Shared products are no longer affordable, why are prices raised?

In 2014, the first batch of shared bicycles was born, which was initially developed by Peking University graduates to prepare for convenient travel on campus, which attracted many people's attention. In 2016, there were all kinds of shared bicycles, "little blue cars", "little yellow cars" and "little green cars", which suddenly appeared in our lives, making our lives more convenient, more energy-saving and emission-free.

Later, shared power banks, umbrellas, cars, these products slowly appeared in our lives, which did bring a lot of convenience. We gradually reduced our car travel and gradually got used to the existence of shared products. But now that the ** of shared products is slowly rising, many people are beginning to question whether to spend more on energy conservation and emission reduction.

Most people's choice is no, and people's initial purpose is not only convenience but also price

But the damage of shared products is far greater than we think. Some people's purpose is not simple, with the emergence of shared products, there is naturally a phenomenon that there are not enough products. The initial lockpicking, stealing car parts or using their own locks to keep others from touching them meant that the company had to do something to stop them.

It's also chilling to see some taxi drivers crouching at the entrance of the subway, deliberately damaging their bikes and throwing them into nearby rivers, leaving customers to do their cars. It was really shocking to see the riverside being torn down and stacked in a stack, which is the reason why the price of shared products has to be increased.

People often have good intentions and want to use shared products to improve everyone's lives, but such damage is not affordable for everyone. We hope you can take good care of our shared products. Let the era of sharing continue.

I think it's to make money, a product is basically a discount when it just comes out, and when the product matures, it will face the problem of raising the **.

One of the reasons for the increase in the number of shared products is that the shared products caused by improper management at the beginning have been greatly damaged by people, resulting in certain losses, and the current move is just to save a little benefit.

In the early stage, it is just to adapt to the market, so that consumers like to use it, and the price increase in the later stage is also to make money.

I think it's possible that sharing products doesn't make a lot of money now, and then merchants do it in order to make a profit.

When the shared product was first promoted, there was no profit at all, and now the product is mature, so it will be raised**.

I think this is that many people abuse the home product is to join its own only and even let him be, so the ** in order to make everyone more cherished.

Because many people abuse Japanese products, take them for themselves or even discard them, so they are promoted**. In order to make everyone cherish it more.

As a consumer, we should look at the price increase of the sharing economy, perhaps in order to provide more high-quality services, after all, the low-price model in the early stage has almost no profit at all. However, the price increase of the sharing economy is not a price increase without an upper limit, and the determination of ** also depends on the market supply and demand situation. At the same time, we must also provide consumers with better services and better user experience, and retaining consumers is fundamental.

Innovating and providing high-quality shared services is the key path for the healthy development of the sharing economy.

The price increase of sharing economy projects is indeed a common phenomenon, and my views on the price increase of shared consumption are as follows:

First: the main purpose of the sharing economy is to make money, many businesses will promote the sharing economy from the perspective of environmental protection, economy and sharing, but in fact, the sharing economy is also a money-making business, and the main purpose behind sharing is to make money. Although the sharing economy has a high subsidy at the beginning of its development and the unit price is relatively cheap, when the market gradually matures, businesses will also begin to harvest consumers, and they will start.

Whether it is a shared bicycle or a shared charging treasure, at the beginning of development, it is free or at an extremely cheap unit price for consumers to use, but once consumers develop the habit of sharing, then the business will begin to harvest consumers, after all, the business has also invested a lot of capital, so now the ** of the shared charging treasure has risen to four yuan an hour, and the ** of the shared bicycle has risen to one hour, which also makes many consumers unacceptable.

Second: the sharing economy is not a future, although many people are willing to contribute to environmental protection, the starting point of the sharing economy is actually for environmental protection, but if under the banner of environmental protection, or for the purpose of making money, consumers are not willing to pay. The emergence of shared bicycles could have reduced the travel of private cars, thereby reducing carbon dioxide emissions.

However, with the continuous development of the car, it is more expensive to travel by car than to take public transportation directly, so consumers will definitely not be willing to choose. After all, it doesn't take much effort to choose public transportation to travel the whole process, and if you choose to travel by shared bicycle, you have to pay both money and effort, so why bother? The same is true for shared charging treasures, at the beginning, consumers are willing to use it for convenience, and cheap is also one thing.

But now**continue**, has been beyond the acceptable range of consumers, if you charge according to four yuan an hour, then the use of a shared charging treasure is likely to cost ten yuan. Now it only costs a few dozen dollars to buy a power bank directly, and from an economic point of view, consumers are more willing to carry their own power bank to travel. Therefore, the shared charging treasure is no longer necessary, and it can also be replaced.

So in my opinion, if the sharing economy is still for the purpose of making money, there is no future in China, as long as the ****, consumers will change their travel habits and use the habit of charging treasure, then now the hot shared charging treasure will be the same as the sharing of bicycles, gradually withdraw from the market.

I think the price increase is inevitable, and the low price in the early stage is just to attract customers and let customers form a habit of use.

I understand very well, because with the development of society, the sharing economy will also increase in price.

I think this kind of price increase behavior is also understandable, because now people are very much identified with these sharing economy projects, and the market demand is also relatively large, so the price increase is also a very normal measure.

