What do you think about the daughter s desire to sever ties with her mother s family due to the unev

Updated on society 2024-06-24
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    I don't think we should cut ties with our mothers because of the distribution of family property.

    A report that he wanted to sever ties with his mother's family because of the uneven distribution of family property has aroused people's attention. Netizens expressed different views on this. Some netizens believe that the same children should divide the family property equally.

    Some netizens believe that they should not focus on family property, but on the elderly, and filial piety is the most important.

    In this regard, I think this woman should not cut ties with her mother's family because of the division of family property.

    First, family affection cannot be broken because of family property.

    No matter where her daughter goes, she is always connected to her mother's family. Although he is married, the family relationship will not change. Family ties can't be broken because of family property problems. <>

    Second, update the concept of pension.

    Some places think that providing for the elderly is a matter for their sons. On the issue of the distribution of family property, it is natural that all of it should be given to the son. But now people's perceptions are changing.

    Pension is not only a matter for sons, but also for daughters. Therefore, in the face of the practical problem of family property, the elders must have principles, and it is best to distribute them equally. After all, his daughter is also his own flesh and blood.

    Third, be kind to the elderly

    As children, filial piety should be put first, rather than worrying about the family property of the elderly. The old man has worked hard all his life, and what he wants most is to see a full house of children and grandchildren, and what he hopes most is that when he is old, his children can be by his side. Even if a daughter is married, she also has the obligation to support her parents.

    This is both a legal and a moral requirement. <>

    Although the problem of family property is a very real problem, I do not think that we should apply our experience and attention to the problem of family property. Instead, we should put our minds on the elderly. If there is a dispute between children over family property, the old man will not be happy in his heart, and he will feel regret in his heart.

    What the elderly prefer to see is harmony among their children. As children, they should be filial to their parents.

    Although this daughter encountered a very real problem with the distribution of family property. But I want her to adjust her mindset. Be filial to your parents and get along with your mother's family.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I think the relationship should be severed, because many families nowadays are patriarchal, thinking that after the daughter gets married, it has nothing to do with the family, and the good things are not the turn of the daughter, but when there is something difficult, the girl will be the first thing to think of, and never the son.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    I think this daughter is very unfilial, his parents must feel very cold, the child raised by their own frugality, because the family property has to be severed, and the daughter has no intention of raising the elderly in the family.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I don't think daughters should cut off their relationship with their parents because of this, after all, it is not easy for parents to give birth to themselves; You should communicate well with your parents.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I don't think my daughter's approach is correct, and there is no need to cut ties with her family for the sake of family property.

Related questions
5 answers2024-06-24

As long as it belongs to the marital property of the two of you, you can divide it, but the things in the old man's name can't be divided.

24 answers2024-06-24

The old man gave all the family property to his granddaughter, does the son have the right not to provide for the elderly? The son has no right not to support the elderly, because the old man raised you when he was a child, in the law of the country, the old man is old, you should be filial to the old man, Lao Tzu life This is also a kind of national regulation.

6 answers2024-06-24

At a time when equality between men and women has been deeply rooted in the hearts of the people, this problem is really embarrassing, and of course married daughters can share the family property! >>>More

7 answers2024-06-24

Depending on the degree of disability, if you can't take care of yourself - someone needs to take care of you, then the parents can write a suicide note before the temporary can take care of a little more, if it's just a general disability can take care of themselves and now enjoy the national subsistence allowance, then you shouldn't be able to share a little more property, how specific is the ** department must be divided according to the actual problem.

27 answers2024-06-24

This happens, but it's rare. If the son is not filial, maybe those filial daughters will help take care of the elderly, leaving the family property to the son, in fact, before the illness, the general old man after the age of 60, will transfer the family's real estate, land to the son, so there will be a situation where the family property is left to the son, but only the daughter will take care of the sick situation.