Back then, the little girl in Athens called on Chinese not to use chopsticks for the sake of enviro

Not recognized by the Chinese, chopsticks are the embodiment of traditional Chinese culture, a kind of inheritance, not a waste of resources.

In fact, this little girl was also complained about by others later, because her idea could not come true at all.

And then it was like that, the Chinese did not listen to her, after all, she was a foreign girl.

I don't think it's true that the Swedish environmental girl has publicly asked China to abandon the use of chopsticks。Although it is true that the use of chopsticks will cause environmental damage from the perspective of environmental protection, it is not only China that uses chopsticks, but also South Korea and Japan, and the use of chopsticks is a Chinese tradition, and it is not polite and upbringing to openly ask a country to abandon its traditional culture.

Of course, it is undeniable that supporting environmental protection is a very correct thing, but the word "demand" is a bit excessive, because as an environmental enthusiast, you only have the right to advocate, you have no right to ask others to do what you want, but you can use your own behavior to infect other people, so it is inappropriate to say that she made such remarks in public.

And although many restaurants and convenience stores provide disposable chopsticks for convenience, not all chopsticks in China are made of wood. Due to the continuous improvement of environmental awareness, there are now many chopsticks made of environmentally friendly materials, and Chinese have slowly developed the habit of bringing their own environmentally friendly chopsticks to minimize the use of disposable chopsticks. Therefore, because some chopsticks are made of wood, it is not feasible to ask Chinese to give up the use of chopsticks.

In addition, environmental awareness is slowly formed and cultivated, although China started slowly, but we can already see a lot of changes, so it is very inappropriate to publicly ask China to give up chopsticks. And the Swedish environmental girl is only targeting China, so why not South Korea or Japan? There are also a lot of disposable chopsticks in Japan, so from her remarks, I can't actually appreciate too much environmental protection, but I can see a lot of discrimination.

For a person who truly loves environmental protection, it is the right thing to do to infect the talents around him with his own behavior, rather than just relying on his mouth, so in my opinion, the behavior of Swedish environmental protection girls still has a sense of show.

Sensationalism, regardless of any conditions, will only shout to environmental protection, environmental protection is not to ban this kind of things that consume little and emit little. Only things that really pollute and waste a lot should be banned. However, disposable chopsticks can indeed reduce the use, and it is more environmentally friendly to carry them yourself.

Although she is known as an environmental girl, many of her environmental protection are just lip service, China is impossible to give up the use of chopsticks, and toilet paper is also made of wood, which is a necessity of life, and it is impossible to stop using it.

Most of the chopsticks are made of bamboo, made of trees, reducing the use of chopsticks can reduce the felling of trees and bamboo, but chopsticks have become a symbol of our nation, we will not ask for her opinion, we can make chopsticks stainless steel or resin.

Most chopsticks in China use bamboo. As we all know, the growing period of bamboo is very short. It can be planted on a large scale. It's trivial for the environment.

Eating is not environmentally friendly, you don't eat.

Something that has been handed down by our ancestors for thousands of years. If you say you don't need it, you don't need it.

This is the little kid who is hyped up by Western politicians and **.

The frog at the bottom of the well, why bother with it!

First of all, this was a few years ago, and the hot comment at the time was that it took thousands of years for human ancestors to invent chopsticks, so should they go back again???

Later, the little girl was suspected of putting on a show, because she promoted these environmental policies every day, but she herself was enjoying something that was not environmentally friendly.

Later, everyone didn't follow what she said, and still used chopsticks, but they also paid attention to saving and tried not to waste chopsticks anymore, but it was impossible not to use them.

Later, her popularity gradually increased, and then she hoped that people could pay attention to environmental protection in all aspects of her life, but she also caused a lot of doubts.

Later, it was sprayed miserably by our countrymen. After all, she didn't go through her brain at all when she said this, and she was completely.

We need to understand that advocacy is not the same as practicality. The use of chopsticks is the traditional culture of our country for thousands of years, and for the use of chopsticks, China advocates and implements the use of chopsticks, which is also more environmentally friendly.

Later, this idea must have been abandoned, because China has been eating with chopsticks since ancient times, and it is impossible, because his proposal is so compromised

Directly rejected by the Chinese, she did not think well when she made the proposal, there are many loopholes in what she said, and environmental protection can be carried out from many aspects, so it was directly rejected.

Later, she was criticized and abused by many netizens, and in order to reduce the impact of this incident, she also apologized and explained what she said, and finally got forgiveness from many netizens.

It was boycotted domestically, because environmental protection is not because China uses chopsticks, but because of large-scale deforestation.

Later, it still had a certain effect, but the effect was really not very large, because the vast majority of Chinese still use chopsticks.

Later, everyone didn't listen to her, because chopsticks are the quintessence of China and cannot be replaced by other things.

Because she thinks that chopsticks are made of trees, but she doesn't know that disposable chopsticks are made of bamboo, and bamboo, as a renewable resource, can be well used.

Since most of the chopsticks are made of wood, it does have a certain impact on the environment, so I think this suggestion can be promoted.

Because chopsticks are mainly made of bamboo, they need to be cut down in large quantities, which is not conducive to the protection of the ecological environment.