-
Anonymous users2024-02-07At the same time, the Pentium 4 generation also has the launch of the Celeron 1 belt.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06Celeron processors are identical to Pentium processors in terms of compute cores, except that the size of the L2 cache is different. The L2 cache size of the existing desktop processor P4 is 512KB, while the L2 cache size of the P4 Celeron is 128KB. The L2 cache size of the Pentium-M processor used in laptops is 1MB, and the L2 cache size of the new Celeron M processor is 512KB, which is the same as that of P4.
The Pentium-M and Celeron M processors are the same except for the L2 cache size.
Differences: What are the features of the new Celeron M processor The new Celeron M processor is a simplified version of the Pentium M processor (commonly known as the Centrino processor), which reduces the L2 cache of the Pentium M processor by half, and the rest is exactly the same as the Pentium M processor. In addition, in order to distinguish between the two processors, Intel has lowered the operating frequency of Celeron M processors a bit, and the current highest frequency is.
Since then, the Celeron M processor has always been lower than the mainstream Centrino processor. This is due to Intel's product policy.
What is a dual-core CPU?
A dual-core processor is one that integrates two computing cores on a single processor to increase computing power. The concept of "dual-core" was first proposed by high-end server manufacturers such as IBM, HP, SUN and other high-end server manufacturers that support RISC architecture, but due to the high server quality and narrow application area of RISC architecture, it has not attracted widespread attention.
Dual-core processor architecture.
Recently, the concept of "dual-core" has gradually become popular, mainly referring to the dual-core technology based on the x86 open architecture. In this regard, the leading manufacturers are mainly AMD and Intel. Among them, the two have different ideas.
AMD was designed from the ground up with multi-core support in mind. All components are connected directly to the CPU, eliminating system architecture challenges and bottlenecks. The two processor cores are connected directly to the same core, and the cores communicate with each other at chip speed, further reducing latency between processors.
Intel, on the other hand, uses multiple cores to share a front-side bus. Experts believe that AMD's architecture makes it easier to achieve dual-core to multi-core, and Intel's architecture will encounter the bottleneck of multiple cores competing for bus resources.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-05The L2 cache of the P series is larger than that of the C series, and now it looks the same, and no one wants it.
It should be good, the 3rd Gen Core is perfectly compatible with the memory of DDR3 1600, I'm using the i3-2120 (2nd generation) which is said to be not very compatible with DDR3 1600. I bought it in April, and it cost 730 oceans, which is not expensive. Personally, I feel that the i3-2120 is already quite good, although it is only dual-core, but it can beat AMD dual-core products, and it is not under AMD's "star model" X-4640 In this case, i3-3220 should not be weak Inter's thing is a little more expensive
I think it will be a board of the B75 series. It's okay.
Graphics card: You can consider configuring an HD6850 so that you get 5000 blocks down to about the same. >>>More
Formally speaking, Intel is stronger in terms of multi-**, that is, those tones** are more convenient to encode, while AMD is stronger in floating-point computing ability, and it is much better than Intel for game convenience, and AMD processing is getting better and better in terms of temperature control, and even surpassing Intel, so which processor to choose depends on the purpose you buy the computer! >>>More
Snapdragon 712 processor is a processor released by Qualcomm Group on February 7, local time, it can be regarded as a slightly upgraded version of Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 processor, compared to Snapdragon 710 processor, it has two improvements The maximum frequency of the chip is upgraded to, according to the official data, it has 10 performance improvements relative to Snapdragon 710, Snapdragon 712 processor also supports fast charging, in addition, in terms of energy consumption, process, architecture, baseband, manufacturing, GPU, etc., The Snapdragon 712 does not have any improvements or changes relative to the 710.
On the processor, there is not much difference between the E-980 and the Snapdragon 765G. However, the E-980 will be higher in terms of performance scores. Therefore, the processor should be E-980, and S6 has vivo's exclusive acceleration engine support, which can play a more powerful performance, so I personally prefer vivoS6.