How do you write an essay about a debate?

One day in October, our class held a debate in the classroom on "Honesty and White Lies."

The debate began, and we were divided into two main factions, one for the pros and one for the diss. The positive view is not to lie and to be honest, while the opposing view is to tell a white lie. Gan Jun, who was square, stood up and said:

On behalf of the positive side, to tell a lie is to lie, and if everyone justifies a white lie, there will be no truth in the world. As soon as the words fell, there was warm applause. Our opponent Mak Jie Lun stood up confidently and said:

I disagree with the positive argument that sometimes white lies are a way to guide and encourage people. Our students on the other side looked at us with admiration. Li Liwei, a student from the square, said meaningfully

I think white lies make people lose sight of their weaknesses and self-righteousness. The teacher looked at Li Liwei with appreciation, and Liang Yan on the other side said, "White lies build confidence.

Just like in Lesson 11, the only audience, if the old professor does not say that he is deaf, it is impossible for the author to regain his confidence and perform in front of thousands of audiences. Listened to this sentence. The classmates in the audience whispered.

The teacher clapped his hands, and the classmates immediately fell silent, and the teacher said earnestly: "In life, sometimes white lies are due, but people must be honest, and don't tell anything that hurts others." "After listening to the teacher's words, I feel that in society, we must be honest.

White lies are not unspeakable, but should be used in appropriate places to guide education.

On the afternoon of April 6, a heated debate was held in accordance with the requirements of the language book "Oral Communication".

Topic: Is scientific development good or bad?

Positive: Lida Positive: Yin Ming.

Deng Yanru. Oppose: Negative argument: Xiao Xin.

Qi Shuqi. First of all, Yin Ming, the chief defender of the positive side, expounded the positive side's point of view: because of the development of science and technology, our average life expectancy has increased by 30 years, and we can even contact relatives and friends thousands of miles away without leaving home.

Therefore, the development of science and technology is beneficial!

A heated debate ensued.

As the bell rang for the end of class, everyone began to rest.

After the break, the main argument is that China's 8,000-year-old cultural history is the best evidence to prove the benefits of science and technology, history is changing all the time, and there may be an event that will go down in history. Science and technology are changing all the time, it is sad for a person not to progress, a country is declining if it is not progressing, and it is dark for a world to not progress, and only in continuous progress can human life be sublimated.

To sum up, it can be seen that science and technology are the only driving force for human progress.

Argument: If there is no technological development, can you last for 1 week without electricity, no play, no TV, no computer, etc.?

Again: We are only pointing out the disadvantages of technological development, not not using it, please pay attention to our intentions.

After the teacher concluded.

"I walked into the classroom very excitedly, and I was in a very happy mood because this class was going to carry out a debate on "whether the development of science and technology is good or bad", and I prepared for a day, and I decided to defeat the opponent in the debate.

When the teacher wanted to elect a few delegates, I volunteered to be the first to raise my hand, and just like that, I walked to the square, confidently waiting for the debate to begin.

The debate began, first by our side to state the point of view, so, we straight to the point, put forward the view that "science and technology can promote the development of history and make the country strong", the opposing side immediately retorted that science and technology will become pollution, I am not to be outdone, proposed that science and technology can also make the environment better, such as air fresheners, I didn't expect it,

Classes have been held, and today we are finally looking forward to the long-awaited debate, the pros and cons, divided into two rows of six people from the north and south, lined up on the left and right sides of the podium. With the title of "Is it beneficial to open the book", I only listened to the host's order, and at this time, the members of the team were like a few soldiers on standby, all eager to try, as if the order was issued, and they would rush to the battlefield immediately. Looking at the heroic and high-spirited opponents, they seem to be confident.

In the end, who will die of the deer will have to be **.

The debate began, and the positive side seized the opportunity with a preemptive strategy, only to see the corner of the positive team member smile on the corner of his mouth. But the first shot of the opposing side was not bad, and our team withstood the opponent's powerful offensive in the form of famous quotes.

Seeing the audience's eyes widen, our little rabbit's heart was pounding, thinking: No, the other party still has a "good show" and said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness."

Unexpectedly, the opponent also used the same way, and returned a bullet, and the bullets of the positive and negative sides collided together, grinding out a spark of wisdom, which made my eyes light up, and I retorted, "It is a medicine that is poisonous, and books are no exception." Those who support the opposition applaud, but the positive side still has no fear, which is incomprehensible to me.

