Is it good to have children in free range now, and is it good to keep children in free range?

I think as a thoughtful parent should think more about what is best for him. Today's children are in captivity for the majority, so as to develop their own habits, through setbacks, like a pot of greenhouse flowers, can not withstand the wind and rain, for children's long-term education, group activities are very necessary, appropriate stocking is also needed. Also depending on the specific situation of the child itself, long-term captivity is certainly not beneficial.

Use more snacks!

Free-range is possible, but must be limited and within parental control.

There are benefits, so that he can experience some things, he will understand better, and it is good for personality development.

The biggest benefit of free-range education is that it can protect the child's nature, but there are also disadvantagesThe disadvantage is that the child may ignore the importance of the rules in his heart, lack the sense of rules, may not be polite, or lack moral awareness.

In fact, in the real sense of free-range education, the first thing to do is to establish the child's awe of the rules, to carry out stocking within the scope of the rules, stocking is not an excuse for parents to be lazyIt's not that the child is free-range, and he has time to carry out some activities he wants to do, which is actually a kind of laziness, the real stocking is to be stocked under the supervision of parents, you have to know very clearly whether the child's general direction is wrong, whether it is on the road to release nature or on the road of ignoring the rules is getting farther and farther.

Most of today's children have been spoiled from an early age, and they have lived in the arms of their families since they were young. At this time, children may develop some bad habits, such as developing some princess diseases and the like. But in fact, children have to experience some setbacks from an early age in order to better face their future life, so to speakThere are many people who propose free-range education, so that children can have a little more natural attributes from an early age and understand some laws in society from an early age.

At this time, the child has not yet fully formed the outlook on life, values, and the worldview is not completely correct, so it is possible for the child to develop some bad habits, or to cultivate some incorrect mentality.

If the stocking education is carried out well, so that the child first has a heartfelt awe of the rules, and then releases the nature, it may be more beneficial to the child's growthIf it can be done like this, then because the child has been released from an early age, then in the future, whether it is in study and life or in the workplace, he can show greater creativity, better than his peers, and have a better survival mentality than his peers, and will have more advantages in the future development.

If there is no good stocking education, then the child will ignore the importance of the rules and treat the rules as a mustard, which is very scaryIf the child does this, then eventually the child may not understand the importance of rules from an early age, and may grow up to wander on the edge of the law. In addition, if the child is not polite or has not been supervised by parents from an early age, it is easy to leave an illusion of impoliteness in the eyes of peers or others, and develop in a direction that is very harmful to the child.

Therefore, as long as the stocking education is not carried out well, the harm is particularly great, the main harm is that it is difficult for children to cultivate a correct outlook on life, values and worldview, and it is also difficult for children to win in the future competition, because stocking is not done well, it is possible for children to ignore the importance of rules, and become a child who does not understand the rules and is not polite.

It will make children suffer from some bad habits, make children unwilling to learn, lack of independent ability, have a very weak sense of time, and have no sense of responsibility, which will affect the normal growth of children.

It will make the child infected with bad habits, and it will also lack guidance, so that the child lacks self-management ability, is exposed to bad knowledge, and will develop bad habits, etc.

First, if it is the child's infancy, his ideology is far from being stereotyped, and some or even a considerable part of the influence of the environment on him may be corrected during his adolescence. So this influence is not decisive. Second, if it is a child's adolescence, this influence can play a very important role in the formation of his worldview and character.

Even, sometimes decisively. Once the ideological character is fixed, correction is not a one-day thing. Therefore, we must reject our innate nature, especially when children are teenagers.

Parents should educate their children on safety and must grasp the degree of rent change. Laissez-faire does not mean that it does not matter, only in this way can children grow up healthily.

1.Free-range is not a laissez-faire for parents to know that free-range children are not a laissez-faire for children, these are two different concepts, and parents should distinguish them. Parents feel that their children should be free-range, so they don't care about their children, they are only responsible for their children's living expenses, and they don't care about the safety of their children, they let them develop freely.

But this is not free-range, this is permissive, and letting the child go like this will make the child have a bad character and be easily harmed. 2.There should be rulesWhen parents educate their children in a free-range environment, they should set a rule for the wronged children, and they should not let the children be free at will.

