But the architecture of the 5200 is much worse than that of the 9550 (only two of the four render pipelines of the 5200 support DX9, and the other two only support DX7 - the same pipeline as the MX440, which is the main basis for thinking that 5200 is the DX9 version of the MX440). Whether it is DX performance or OpenGL performance, the 9550 is much stronger than the 5200.

Although the 5200 supports DX9, it can't actually run DX9 games at all.

Before ATI out of the 9 series graphics card, ATI drivers are really not good, which is also the main reason for limiting ATI market share, since the 9 series graphics cards, ATI attaches great importance to drivers, and now new drivers are launched every month, and now ATI graphics card drivers are no worse than NVIDIA.

If you use 9550, pay attention to whether your power supply can be afforded.

Needless to say, 9550 is good because it is a card

I recommend G card to play games,A card is suitable for drawing work。

9550 is a little later than the 5200 of the destroyer source The technology is slightly higher.

845 has support for 8x, how can it not be supported.

My machine is a P4 micro 845E motherboard (only supports DDR266 and APG4X, and the one for AGP8X is 845PE) Memory 1G Graphics Card 9550 Playing Warcraft and WOW is not a big mistake, I used to play when the memory was 512M, and I upgraded the 1G memory to change the 6600GT graphics card to play Battlefield 2

Needless to say, FX5200 and 9550 speed are not at the same level at all, FX5200 is almost the same as 9550 special effects, everything else is rubbish, but FX5200 is enough to play Warcraft and WOW, WOW may be slightly worse, Warcraft must be enough, my first Xianling Zhiran card was MX440 to play Warcraft.

There is also the difference between AGP4X and APG8X.

Memory is important.

9550.Quite obviously, the 5200 is definitely not as good as the 9550, the CPU and memory are a little higher, and the workmanship is not the same. Heat dissipation problems9550 is better than 5200, 5200 will crash after running large games for a long time, and it doesn't even support some large games.

9550 is recommended, but let's be honest. That is, these 2 comparisons, 9550 is okay, if it is too far from the X series of Class A boards.

The performance of the 9550 far exceeds that of the 5200, and as long as the CPU is enough, it can basically run most of the current 3D games. 5200 no.

Although I also use 5200.

But 9550 is still recommended

5200 is garbage, 3D running score is only more than 1,000, sometimes only a few hundred points, 9550 should be more than 5200

However, if you don't want to change too much.

It is recommended to change the board to 865 and at least the interface to 8x.

9550 good.

Absolutely no need to discuss.

The 5200 is just a bit better than the MX4.

Barely support d9

The performance of the 9550 is several times that of the 5200.

But for 4x.

It could be a bottleneck.

The motherboard of INRL845 is the highest Ben 4, and most of them are Ben 4.

This configuration is too old, the last FX5200 is enough, the second-hand contempt under the "HNJB163" recommended 6800GT, INTL845 The whole series only supports AGP 4X, and most of the 845 motherboards are Ben Si Rise to some or race 4, what is the significance of the last 8X 6800GT stove + electric tiger? Not to mention the ** and the power belt does not move!

This configuration is very old, and it is enough to add a GF2XM400-FX5200 movie with the effect of ***, don't expect to play big games.

Back to "ZRZ285" Have you seen the AGP version of the 9500GT? Also 8600gt....It's an 845 board, not a P41 board.

The old motherboard, depending on your power supply and CPU limitations, the CPU of the Pentium 4 is already the limit if the power supply is enough. You'd better report the host to buy a graphics card, install it and try it, it is estimated that the 9500GT is not easy, and the power supply is also a problem. If you can't take the 9500GT, the 8600GT can also be used.

If it doesn't work, don't change it, no matter how bad the graphics card is, there is no need to change it.

Now the game agp few graphics cards can afford to run even if the graphics card can The performance of other hardware will be slowed down Or upgrade all of them If you really want to get a graphics card You can get a 2-hand 5200 80 yuan less than play war3

Obsolete goods, no graphics card is suitable for playing games! Let's upgrade them all!

9550 should be similar to 5700, so if you choose 5200 and 9550, of course, choose ATI's 9550, don't choose miscellaneous graphics cards, although the chips are the same, the memory performance of miscellaneous brands is not good.

Don't look at the brand, look at the workmanship.

Install 9550, stronger than 5200, look at Shuangmin's 9550 series, the quality is not bad in all aspects.

In fact, I don't think there's any need to change the graphics card, 9550 is not much stronger than MX440, it's better to deal with it first.

Swap them all out in the future.

9550, of course.

GeForceFX5200, not to mention the low-end 5200, the entire 5 series is a failure, and it is a painful memory for NVIDIA.

In the DX8 game, the 5600 and even the later 5700 can't outrun the previous generation of the Ti4200, and in the DX9, almost all of them are defeated by the ATI

9550 uses the same rv350 core as 9600, using micron process + low K technology, the core can almost exceed the level of 9600Pro+, the later 9550 makes a big fuss about the video memory, and many products can exceed or even exceed the level of 9600XT. It is the best value low-end graphics card in 04.

The 3 machines I installed for my classmates all use 9550, and the cores can all exceed 400, two 420, and the score of one is more than 8,000 by default, and it exceeds the last 10,000.

Basically, there are more users in the second-hand market who choose 9550 to upgrade, because 9550 can be overclocked to the level of 9600Pro by flashing BIOS, which is 5200 can not reach the drop.

The 9550 is very good, even if it is a double 128, it is better than the 5200.

The 9550's competitor is around the 6200A.

Is there a driver for FX5200 that is deleted and then installed on the driver of R9550? The R9550 is definitely better than the FX5200, unless your 9550 is bored and uses GPU-Z to see its specific parameters.

Delete the driver first, and then install a new one, otherwise the driver will conflict.

Under this omega drive.

100% is a graphics driver issue. The R9550 is definitely better than the FX5200.

Generally speaking, it's impossible, otherwise it's incompatible, or the driver is not good, if the first two are good, then you have to reinstall the system to see if it's generally fine, you try it.