I don't think this kind of price increase behavior is very good, the sharing economy should bring convenience to everyone, if you do this, it may affect their development.

Because sharing is very popular now, the price of shared consumption is also rising.

The reason why the price of sharing will rise is very simple, it is because they want to make money, any merchant wants to make money, and he definitely doesn't want to do charity. Some people must say, why was their ** so cheap in the past, but now ** is so exaggerated. I think it should be like this, at the beginning, they didn't know if this thing could be liked by everyone, and they didn't know if it could satisfy everyone, so they could only use a very low ** to attract people.

Then it can be regarded as opening up your own popularity, after all, it costs a lot of money to advertise. <>

Then when everyone gets used to this thing and gets used to this thing, they slowly increase the price and slowly start to make a profit, after all, if it has always been so cheap, they may not make money. For example, if he shares a charging treasure, if he costs four or five yuan an hour at the beginning, then I believe that many people will not choose to charge, and they will definitely feel particularly expensive. But at the beginning, he didn't even spend the right money when he had activities, or one dollar, two dollars can be charged for a few hours, then everyone will think it's quite cost-effective, anyway, I'm in a hurry now, and I can afford to spend these few dollars, it's not a big deal.

At the beginning, we were able to buy a one-month card for a few dollars or dozens of dollars, or an annual card, which was really cheap. Let's think about it, a bicycle will cost you dozens of dollars to ride for a year, and you don't have to take him home every day, and you don't have to worry about whether it is very convenient for him to be headed, but if he rides for five dollars now, it is ten dollars to ride once, do you think you will go to the Kaistool to regret riding? Merchants definitely want to make money, but consumers definitely want to use the most suitable things at the cheapest price.

As for whether the consumer will pay, it depends on whether he is in urgent need, if it is urgent, even if it is expensive, he will pay. <>

With the rapid development of the economy, people's lives have undergone earth-shaking changes, people's living standards have generally risen, and now you can see some scientific and technological products everywhere, and many shared products in life have facilitated people's lives, such as sharing bicycles, sharing charging treasures, etc. So now let's look at the question, why does "shared" consumption rise in price? Will consumers still pay after the price increases?

After the price increase, many consumers may reduce their consumption of these shared products, and may choose to buy power banks, or commute by bus. <>

One. After the price of shared products increases, many consumers may spend less frequently.

In fact, many people know that renting Bidao, and recently there has been a certain range of shared charging treasures, many netizens said that they could not accept the price increase of shared charging treasures, because the usual shared charging treasures are usually very low, and it also facilitates people's lives, but the shared charging treasure quarrels again and again, but many consumers can not accept it, and would rather carry a charging treasure with themselves. There is also a shared bicycle, the ** of each ride of the shared bicycle has increased the air disadvantage compared with before, even if you open the card yourself, the price has increased, these are very common means of transportation in people's lives, but the price has increased unconsciously, and many consumers may reduce the frequency of use. <>

Two. The advent of "sharing" has indeed made people's lives easier.

Shared bicycles and shared charging treasure have brought a lot of convenience to people's lives, because now smart phones are very common, it is easy to go out without mobile phone power, shared charging treasure is a good choice for everyone, and there is a shared bicycle ** is very cheap, for commuting office workers, very economical. But the price increase again and again made everyone feel miserable, and some netizens even said that it was better to take the bus. <>

So what do you think about the behavior of sharing product price increases? Would you still choose to use it?

Because there are more users of sharing now and there is a customer base, the price has increased, and consumers will still pay because they are used to it.

As a direct result, at the beginning, these companies were losing money, so when the shared charging treasure market tends to stabilize, the brand will choose to increase the price. Consumers may continue to pay for this in the future, which is also because the current consumers are very dependent on mobile phones, and they are also afraid that their mobile phones will run out of battery

This is because the Gongwu Mingxiang economy shouted at the beginning that the cost of business input was too large, so the price would rise; I think that after the price increase, many consumers are reluctant to pay for it, because they will make a comparison with the previous ** and feel that they have lost money.

The refusal to increase prices is not a reason to increase the price of shared products, and if you blindly consider price increases, many people will not choose to use shared products. In particular, the shared charging treasure is to provide convenience for people's travel, but if you choose to increase the price from the convenience side alone. People can also choose not to use it, and it is not difficult to carry a power bank with them.

Most of the current shared products are mainly shared charging treasures and shared bicycles, when considering sharing, in fact, it provides convenience for people's lives, although it provides convenience, but this is definitely not the reason for the price increase of shared products, and the current prices are also followed, but the **** of shared products makes it difficult for ordinary people to accept. If the price of shared products is blindly increased, many people will not continue to use shared products.

I think it's normal, an item suddenly becomes popular, so it's not surprising that the price has risen, and they all want to make a little more, I think this is according to their own wishes, and they will pay if they think it is useful.

This is a very normal behavior, because the operating costs of shared products are increasing, and these companies can only choose to increase prices in order to operate normally and obtain profits.

I think it's normal for shared products to increase in price, because developers can only rely on price increases to recoup their costs.

I think there are traces to follow, because all prices are rising, and shared products will naturally go up as well.

The increase in the price of shared products is an increase in people's demand for shared products. It is also because many shared products are urgent supplies, so people have to choose, so it leads to price increases.