Can a noun definite clause be replaced by a noun clause?

Yes, the function of the noun clause is nothing more than to act as the subject, object, table or coposition in the sentence, and the noun + definite subordinate is still placed on the noun in the final analysis, and the above components can also be done, for example:

What he has is what I wantThis sentence contains a subject clause and a predicative clause, which can be interchangeable with the following sentences.

the thing he has is the thing i want.There are two rules here, understand?

The difference between a definite clause and a noun clause is as follows:First, the classification is different.

1. Noun clauses: object clauses, subject clauses, predicative clauses, and homonymous clauses.

2. Determinative clauses: Determinative clauses are divided into restrictive relative clauses and non-restrictive relative clauses.

Second, the components in the sentence are different.

1. Noun clauses: in compound sentences, they can serve as subjects, objects, predicates, homonyms, prepositional objects, etc.

2. Determinative clause: act as an adverbial and other components.

Third, the characteristics are different.

1. Noun clause: The noun clause is guided by a connecting word (or related word).

2. Determinative clause: The definite clause usually appears after the antecedent word and is elicited by the relative word (relative pronoun or relative adverb).

First of all, it is necessary to clarify the general definition of the clause and the noun clause (it doesn't matter if you can't understand it for the time being, if you understand it, you can understand it slowly) and the function.

The definite sentence plays a role of modification and qualification; A definite clause is a clause that modifies the preceding nouns, pronouns, etc. (antecedents) in the form of a sentence (clause), which is divided into two types: restrictive and non-restrictive.

The noun clause itself plays the role of a "noun", and will make a certain sentence component in the sentence (it can also be understood as a longer noun). For example, a long sentence is the subject, object, predicate, homonym, and so on.

A few simple differences:

There are no antecedents: definite clauses: yes, and antecedents can be put into the clause as components.

Noun clauses: subject, object, and predicative clauses do not have; There is a copositional clause, but the word does not make a component in the clause (i.e., the clause component is complete).

The definite clause acts as an adjective in a sentence, and the noun clause acts as a noun. Therefore, after the definite clause is removed, the original sentence is still intact; And if the noun clause is removed, the sentence is not smooth.

Case in point: the news that they told me excited me

the news that our team won excited me.

The conjunctions of both sentences are "that", but in the sentence, the antecedent "the news" can be used as an object in the that clause, that is, "they told me the news", and the that clause does play a role in modifying and limiting the news;

In the sentence, the clause "that our team won" is complete, the subject and verb are all there, and there is no lack of components, the news does not make components in the clause, and the homotopic clause of that is to explain the former, and the role of the news is the same, and the subject is used in the sentence.

I have been away from high school for more than half a year, and now I am studying in a language college in China, and I have almost forgotten it.

If there is anything wrong, please correct it.