The Chinese in Have the Chinese Lost Their Self Confidence .

The vast number of working people and creative inventors who do not seek fame and fortune, work hard, create social wealth and splendid culture, and promote the progress of history, such as Bi Sheng, Li Shizhen, etc.; One is the revolutionaries who are not afraid of bloodshed and sacrifice and resist reactionary rule and the national heroes who persist in resisting foreign aggression in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, such as Chen She, Li Zicheng, Hong Xiuquan, Yue Fei, Wen Tianxiang, etc.; One is the person who represents the interests of the people, disregards personal safety, runs for the relief and alleviation of the people's suffering, and asks for the people's lives, such as Du Fu, Bai Juyi, Guan Hanqing, Tan Sitong, Xia Minghan, Liu Hulan, etc.; One is a person who has gone through hardships and worked hard to explore the teachings of Buddhism, such as Fa Xian, Xuanzang, etc.

The term "backbone" is willing to refer to the vertebrae of the human body, and in the text, it refers to the backbone of China.

We Chinese in the previous article refer to the Kuomintang and its royal literati.

At that time, Japan invaded the three northeastern provinces of China.

The Kuomintang hoped for the League of Nations.

I hope that the League of Nations can stand out for China.

But the League of Nations didn't want to cause trouble either.

It is recognized that the three northeastern provinces have a special status.

It is justified to say that Japan invaded Northeast China.

Later, it is said that it is the Chinese nation, and it must be that the Chinese nation is unwilling and the whole nation has risen. Stand up together against foreign invaders.

Believe me, we Chinese will become stronger and more confident through our own efforts.

Have the Chinese lost their self-confidence? to refute erroneous arguments by rebuttal arguments, mainly by using the method of counter-argumentation.

This article is a refutation. What is refuted is the pessimistic argument that "the Chinese have lost their self-confidence," and the key point of this pessimistic argument is to "generalize from partiality," just like Lu Xun.

He pointed out: "To say that the Chinese have lost their self-confidence is to refer to some people, but to apply it to the whole is simply slander." The author takes reality as the weft and history as the economic organization material, starting with reality, putting forward the opponent's argument (paragraph 1), then leading to the opponent's argument (paragraph 2), and then admitting that the argument presented is true and "true", but it cannot deduce the conclusion that "the Chinese have lost their self-confidence", they cannot prove the argument (paragraph 3-5), which is a direct refutation; In the middle, it is extended to history, and then from history to reality, and uses ancient and modern examples to demonstrate the correct argument that "China has Chinese who have not lost their self-confidence", which is in direct opposition to the fallacy of the other side (paragraphs 6-8), which is an indirect refutation; At the end, it is not only a summary of history, but also a summary of reality, and comes to the conclusion that "the existence of self-confidence, the article of the prime minister is not enough evidence, and you must see the underground for yourself", and according to the topic, the questions raised by the topic are made.