In order to save his drowning companion, he died in Huangquan, why can t he be recognized as righteo

Updated on society 2024-06-11
19 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    In order to save his drowning companions, a boy who had just entered middle school fell into the water and died, which happened in Xuzhou on September 3, 2015, and the boy who rescued the rescue, a minor who had just entered junior high school, fell into the water and died. One of the parties believes that the child's behavior is to promote the traditional virtues of the Chinese nation and should be encouraged, and the other party believes that it is more reasonable for minors to save others while ensuring their own safety. <>

    Finally, the boy's actions were not defined as righteous and courageous, because minors were discouraged from engaging in acts that did not ensure their own safety. However, I believe that even if the boy is not awarded for his act of righteousness, he should be rewarded and condoled accordingly. This is not only a recognition of the boy's behavior, but also a comfort to his parents.

    The story of this incident is that the little boy Li Minghe and his companions went to the river to study, but at this time the river bank suddenly collapsed, one of the companions accidentally fell into the water, and with the efforts of many friends, the boy who fell into the water was rescued, but Li Minghe accidentally fell into the river, these friends could not swim, and in a panic, there was nothing to do, and finally Li Minghe drowned. Li Minghe's parents were heartbroken by this, believing that their child's behavior was a traditional virtue, and that the child had passed away and was useless, but at least they should strive for a place for their child, and should give their child the title of righteousness and bravery. <>

    However, what made Li Minghe's parents particularly sad was that the relevant departments did not award him the title of righteousness and bravery, and at the same time, the parents of the rescued little boy did not express too much gratitude, let alone material expression. Subsequently, Li Minghe's parents were furious and took the rescued boy's parents and the relevant person in charge of the pond to court. In the end, the court ruled that the person in charge of the pond was responsible for 20% of the responsibility and paid more than 80,000 yuan in compensation, and the parents of the rescued boy should also pay Li Minghe's parents 80,000 yuan.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Mainly because he is a minor, he does not advocate and discourage minors from saving others when they cannot guarantee their own safety. Therefore, it cannot be recognized as righteous and courageous.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Because the student is too young, the state does not recommend that minors act bravely in the face of righteousness, earthquake relief and other dangerous activities, so it cannot be recognized as righteous and courageous, and no encouragement is given, which can be regarded as a kind of protection for the safety of minors' lives.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    This may be different from the actual situation, if two people are playing in the water at the same time, but if they are not saved, they will judge the legal responsibility, which is an obligation that should be fulfilled, not a righteous and courageous act.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Because after all, it was him who went out with his friends, and the two did not pay attention to safety during the play, although he drowned to save his companions, so it cannot be determined.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because this child is actually a minor, and my country does not advocate or encourage minors to act bravely when they cannot ensure their own safety, it cannot be recognized as acting bravely.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Because he was still a minor at the time, only 12 years old, he did not have the ability to help others, but acted recklessly, resulting in his own death.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Because the premise of saving people can only be carried out under the condition of ensuring their own safety. If it is not guaranteed, try not to go to the rescue, which may lead to your own safety or increase the difficulty of subsequent rescue, and this behavior is not recommended.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    On September 1, 2015, Li had just entered junior high school, but on September 3, an accident happened, Li's parents received **, saying that your child fell into the pond, and then Li was salvaged ashore, unfortunately Li had no vital signs, Xiao Li's parents applied to the local relevant departments for righteousness and bravery, and the local relevant departments said that because Xiao Li is a minor, minors are not encouraged to act bravely by law, so the family's application was rejected.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Because this practice is not worth advocating. In such a situation, you should immediately call the police or seek help from an adult.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    When we are brave and courageous, we should ensure our own safety, and we should not let ourselves lose our lives because of saving others. This kind of "one life for one life" practice is not worth advocating, and it will also bring great pain and disaster to our loved ones. When encountering someone in distress, in addition to helping themselves, they should also mobilize the people around them to work together to save the people in danger.

