Regarding the death of the old man after tripping over a dog leash, is the dog leader or the dog own

I think we are all responsible, and it is a matter of responsibility.

I went to understand what happened, and**the**, and many netizens spoke. To sum up, the thing is probably that the teenage girl took someone else's dog out to play and couldn't pull it, and when the big dog chased the puppy, the girl couldn't hold it back and let go, and then the old man was thrown down by the dog leash. The dog girl is only a teenager, not a dog owner, and when she sees the dog cute, she takes it out to play.

In my opinion, the responsibility of the dog handler is greater than that of the dog owner.

Teenage girls who think the dog is cute and brought out to play, can't they play with the dog at the dog owner's house? Sure to take it out for a walk? The key is that the girl can't pull the dog with little strength, and she has to take the dog out, which is really dangerous!

I don't know if there is a dog owner, do the work of reminding in advance, this dog is so big, the strength must be not small, just let others take it away? If it's really for the good of the dog, I don't think you can give the dog to someone else.

I don't think it's clear, it's the responsibility of many parties for this kind of thing to happen.

This girl didn't hold the dog, I think this is the biggest reason, if the dog is held, this kind of tragedy will not happen, after all, it is a living person who is gone, or it is quite sad. If the owner of the dog didn't let the girl take the dog out in the first place, or if the girl didn't lead the dog in the first place, this tragedy would not have happened.

In **, after the girl called the dog back, she should have seen the old man lying on the ground, and she should have panicked, so when the witness called her, she ran away without looking back. I can understand this kind of panic, anyone will want to escape if they get into trouble, but we Chinese young people should have a sense of responsibility and responsibility, and we must have the courage to bear the mistakes we have made and make up for them.

This kind of behavior of girls is to say that it is manslaughter and escape, but according to their age, teenagers should be under the age of eighteen, and they should be dealt with as appropriate.

Let me give you another popular science, in case of falling, what kind of posture will minimize the damage, you can take a look at the following two pictures. <>

That's my opinion.

This is in line with the legal position, i.e. everyone should be legally responsible for their words and actions and the consequences caused by them. In this case, the responsibility almost goes to the person who leads the dog, but if he cannot bear the civil liability, the dog owner will be jointly and severally liable. Raising a dog is not play, and it must not be taken lightly.

You should know if the Japanese devils are responsible or not, you are too full to eat, and a lot of them are overwhelmed.

No one is going to pursue it, you always don't mean anything! I am afraid that the world will not be chaotic!

No responsibility, accidents, no accountability.

Personally, I think that the dog owner needs to be responsible, and the dog owner must supervise his pet dog, and the dog at that time obviously had a long leash, which was one of the mistakes of the dog owner. Due to his own negligence, let someone else take the dog away, the dog owner is still legally responsible.

If you really want to be held accountable for this matter, I think it should be the responsibility of the dog leader, after all, the owner of the dog did not know that such a thing would happen, and the dog leader did not hold it well, and it was irresponsible to choose to go after learning that the old man was tripped up, but because the dog leader is still a minor, it should be his parents to take responsibility.

I feel that the dog owner has tripped over a leash and dies, and the dog handler bears the main responsibility. Because the dog handler did not have the consent of the dog owner. The accident caused by taking the dog out.

The death of the old man after tripping over the dog leash is fundamentally the responsibility of the dog owner, because the dog leader is a 12-year-old girl, is a citizen who does not have the ability to bear the criminal capacity, although the dog owner is not aware of, no subjective negligence, but the dog caused the consequences of hurting people, the dog owner needs to be held responsible.

I think this matter is the responsibility of the dog handler, because the owner of the dog did not know that the dog was taken away by someone else and should not be responsible.

The old man tripped over a dog leash and died, as the original owner of the dog, will he also be implicated in compensation?

According to the investigation, it is another matter whether the owner of the pet dog knows that the little girl is not the owner of the pet dog. <>

As the saying goes, those who don't know are not guilty, so this matter depends on how much responsibility the dog owner needs to bear, it is completely to see whether the dog owner knows or is worthless, if it is because the little girl is playful and does not inform the dog owner to take the dog out, then the dog owner is completely unaware of the situation, including anything that happens outside, the dog owner does not know, so the dog owner does not need to take responsibility, although the dog is his, but the dog is not led out by the dog owner, Therefore, the owner of the dog does not need to be held liable, but needs the guardian of the little girl to bear the corresponding civil compensation. <>

But if the owner of the dog is aware of this incident, and he knows that his dog was led out by a 12-year-old girl and had an accident, then the dog owner needs to pay a certain amount of compensation for this matter. Because the state stipulates that minors are not allowed to walk their dogs, and they are walking their dogs alone. Therefore, as a dog owner, if he knows that his dog was led out by a 12-year-old girl and did not stop it, the dog owner needs to bear the corresponding responsibility for this matter.

