What is the difference between Ando processors, Core, Itanium, and Xeon CPUs?

Professional Server CPUs....Noble dead. Generally not considered.

Core is mainly used in the consumer market of the CPU, the corresponding customers are mainly the public, personal.

Whereas, Itanium and Xeon are both CPUs that are mainly used in servers. The corresponding customers are mainly enterprises.

Xeon uses the RISC architecture, while Ando uses the EPIC architecture. The Itanium platform will be twice as powerful as Xeon, while ** will be on par with Xeon. As the industry consolidates, the Epic architecture represented by Itanium will become the standard architecture.

However, at this stage, Itanium and Xeon are facing different sales ranges, and each is good at it.

Now Intel no longer supports Itanium, and many systems no longer support it.,Mainstream servers use U or Xeon View original post"

It depends on the person, in fact, there is no difference, simply put, there is a little difference in performance and **...

Itanium's machines are generally divided into small machines. He is the processor of IA64, which was first developed by HP, and later jointly developed with Intel, due to the unfavorable development of Intel, HP later turned the developers of Compaq to the development of Itanium, so the performance was very good in the second generation of Itanium.

Itanium is Intel's original 64-bit microprocessor. With the development of the Merced** name for socks, it was hoped that Grip Edge and the institutions beneath it would provide the foundation for next-generation software for serving and high-end workstation markets.

Intel plans to adopt additional IA-64 microprocessors, which are known as McKinley, Madison, and Deerfield.

In addition to supporting a 64-bit processor and a set of 28 registers, the 64-bit design allows the use of very large memory (VLM). Overall, this system has developed the characteristics of explicitly parallel instruction processing (EPIC), which is the result of the joint development of Intel and Hewlett-Packard. These provide the advantage of parallel processing operations of computer instructions between diagnostics and thinking.

It's Pentium, 0 years of products, long since the elimination of now are i3 i4 i5 i7 series.

The performance is high, but unfortunately you can't use it, the server's,

Itanium may have a bit more processing power, supporting 1024GB of RAM. Xeon is suitable for workstations, and may not need to be so good.

Comprehensive and organized information, it is best to read on the Intel homepage. Or wiki it. The list is described, very clearly.

Yes, Intel has dropped its support for Itanium. In the past, X86 only supported 32-bit systems, but at that time, Itanium was able to support 64-bit, and Itanium was positioned as a high-end server, parallel machine and other high value-added computer systems. However, since the beginning of Xeon in the core era, the support for 64-bit systems is no longer a problem, therefore, besides, Xeon itself supports multi-processor parallel processing, and the market positioning conflicts with Itanium, coupled with the high price and low sales of Itanium, the launch of new products is far from being as fast as Xeon, and there is no particularly obvious advantage over Xeon in terms of performance (the new generation of Xeon processors can learn from Itanium in terms of design), so Intel reluctantly gave up the support and development of Itanium.

From the perspective of product line, Intel gave up Itanium and independently developed XEON, which can shorten the product line and accelerate the upgrading of products; Segment the market for greater profits.

The architecture is different, one is RISC, one is VLIW, and this closed system is more about who has more influence, IBM is naturally much more influential than HP+Intel on the minicomputer, and now payment companies (UnionPay, Alipay) basically use a large number of Power+AIX+Oracle, and some servers such as the People's Bank of China, foreign exchange trading centers and the like are basically power minicomputers. Intel has long announced that it has stopped the follow-up development of Itanium, and many software companies have also announced that they will stop the follow-up development of the corresponding Itanium software, such as Microsoft stopped the development of Windows for Itanium, and Itanium is actually dead.

The boss of the CPU, deservedly IBM, has always been, or Apple uses it, most of the supercomputers are used, and the desktop platform is Intel (now AMD will soon surpass it);