    Summer is a period of high incidence of drowning incidents, and there are heroes who sacrifice their lives to save drowning people. In response to such a situation, we should draw lessons and lessons from experience, and while acting courageously, we also need to pay attention to the following two points.

    Behind each of us, there are loved ones.

    Existing, meeting strangers in danger on the road, lending a helping hand is a heroic act, and it is also worthy of our respect and learning. But before we save people, we should also weigh whether we are sure and whether we can help others in danger.

    If you are not sure about saving people, such as a person who is not familiar with the nature of water, rashly go into the water to save the person who has fallen into the water.

    It will only put yourself in danger. Before saving someone, it is important to think about whether you are capable of saving people and how to save them. Not only can it improve the efficiency of rescue, but it can also avoid putting yourself in danger.

    As the saying goes, "everyone gathers firewood and the flame is high", as long as everyone works together, we can come up with a better way to save people, and we can also rescue people in danger at the lowest cost.

    The strength of one person is limited, and if the strength of many people is gathered together, even if they don't know how to be in the water, they can come up with a way to rescue people who have fallen into the water. Righteousness and courage are not the same as fighting for oneself, and having courage and resourcefulness in rescue is more worthy of advocacy and learning.

    Children like to play in the water in the hot summer, as parents must strengthen supervision, do not let children play in unfamiliar waters, to avoid some dangerous situations.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    This is a reminder that we must consider our own safety when we are brave and courageous, and then act within our own capabilities.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It is necessary to pay attention to your body, and in addition, you must do what you can, if you can't do it, you still need to ask for help from others.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    When acting bravely, you should pay attention to it, do it according to your actual situation, and protect yourself.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    You need to pay attention to safety, your own safety is the most important, and you should rescue when conditions allow.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    I don't think it's worth it. I think the act of saving people is worth encouraging, but we must do what we can, there are many cases of saving people in our daily life, people are not saved, and the rescuer has lost his life, I think it is very cost-effective, before doing good deeds, we must first ensure the safety of their lives, and do not be able alone, we must have the courage to save people, but at the same time do not be too impulsive, to make good use of the surrounding environment, not only to protect themselves, but also to save the drowning in time.

    In Beijing, there are 5 children who fell into the river, and after a man found out, he immediately jumped into the water to save people, and finally successfully rescued the 5 drowning children, in fact, several people participated in the process of rescuing the children, but the man was exhausted, and eventually led to physical exhaustion, drowning also made people feel very sad, especially the children on the shore, still calling their fathers, but I didn't expect this to be the last goodbye.

    The man's death also brought endless grief to the family, the man is a young father, has a harmonious marriage, and is also an only child at home, his death will also bring infinite trauma to the family, the local ** also awarded the man a medal for righteousness and bravery, and this incident also brought us a warning, no matter what you do, you must consider your actual situation, to learn to do what you can, when the man does feel exhausted, you can choose to rest, you can also call for help to 4 weeks, Seek help from more people.

    Especially if a person is drowning, and then he likes to slap indiscriminately, if he risks going into the water to save people, he is likely to be pulled into the water, I think this kind of righteous and courageous deeds are worth encouraging, and I hope that more people will encounter this situation again, dare to stand up, don't turn a blind eye, and be sure to pay attention to the method when saving people, first of all, with the help of things that can be used next to it, such as ropes or bamboo poles, and secondly, to ask for help from all around.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    It's not worth it.

    Righteousness and courage deserve to be affirmed and praised, but righteousness and courage at the cost of one's own life are not worth it. In order to save 5 drowning children lost their precious lives, it was a huge blow to his own family, the drowning of 5 children was not directly related to him, his own children were only a few years old, he threw his children at the water's edge and jumped into the water to save people, and could not ensure his own safety, sacrificed his own life, paid a heavy price, affected the life of his wife and children, and let his parents suffer a huge blow, such a payment is not worth it.