After all, there would be no such thing without this dog, but in the final analysis, this matter is that the 12-year-old girl did not pull the dog tight, so this kind of accident happened, and the final compensation must be the guardian of the little girl. <>

Therefore, in our daily life, if we are also dog lovers, or if we have a pet dog at home, we must tie the dog leash when walking the dog, so as not to let the dog run to some places without its control, so as to avoid bringing some trouble to other citizens. And for some citizens who don't have dogs, when they see pets running around, they must try to avoid them and don't harm anyone.

So far, this incident has been characterized as an accident by the public security organs, and the dog owner does not need to bear any responsibility, but in fact, from a moral point of view, the dog owner and the girl who led the dog should bear a little responsibility.

Bear civil liability, compensate for economic losses, don't bear criminal liability, this dog owner is also quite wronged.

I think I have secondary responsibility, first of all, the dog is tethered to the owner at home, the little girl took the dog out to play without the consent of others, which tripped the old man to death, the main responsibility lies with the little girl's family, but the dog owner also has a dereliction of duty, did not take care of his dog.

According to Article 1245 of the Ming Code of China, if an animal is raised and causes injury to others, the animal keeper or manager shall bear tort liability. However, it can be proved that the damage was caused intentionally or by gross negligence on the part of the infringed party. The liability can be waived or reduced, but in this case, there is no intentional or gross negligence on the part of the infringed party, so the dog owner should bear all the tort liability.

Dog owners need to be fully responsible. Because dog owners have an obligation to take good care of their dogs, if the dog accidentally injures someone, the dog owner needs to take full responsibility.

Criminal liability is required. Because after the old man tripped and fell, the dog owner fled directly, and the old man died, which is a death caused by escape, and the sentence is relatively heavy.

The owner of the dog should be fully responsible for this incident, because the owner of the dog did not take good care of the dog, which led to the death of the old man.

Whenever you walk on the street, you will always see someone walking the dog on the street, and of course you will like the very cute dogs in the face of others, but there are still many people who will feel scared, afraid that those puppies will suddenly feel unpleasant and pounce. As for the case of an elderly man near Luoshui Market in Xingtan Town, Shunde District, Foshan, Guangdong Province, who tripped over a rope leading a dog, we still rarely consider the existence of this danger.

It is understood that a local 12-year-old girl took out another family's puppy in the village to play, and the dog broke free near the Luoshui market, and then ran away with a rope, and the rope dragged on the ground and accidentally tripped the 88-year-old woman Mai in the village, and finally did not save the old woman's life after rescue.

With regard to this incident, it is prima facie that it was an accident and that the conditions for a criminal case are not met. It is also stated in the criminal law that accidents caused by irresistible or unforeseeable causes are not subject to the discretion of the criminal law as to whether they are subjectively intentional or negligent. Therefore, the little girl does not need to bear criminal responsibility for this incident.

However, there is also civil liability, which is also detailed in the Civil Code, and if an animal causes injury to others, the keeper or manager should bear tort liability. If it is the fault of a third party, the third party or the keeper or manager shall compensate.

And because the little girl is a minor, her guardian needs to pay compensation. It is understood that his father is an alcoholic and rarely takes care of his children all day. The local ** also carried out psychological counseling for the child after the incident.

After further development, the victim's family said that they did not want to inquire about the matter again and would not hold the little girl responsible. The family does not hold them accountable, and this matter is over, but this kind of thing in society is far from stopping here. The "Regulations on the Management of Dog Breeding in Foshan City" issued by the local ** this year also stipulates that dogs should be led or carried by people with civil capacity.

He was willing to take the initiative to take responsibility, but the family of the old man refused, and the other party did not need to take responsibility.

You need to take responsibility, after all, it is because of the dog that the old man died, and the dog owner needs to bear all the responsibility.

I feel like dog owners should take some of the blame. Because the dog owner did not fulfill his responsibility to take good care of the dog, he was taken away by the girl, which led to an accident.

Of course, there is responsibility. If the dog owner is obliged to manage his pet well and not cause harm to others, the dog leash is also part of the pet, and the elderly are responsible for tripping the dog owner.

I think it should be, because he didn't look favorably on it, it's his fault, and he doesn't blame others.

This cannot be described in words, but should be judged by what the specific situation was at that time and what the result of the police determination was.