-
Anonymous users2024-02-12The person concerned does not have the right to access the surveillance video of the public area, which is not in doubt (in fact, it is okay to go through the back door)! If necessary, you can call the police to assist in investigating the cause of the theft, and you can negotiate with the company to obtain monitoring to achieve the purpose of solving the case! It is not possible to delete it without permission.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-11Legal Analysis: It is illegal to delete surveillance footage without permission. Where important evidence is fabricated or destroyed, obstructing the people's court's trial of the case, the people's court may impose a fine or detention on the basis of the severity of the circumstances; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law.
Legal basis: Article 111 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China: Where litigation participants or other persons exhibit any of the following conduct, the people's courts may impose fines or detention on the basis of the severity of the circumstances; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law.
1) Fabricating or destroying important evidence, obstructing the people's court's trial of a case;
2) Using violence, threats, or bribery to prevent witnesses from testifying, or instigating, bribing, or coercing others to give false testimony;
3) Concealing, transferring, selling, or destroying property that has already been sealed or seized, or property that has been inventoried and ordered to be kept, or transferring property that has been frozen;
4) Insulting, defaming, framing, beating, or retaliating against judicial personnel, litigation participants, witnesses, translators, evaluators, inquest personnel, or persons assisting in enforcement;
5) Using violence, threats, or other methods to obstruct judicial personnel from performing their duties;
6) Refusal to perform on a judgment or ruling of a people's court that has already taken legal effect.
People's courts may fine or detain units that exhibit any of the conduct provided for in the preceding paragraph; where a crime is constituted, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10If a person deletes the surveillance footage, they may be held legally liable, depending on the motive and impact of the deletion.
In some cases, the deletion of surveillance footage may constitute a crime, such as destruction of evidence, obstruction of official duties, etc., and if convicted, the punishment will be commensurate. In addition, if the deletion of the video affects the trial of the judicial case, it may have an impact on the outcome of the case, thereby affecting the interests of the parties, and may lead to the accountability of relevant personnel.
However, there may be circumstances in which the deletion of surveillance footage may not constitute an offence, such as when the surveillance footage has expired, or where the deletion is for lawful purposes, such as to protect the privacy of individuals. However, in any case, if the deletion of the surveillance footage harms the legitimate rights and interests of others, legal liability may arise for the person who deleted it.
Therefore, generally speaking, it is recommended not to delete the surveillance video at will without a good reason to avoid possible legal risks and unnecessary troubles.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09Deletion of surveillance footage is an act of destroying evidence, and if the evidence such as surveillance footage and regulatory audio recording is within the scope of the law, then the deletion or tampering may lead to the legal liability of the offender.
First of all, surveillance video is a kind of evidence, if the video is deleted in a major event such as a crime or accident, it may affect the results of the investigation and accountability, and even affect the outcome of the criminal verdict.
Secondly, if the deleted is the surveillance video of the ** department or enterprise, then the department or company can
In general, the owners of the public places in the community do not have the right to use them privately. In fact, many people can see people in the community to enclose a piece of land in the garden downstairs of the community to grow some of their favorite vegetables or plants, and some people will enclose a piece of land to raise their pets or build some buildings. But these are actually wrong, because to put it bluntly, "public places" are shared by everyone, and if they are occupied by one person, it is definitely not right. >>>More
Penalties for mistakes should be made, but fines are not entitled. Report to the Education Bureau.
If the person concerned uses an ID card, the probation can be found out when he goes out privately. >>>More
1. Pure public goods.
Refers to the fact that it is generally not exclusive. >>>More
In 1996, the Fujian Provincial Department of Radio and Television set up a television program exchange center, whose function is to implement a unified supply of films for county-level cable television stations. However, the managers soon discovered that the system of unified film supply had insurmountable drawbacks. For example, it is difficult to unify the standards for collecting program fees; The quality of program purchases is not high; The cost of ripping technology is high and the quality is unreliable; Running back and forth in various places, it is inconvenient to work, etc. >>>More