Which exercise is better, running 2000 meters a day or walking for an hour?

Updated on healthy 2024-06-05
14 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    It's safe to say that no matter how far you walk, it's nowhere near as intense as running.

    You can feel to yourself that you have walked a long way to exercise, and the intensity of sweating and heartbeat is not strong at all compared to running, and it comes slowly.

    Many 40-year-old people think that they are not suitable for strong sports, but they don't know: people are animals themselves! You can confidently say:

    At present, the amount of exercise that ordinary people do not exercise all day is concerned, and it cannot reach super intensity. People are naturally athletic, if you just walk no different from daily walking, but the day is longer, such exercise is too 'gentle', will not have any good effect, look at the morning those who get up early, but exercise less old people will find that the intensity is not enough is just a waste of time.

    I suggest you still choose to run, running for n minutes can make your heart beat and breathe fast, the exercise effect is obvious, saving time.

    But you don't have to run 2,000 meters every day, you have the final say on how far you run.

    Are all of my people satisfied?

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    If the body is okay, it must be a good running exercise. Walking for an hour has little effect. As long as you pay attention to the preparation of the exercise, you will not be injured if you wear the right shoes.

    However, it is best to jog to the extent that the body feels comfortable when sweating, and to do proper stretching and relaxation after exercise, so that strength and flexibility can be increased. If you are 2 kilometers, the amount of exercise per day is okay. However, it can also be increased appropriately over time.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I think it's better to walk for an hour, running 2,000 meters every day, and the exercise is more intense, but it's much better to walk.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Running backwards. Some experts said that the structure of the human body given by the Creator was originally only adapted to move forward, and if it was abnormal, it would be particularly awkward. If you want to be more efficient and move faster, you're going to have to put in a lot more physical effort.

    To prove that their reasoning was not a pipe figgernade, the experimenters invited 10 volunteers to participate in this energy-intensive physiological experiment on medical science and sports. As the expert expected, the reverse march was 31% higher in oxygen requirements, a 15% faster heartbeat, and higher levels of lactate in the blood. The root cause of this physiological change is that traveling in the opposite direction increases the difficulty of the movement, forcing people to consume more oxygen and calories.

    It takes less time and has a great effect, and the reverse march can strengthen the thigh muscles.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Considering your age, if you are still in good health, it is better to jog for two thousand meters, two kilometers is too little, and run five kilometers. But take your time, and walk fast at first if you can't run. Even if you walk slowly for four hours, I don't think the effect is as good as running for half an hour.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    It's definitely better to walk for an hour! Because running is strenuous exercise.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    2000 meters is too strenuous and only muscles are exercised, which is anaerobic exercise.

    Slow walking is an aerobic exercise that exercises the organs of the whole body, and considering your age, it is better to do the latter.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Good walking. Running is harder.

    There are walks on it.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Note that jogging and brisk walking are aerobic exercises, and you can choose one of the above bases.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    It's hard to stick to running, but it's okay to stick to walking.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It's not bad to run! It's up to you how you run!

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Walking is aerobic exercise, and running 2000 meters is anaerobic exercise. Which do you say is better?

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    It's not good to walk.

    Take your time in everything.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    1. Running is a kind of aerobic breathing exercise, and fat begins to burn after 20 minutes of running.

    2. Insisting on running can strengthen metabolism, delay the degenerative changes of bones, and prevent the occurrence of senile bone and joint diseases, so that you can delay aging.

    3. During exercise, the frequency and efficacy of heart beating are greatly improved, and the elasticity of heartbeat, blood pressure and blood vessel wall also increases. Trained athletes can take 33 to 60 percent more oxygen than the average person.

    4. Through running, the blood supply and oxygen supply to the brain can be increased by 25%, so that the quality of sleep at night will also be improved.

    5. Long-term exercise helps improve sexual performance.

Related questions
24 answers2024-06-05

Drink in the morning. Trust me. Someone who came over.

11 answers2024-06-05

The start must be fast! You can't think about conserving your strength and not try your best at first. >>>More

5 answers2024-06-05

Fascinated by the light dance of the snow, fascinated by the serenity and serenity of the snow.

17 answers2024-06-05

400 meters is about 70-90 seconds, but due to the different physical qualities between people, the actual time taken is also different. >>>More

15 answers2024-06-05

Hello friends! I am a sports maniac, 20 years of teaching and training, I am happy to serve you, your problem: 200 meters special run 27 seconds! >>>More