The positive side finally came out of the trump card, this is a bad thing, the morale of our army has plummeted, and the classmates who support the positive and negative shouted, "Good! Good!

Good! The personnel on the positive side even said a few words to discourage our army. Our team also gave them a blow, this blow is really beautiful, the positive side is not so excited, but the positive side still spoke:

Read more than 10,000 volumes, and write like a god". We retort that "it is better to travel thousands of miles than to read thousands of books". The opposing team members gradually turned from passive to active, and the students who supported the opposing side applauded again, and some even wrote the words "the opposing side will win" on cardboard.

After class, I still didn't know the winner or loser, but I understood a truth: in fact, the combination of positive and negative views is a perfect point of view, and I must read more books and read good books in the future.

The bell rang crisply, and a debate on "whether opening the book is beneficial" began in a tense and intense atmosphere. When I stood up, I thought I had a little rabbit in my hand, and I was jumping around. I strike preemptively:

In this information-based world, reading books is one of the main ways for us to acquire knowledge. Reading more books can broaden our knowledge, enrich our literary accomplishment, and be of great help to both speaking and writing in the future. The other party, Chen Xiaoying, said aggressively

The ancients said: "Open the book is beneficial." Indeed, we cannot deny that.

However, in modern society, we have learned from the ancients' saying that "opening the book is beneficial", because we believe that "opening the book is not necessarily beneficial". Of course, the saying that "opening the book is not necessarily beneficial" does not mean that reading more books is not beneficial, but that reading more unhealthy books will have an impact on the body and mind, and there is no benefit. When you read more unhealthy books, your poisoning will get deeper and deeper, and you will fall into the abyss, never having a chance to turn over, what a tragic fate it must be!

So the argument is: do the so-called bad books have some benefit of their own? As far as the benefits of reading are concerned, the power is so great that it makes people realize their mistakes, change their past mistakes, go to the bright road, and achieve success; Xiao can learn a few writing methods, a few words, and even recognize a few words.

These are the benefits of reading, and there is no denying it. Therefore, no matter how bad it is, at least some writing methods can be learned in the so-called bad books, and no matter how bad it is, you can learn a few words. Can this be said to be unhelpful?

Chen Xiaoying also said: "What if many teenagers read books that they shouldn't read and go down the road to crime? Chen Kaishan of our group immediately stood up and said:

The young people who commit crimes on TV are all caused by going to Internet cafes and other places to play games without reading!! The other party was stunned and speechless.

Chen Xiaoying and I argued word by word, everyone can add what they can, find information for those who are looking for information, and finally the teacher wants us to summarize it. I said, "Books are the friends of mankind!" Chen Xiaoying said: "Some books can cause people to be damaged!! ”

Although this debate is difficult for us to distinguish, whether it is up or down, it has made me know that we must have a choice when reading books, we must read good books, put an end to bad books, and serve the motherland in the future!!

Today, our class held a fierce debate competition. It's a fierce debate. In this debate competition, all the students said that the head is the Tao, and each has its own great truth.

In this debate, I am no exception. We are talking about whether elementary school students should watch TV or not, and the positive side agrees, while the negative side disagrees. Although I am on the right side, I don't think the right opinion can be taken.

The reason for this is that it can bring our primary school students closer to nature. The arguments of the opposing side are; Watching too much TV can do a lot of damage to our eyesight and academic performance.

I think there are some problems with both of these reasons. The word "appropriate" should also be added to the square, because it is not good for us to look at it more, and it should be seen appropriately! I have a small question for our pair.

I also have a small question for the opposing side: we can see it from the proper angle!

This is the end of the fierce debate competition, although this debate competition has ended, but it will always echo in my mind, so I can't forget it, I am so happy, so happy.

I want answers! My teacher asked me to write and play with the whole science workbook!! I'm so miserable!

I can't even play the computer for 1 second! Look at my pitiful and give me the answer! I'm so pathetic!

Heaven, earth, give me the answer! Please, pull!

Debate is a fun activity that can train our thinking skills and expression skills. In a debate competition, we need to debate according to the topic, expressing our opinions through arguments and refutations. Below, I will explain how to write a debate essay from three aspects: preparation, expression, and summary.

