If God is good, why does He still allow suffering to exist in the world?

Human suffering is the ladder of social progress, and if there is peace, it will lose the momentum to move forward, although it is cruel, it is a reality. God is good, but principled.

This is just a belief of people, and with faith in their hearts, they can get through the hard days and support a spiritual pillar in their hearts.

Since he is a god, he is not a man. If you are not human and are higher than human beings, why should you care about human suffering, sorrow and joy? It's like you're going to know how ants live.

Human beings are too ignorant, so they are constantly suffering, such as washing your hands in a ditch somewhere in Jiangxi, you will get hookworm disease, because you don't know the characteristics of this place.

Human beings are stupid and ignorant, and to say that human beings are smart is also arrogant and ignorant. You call God how can you do it?

If there are secular rules, people don't have to think about what the disadvantages are, because they have been passed down for thousands of years. But people ask why the United States has so many innovative talents, while China does not. I can't find a reasonable answer, so I can only talk nonsense.

There is no god in this world, but people take it as if they exist and virtualize it in order to put their faith in their hearts, so if we want to keep suffering away from us, we have to work harder, only by working harder, and striving for our ideal prospects, so that we can make our so-called suffering a little less.

Suffering comes from the best of man, and God's first creation was good. Man obeys his desires and abuses his free will. And the end of sin involves suffering!

Suffering is contrasting, and only when there is contradiction can it develop. Compared with beasts, man is not ignorant and is not slaughtered in captivity. Is it the kindness of the gods to people?

A premise is a false proposition, how to arrive at the right conclusion.

There is no god in this world.

Suffering is a kind of value judgment, and the actual material environment and state are not suitable for the satisfaction of human survival needs, that is, suffering.

If God is good, why is He still prone to weeping? Existence in the world, as long as there is happiness, there is suffering, it is opposite, even if you don't feel that he is suffering, there are people who feel that he is suffering, this is different people, will have different cognitions.

If God is good, why does He still allow difficulties to exist in fashion?

Amitabha.

The landlord will give an example.

A and B were sick and hospitalized at the same time. They are very sick and need a lot of money and medicine to heal.

At this time, a certain family's unit sent him a lot of money, which was just enough to solve the problem of drug expenses, so a certain A was discharged from the hospital, and because of a lot of money, he lived a worry-free life.

B died because there was no one to send money for treatment.

We will say that Person A is lucky that someone will give him money to help him, and Person B will have the same illness as him, and it is unfortunate that he died because he had no money. The world is not fair.

But if you look at it from the perspective of cause and effect of Buddhism.

A may have been working quietly for 20 years in his workplace before he fell ill and was hospitalized. In the past 20 years, the efficiency of the unit has not been good, and there has been no salary. When A was sick, the unit had funds to pay back wages, so it sent life-saving money to A.

If this is the case, the so-called luck of a certain A is because he has not been paid for his accumulated dedication in the previous twenty years. Now it just happens that when I am sick, I get a salary that should have been paid a long time ago. The remuneration of work has nothing to do with character.

Maybe A is just working hard and his character is not good.

We can't see what a person has done before he was admitted to the hospital. This is his past life. Only to see his present life, that is, during this time.

Before a certain B got sick, he may have never worked or paid, which is the blessing of everyone's previous life. So no one sent money for treatment. That is, there is not enough good fortune accumulated in this life to eliminate disasters and karma. It has nothing to do with character.

I hope that after reading this parable, the landlord can understand the basic concept of cause and effect in the third world of Buddhism.

There is no necessary relationship between the good and evil deeds of this life and the resources of previous lives.

Or another example. Although some villains are very bad to others, they may be very good to their families, and good intentions will be rewarded, and bad deeds will be rewarded. Great good and great evil cannot cancel each other out.

Humanity is only one of the six realms, and we cannot see the whole process, and we cannot make conclusions based on one-sided feelings alone.