Is this a crime and what constitutes a crime?

I don't understand what you said about fraud What does it have to do with the above What does your previous behavior pay 200 yuan Kick the car door Slow to say it's not you Even if it's you yourself It's not a crime The so-called crime must be regulated by the criminal law You are a civil compensation for tort liability You are absolutely innocent But if you have the capacity for criminal responsibility (more than 16 mentally normal) have committed fraud (subjective intentional Using the concealment of the truth or fabricating facts to make him appear that the person disposes of the property against his true will and takes possession of it Illegally infringe on the victim's property ownership Reach a certain amount The harm is serious) If you have all of these, then there is a crime I guess you shouldn't be able to come to the encyclopedia to ask questions so simply Unlike fraudsters, so rest assured.

As long as the public security bureau has a record, it has a criminal record, which has an impact on the visa.

Your best lawyer is to ask that way!

The incident is small, there should be no impact, rest assured, even if there is some impact, you should be able to solve the matter by looking for a relationship.

If there is no record, there is no impact.

The key is to go to the public security bureau and make sure that there is no record on your file.

Good luck.

A crime is a person who has been criminally punished, and according to you, it must be that there is no crime.

Legal Analysis: To constitute a crime, there must be four basic elements, namely, the object of the crime, the objective aspect of the crime, the subject of the crime, and the subjective aspect of the crime.

1. The object of crime refers to the social relations that are violated by criminal acts and protected by China's criminal law. Any crime must necessarily violate an object, and there is no such thing as a crime of detecting the source that does not violate the object.

2. The objective aspect of crime refers to the objective factual characteristics of the criminal activities provided for in the Criminal Law, including acts that endanger society, harmful consequences, and their causal relationships.

3. The subject of the crime refers to the natural person or unit that shall bear criminal responsibility in accordance with law for committing the criminal act.

IV. The subjective aspect of the crime refers to the psychological attitude of the criminal entity that must be present for the establishment of a crime as provided for in the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China towards the dangerous and dishonoring conduct carried out by the criminal entity and its harmful consequences.

Legal basis: Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China Article 3: Where the law clearly provides that it is a criminal act, it shall be convicted and sentenced in accordance with law; Where the law does not expressly provide for criminal conduct, it must not be convicted and sentenced.

In my opinion:This kind of behavior is an act of righteousness and courage, and it will not be suspected of a crime.

Specific reasons:

Not criminally responsible.

To constitute a crime, subjective intent or negligence is required. Obviously, this act was neither intentional nor negligent. It is an accident and does not bear criminal responsibility.

No civil liability.

Article 184 of the General Provisions of the Civil Law stipulates that: "If the aided person suffers damage due to the voluntary implementation of emergency assistance, the rescuer shall not bear civil liability. ”

This provision is the Chinese version of the Good Samaritan Law. The promulgation of this regulation is actually to encourage righteousness and courage and to eliminate the worries of those who act bravely. For example, if you encounter someone drowning and rescue them and carry out cardiopulmonary resuscitation, we know that cardiopulmonary resuscitation actually requires a large amount of force, and it must be pressed to a few centimeters below the chest breast, and if the implementation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation causes the recipient to fracture, there is no need to be held liable according to law.

According to Article 233 of the Criminal Law, "whoever causes death by negligence shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years; where the circumstances are more minor, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment is to be given. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions. "Extended Information.

Manslaughter means unintentional or premeditated homicide, homicide caused by negligence, or death of another person as a result of ordinary negligence. The object is the right to life of others.

Objectively, it is manifested as an act of negligence causing death. This offence is constituted only if the result of nemischievous death has occurred. On the subjective side, it is negligence, including negligent negligence and overconfident negligence.

The subject is a natural person who has reached the age of 16. Where serious injury by negligence causes the death of the victim, the crime of causing death by negligence should be directly convicted, and the crime of causing serious injury by negligence cannot be convicted, even if the case of causing death is not included in the case of causing serious injury by negligence.

The object of the offence is the right to life of others. The right to life is the personality right of a natural person whose interests in the maintenance of his or her life are the content. Its sanctity has been recognized by the Constitution and should be enforced by its sub-laws.

The act of depriving another person of the right to life, whether intentional or negligent, is a social hazard and should be punished by criminal law. Article 232 of this Act provides for the crime of intentional homicide. This article provides for the crime of negligence causing death.

It's happening, it's impossible to release people quickly, and even your friends can't escape the involvement, you have to be considered an accomplice. It's not a crime of instigation to cover up a crime, but a joint crime, and if that group commits homicide or intentional injury, your friend will be dealt with for that crime.

That Lin Lin's answer is correct, with the information you provide now, it can't be determined for the time being, you don't have to worry about sentencing and conviction, hire a better lawyer, no matter what he does, I don't know if he can be understood as a thug, no matter who you obey orders, it must be illegal, and it is not bad if you are not regarded as an accomplice or convicted of intentional injury. The key problem is that the police don't know how he answers, they don't know what the physical evidence is, and they don't even know a clear direction, so they can't give you a clear answer.

It's definitely a crime, but it shouldn't be too heavy, and it's a certain amount of money, but it's not a big problem.

Your friend shouldn't be involved in any cover-up, right? It is possible that the police have criminally detained him as a co-defendant, but I estimate that there is insufficient evidence and he is likely to be released.

It depends on how your friend's transcript and other people's transcripts, especially the boss's transcript, are written, if your friend knows that the boss asked him to call the gang out to deal with it for the purpose of fighting, then your friend belongs to the accomplice.