First and foremost, preparation is the key to a successful debate tournament. In the preparation phase, we need to understand the topic, gather relevant information, and organize our ideas. We can improve our level of preparation by reading relevant books, searching the internet, participating in debate training, etc.

In the process of preparation, we also need to understand the opponent's views and arguments in order to better refute them.

Secondly, expression is at the heart of the debate. In the process of expressing Wang Shen, we need to state our opinions and arguments clearly, and support our opinions through good logic and facts. We need to pay attention to the accuracy and fluency of our language, but also to the proper wording and avoid using overly intense or offensive language.

In the process of expression, we also need to pay attention to listen to the other party's point of view in order to better refute it.

Finally, the conclusion is the end of the debate competition. In the summary, we need to review our own opinions and arguments and highlight our strengths and highlights. At the same time, we also need to summarize the opponent's views and arguments and make appropriate rebuttals.

In the process of summarizing, we need to pay attention to the conciseness and clarity of the language, but also pay attention to the confidence and determination of the expression.

In short, the debate competition is a very meaningful activity, which can exercise our thinking skills and expression skills. When participating in the debate competition, we need to focus on three aspects: preparation, expression and summary, so as to better play our strengths and win.

Actually, the essay should be written by yourself, and I can provide the following clues: 1Grasp the demeanor, movements, and language of the students, and describe them delicately 2

Use more good words and sentences 3Write some philosophical sentences, be poetic, and summarize them in the hope that it will help you (*hee-hee......

I'm sorry, I'm still writing, and I'll tell you the answer when I'm done.

I don't know, I'm sorry to write.

I want answers! My teacher asked me to write and play with the whole science workbook!! I'm so miserable!

I can't even play the computer for 1 second! Look at my pitiful and give me the answer! I'm so pathetic!

Heaven, earth, give me the answer! Please, pull!

At noon today, in the classroom of the sixth class of the fifth grade, a special debate meeting was held, and when the class teacher announced the official start: First of all, the argument of the positive side put forward the other side's point of view that "opening the book is beneficial", and I am a member of the opposing side, and I am also a member of the opposing side, and the opposing side of the argument is: "The opening of the book may not be beneficial."

Then Yang Yuhan, the second argument of the positive side, said the argument and cited the scriptures to argue. Not to be outdone, Yang Ya, the second defense of the opposing side, listed three points, first of all:

Books are good and bad, secondly, there is a difference between good and evil purposes, and finally: there is a difference between the right and wrong methods of reading, and three examples are listed.

When the three debates of the positive side put forward his point of view, he stuttered a little, which seemed to be found by our three arguments Luo Yuanyuan, so she thought that primary and secondary school students were addicted to those martial arts ** due to the pressure of studying, so it can be proved that "opening the book may not be beneficial".

However, Huang Yinjia, the fourth argument on the positive side, said that she performed very well, but Zhong Lingxin, the fourth argument of the opposing side, was not intimidated by this momentum, Zhong Lingxin stood up, and after summarizing the opposing party's point of view, she sat down confidently.

Now for the next step. At the behest of the chairman. The members of the positive side then ask questions of the members of the opposing side.

In this way, a "war of words" began. The first argument on the positive side asked a question about our second argument, which didn't seem to be our second argument Yang Ya, she stood up confidently and answered this "simple" question, and the next one was even more exciting.

Finally, it's time to decide the winner, both of us have taken out their "killer features", in this fierce "war", everyone put forward a firm point of view, everyone has tried their best to speak for this point of view, the first defense of the positive and negative Zou Yang Luyao said: "If the book may not be beneficial" then where do we learn knowledge? Liu Jiazhou, the third argument of the pros and cons, said:

Reading is like adding water to a reservoir, as long as you keep filling it with water, you can get smarter and smarter. The first argument of the opposing side is me: some students read books just to get praise.

I didn't read it carefully, and many of them just read the storyline, and didn't appreciate the artistic value and profound connotation of the book, so they didn't benefit. The second argument of the opposing side is that there is a difference between good and bad books, good and evil.

Therefore, it is necessary to read good books, but some students do not understand this point of view, so opening the book may not be beneficial.

After this debate, we were tied, but it made us understand that there are good and bad books, and we should read more good books in order to make people progress.