A 12 year old boy rescued a classmate who fell into the water and drowned, should he be recognized a

This situation should be recognized as righteous and courageous, and the boy died to rescue his classmates who fell into the water, and there is an act of righteousness and courage.

It must be identified as righteous and courageous, because this boy also caused himself to drown in order to save his classmates who fell into the water, which is an act of righteousness and bravery.

A 12-year-old boy drowned in order to save his classmates who fell into the water, of course, he can be recognized as righteous and brave, after all, the boy also died to save people.

Should. Although this practice is not advocated, and he should hurry to find someone to help instead of going into the water himself, this spirit is good.

In our daily life, as long as every summer vacation, the relevant departments will issue relevant notices, requiring students not to swim in the lake during the summer vacation, because there are several incidents of students swimming in the lake and drowning every year. When encountering this kind of thing, parents will always be very painful, because many parents do not have the means to take care of their children at home around the clock, so when their children go to swim in the river, parents do not know. There are many warm-hearted people who go down to the river to rescue children when they see them swimming and drowning, and according to news reports, a man drowned in the process of rescuing a drowning child.

I think the impact of this kind of incident on society is still very huge. Although every year the national department will issue a notice asking parents to let their children not go to the river to play or swim in the river during the summer vacation, but every year there are still endless cases of children drowning in the river. After such a thing, parents will also feel very scared, and children will also feel that their lives are relatively important when they see such news, so this kind of news is likely to serve as a warning to everyone.

But for the man's family, this is actually not a very good thing, because this heroic man who saved people chose to save the drowning child at this time, and kindness did not play any role at this time, but let himself drown in the lake. During this period, many people do not know how to deal with it, and only very brave and desperate people will go down to the river to save people.

I believe that many people will be very sad when they see this news, and they will think twice about going down to the river to save people the next time they encounter this situation. Therefore, in the face of the situation of summer vacation, parents should take good care of their children, and must not drown in the river because of their children's playfulness

I think the world has a very positive impact on society, and through these worlds, we can see that there are still a lot of people who are good and right, and their impact on the country and their children is also very significant, but we should also protect our own safety when we treat other people.

This incident has had a very big impact on the society, and it has also brought a certain warning to everyone, when you are brave in the face of righteousness, you should first protect yourself.

This incident has caused a particularly strong response in the society, and everyone is also very moved by the boy, and they are also very heartbroken for the child's tragic experience.

"Righteous and courageous acts" refers to citizens' conduct of fighting against all kinds of violations and crimes or providing emergency and disaster relief in order to protect the national or collective interests or the personal and property safety of others, regardless of their personal safety, in addition to performing specific obligations.

Sacrificing one's life to save one's relatives should be regarded as righteous and courageous, because the rescue of relatives is an act of fulfilling a legal obligation rather than performing one's duties, and drowning to save a friend can be more determined to be a righteous and courageous act.

According to the law, it can be recognized as righteous and courageous:

First, they have the courage to fight against violations and crimes, and their deeds are outstanding;

Second, in the event of a disaster or accident, regardless of personal safety, the courage to rescue, and outstanding deeds;

Third, there are other acts of righteousness and courage, and the deeds are outstanding.

1. Whether death caused by failure to provide assistance is considered a crime.

Whether death is a crime due to the failure to provide assistance due to an obligation to rescue needs to be determined on the basis of the actual circumstances. They are:

1. Where a passer-by is injured and can be rescued but is not rescued resulting in death, it does not constitute a crime. If there is an obligation to rescue but failure to do so constitutes a crime, laws and regulations do not stipulate that the general public has the obligation to rescue the injured, and if the failure to rescue leads to death, it is not a crime or a crime, but only a violation of morality and ethics;

2. However, if it is a policeman, a doctor or an ambulance who is leaving the car, it has the obligation to rescue the injured, and if it can be saved but fails to save the injured person, it may constitute dereliction of duty.

What are the conditions that must be met if death is not saved if it constitutes a crime?

1. The perpetrator has an obligation to do a certain positive act, which is a prerequisite for the omission to constitute a crime;

2. If the perpetrator has a real possibility to perform a specific obligation but fails to do so, but for some reason does not have the actual possibility of performing that obligation, it does not constitute a criminal omission;

3. The actor's omission to perform a specific obligation leads to the occurrence of a harmful result, that is, there is a causal relationship between the omission and the harmful result.

Article 183 of the Civil Code provides that if oneself suffers damage due to the protection of the civil rights and interests of others, the tortfeasor shall bear civil liability, and the beneficiary may give appropriate compensation.

Where there is no infringer, the infringer has escaped, or is unable to bear civil liability, and the victim requests compensation, the beneficiary shall give appropriate compensation.

A 16-year-old boy is suspected of being misled by two girls into the river to save people and drown, and the girl needs to bear legal responsibility. Because of this case, two girls were cheating.

At present, it is only suspected that they have been misled, so it is uncertain whether the two girls will be held legally responsible.

Legal liability is divided into criminal liability and civil liability, on criminal liability, the life of the dog cannot be measured by the safety of the person, the behavior of the two girls misleading others to go down to the river to save the dog, suspected of negligence causing death, but it is difficult to really determine the crime, it is necessary to combine the scene environment, the girl's mind and other factors to determine whether the two girls can foresee that their fraudulent request for help will lead to the death of others.

In terms of civil liability, the two girls are under the age of 18, and in order to limit their capacity for civil conduct, the families of the boys who died can demand that their guardians bear tort liability and humanitarian compensation.