    5 children drowned, it is sad to watch, and I want them to be rescued as soon as possible, but there are many ways to carry out rescue, and diving into the water to rescue is not the best choice. If you have super swimming skills or excellent physical fitness, you can ensure your own safety after entering the water, and saving people is the best choice. But when carrying out the rescue, don't forget that you are also an ordinary person, there are many uncertainties after entering the water, and you will face a lot of risks, you have to think about how they can continue to live if they have a wife, a son and parents, and if they lose their lives.

    In the face of 5 drowning children, need to rescue, should cooperate with the people on the shore to save people instead of lonely and brave to jump into the water to save people, without doing any safety precautions, jump into the water to rescue, the ability is limited, it is impossible to save all 5 children ashore, but also put yourself in danger. This brave man did not return to the shore, and all five drowning children, many of them, were rescued, but the man who rescued him lost his life forever.

    It is not worth it at all to rescue 5 drowning children at the cost of their own lives, because 5 children are drowning, the main responsible person is their parents, their own parents have no obligation to see supervision, they do not take good care of their children, let the children go to play in dangerous areas, they should pay for their own negligence, they should be responsible for their own actions and as a rescuer of strangers, there is no need to take their own lives for this, it is fair to their children and families.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    I don't think it's worth it, and some people may think that one life for five lives is not worth it? Yes, none of these families have lost their children, and they will feel very grateful. But what about your own family?

    Do you think it's worth it for your parents to never see their children anymore, and your children to see their dads anymore? Maybe I'm a bit cold-blooded, anyway, I don't think it's worth it, if it's within my ability, then whether it's five or 50 children, I'll definitely save it, but if it's within my ability, don't say it's 5, I won't save one. <>

    These children are a very big hope for their family, and if something happens to them, you may feel very devastated. But I am also the hope of my family, if something happens to me, then my parents will also be very broken, very sad. Therefore, it is absolutely impossible for me to trade my own life for someone else's.

    Then we are not saying that this hero is not praiseworthy, he is still very praiseworthy, we are just talking about things. If I had been in such a situation, I would not have done my best to save all of them. <>

    I'm not going to sit on the sidelines, but I'm not going to give all my energy, because I'm going to make sure I'm going to come back safely, I'm going to make sure I'm going to see my family. The act of exchanging lives for lives is really not worth advocating, although we say that we advocate righteousness and courage, but we must also protect it. Your own safety, if your own life is gone, then I don't think it's so important to be brave.

    If it is said that Jianyi and courage are to exchange their own lives for the lives of others, then I think the vast majority of people will be willing. Because living in this world, everyone's lives are equal, and I will not trade my life for the life of a stranger. <>

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    I think it's worth it, because borrowing this act should be commendable, so he lost his life, but his spirit is something we can learn from.

Related questions
12 answers2024-06-11

If you love Him, believe in Him. The relationship is most afraid that both parties will not trust each other, and such a relationship can easily break down. There are many female friends, but he doesn't care if he doesn't see one and loves the other, but if he explains it to you and you continue to make trouble, he may think that you are very unreasonable and that it is not a good choice to choose you. >>>More

28 answers2024-06-11

This kind of man is not as good as a brute.

17 answers2024-06-11

Calling Kobe Bryant should be in line with the habits of Chinese and foreigners. >>>More

13 answers2024-06-11

The first question: Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty built Huo Quai's tomb next to his mausoleum, first, to commend his merits, secondly, to set an example for other generals, thirdly, to show the emperor's grace, and fourthly, to hope that others could serve the country like Huo Quzhi. >>>More

10 answers2024-06-11

Yang Guang's crown prince is Yang Zhao, the prince of Yuande, who died earlier than Yang Guang. The second son is Yang Xuan, the king of Qi, who is close to the villain and is hated by Yang Guang. Yang Yu, the acting king, was the son of Yang Zhao, and was later proclaimed emperor by Li Yuan in Chang'an, reigning for one year.