Parents can give their children a certain degree of freedom, but they can't give their children all the freedom, parents should explain the rule of safety to their children, and let their children be free within this rule, otherwise there will be punishment. Parents should use rules to regulate some of their children's behaviors, and they can't let their children's behaviors do as they please, which is not okay. When parents educate their children in the free range, they must carefully grasp this degree, if parents do not grasp this degree, it will make the child become very reckless.

Children will learn bad behaviors, form bad concepts, and cause children to have wrong cognitions, which will lead to defects in the child's personality and cause psychological deviations. Therefore, it is very important for parents to know how to master this hands-off education.

Thinking that free-range children is not very good, and it may make children develop some bad habits. If parents always raise their children, it is possible for them to become disobedient to their parents' discipline and make their children's tempers particularly big. Therefore, parents cannot completely raise their children, and must discipline their children moderately, so as to promote the development of children and make them better.

Parents are very busy at work, and they may adopt a free-range policy for their children in order to play games or other entertainment activities after work, which is actually delaying the children. Therefore, parents are not able to completely raise their children, in fact, raising children does not mean that they do not care about their children, but to give children a certain amount of space to play, so that children can say their true thoughts, so that children can make some decisions. Parents can properly discipline their children, let them misunderstand and go down the wrong path, and also make children feel the care of their parents, so that children will not be particularly lonely and helpless.

Because the age of the child is relatively young, if the parents completely raise the child, it is possible to make the child very lonely and make the child not feel the love of the parents.

Parents should raise their children appropriately, give them space to play, and help them when they need it. Because the age of the children is relatively young, they can't completely solve the problem, so parents can't ignore the child, if the parents don't care about the child, then no one cares about the child, it is possible to make the child very lonely, very helpless. At this time, the child may feel the care and love of the parents, and will think that the parents do not love themselves at all, so it is not correct to completely free range, and the parents must discipline the child appropriately.

Yes. Because this kind of parenting will allow the development of children's free thinking, will make children's mentality better, and is better for children.

Stocking is not for Chong Liling to the child is good, stocking will only make the child more unruly, the relationship between parents and children will be particularly far away, stocking is very irresponsible for children.

Stocking is really for the good of the child, and the reason why I say this is because the way of stocking can make the child understand his empty thoughts, and it can also broaden the thinking ability of the child's ruler.

Parents carry out "free-range" education for their children, children have more opportunities to exercise, he can choose according to his own interests and preferences, he will be exposed to a broader outside world, and have a more relaxed space for growth.

Absolutely. The children educated in this way will be more cheerful, more optimistic, more sunny, and will have a more easy-going personality, have their own opinions, and can make up their minds about everything, and will not follow the crowd.

It's still better, so that you can create a particularly good growth environment for the child, and then you can also make the child's personality become more lively and cheerful, and then the child will not be particularly restrained, and will not be particularly inferior.

Not good. Because if you raise a child, it is easy to let the child go astray, so I don't think it is good to raise a child.

It is difficult to explain, it is not recommended to adopt the free-range mode, because the children are minors, and many things need guidance from parents to know what is right and what is wrong, otherwise, it is easy to have problems.

The way to educate children is that you can't keep them free, because if you really let them go, he won't be able to take back his heart in the future, and he won't study hard.

There are many ways to educate children, is stocking good? This proper stocking is fine, but it can't be done all the time, because if it is always like this, it may make the child too lazy.

If there are children breaking the law, many stocking have certain advantages and disadvantages, and it can be stopped in moderation.

Stocking emphasizes more on the autonomy and randomness of children, and tends to fend for themselves, which is a laissez-faire education model. Although free-range breeding is free from the shackles of "wide loss of reeds", it should be carried out under certain supervision and guidance, and it is to find a balance between the two extreme types of education, that is, to give children effective guidance on the basis of respecting children's wishes, nature and autonomy. <

Stocking emphasizes more on children's autonomy and arbitrariness, and tends to fend for themselves, which is a laissez-faire education model. Although free-range breeding is free from the shackles of the "circle", it should be carried out under certain supervision and guidance, and it is to find a balance between the two extreme types of education, that is, to give children effective guidance on the basis of respecting God's will, nature and autonomy.