Why do hens don t need roosters to lay eggs?

Birds don't need to mate to lay eggs, so hens don't need to find a rooster to mate before they can lay eggs.

However, if the hen does not mate with a rooster, the egg laid is an infertile egg, just an egg cell (single cell), which cannot hatch chicks and can only be eaten by humans. Therefore, if the chicken farm raises laying hens and is not a breeder, such hens do not need to mate.

Eggs before fertilization are called inseminate eggs and cannot hatch chicks.

The eggs after mating are not necessarily fertilized eggs, if they cannot be fertilized due to pathological reasons or the time does not coincide, the eggs are about to be laid, and the mating is for the eggs that cannot hatch chicks. Only eggs that mate and successfully complete fertilization are useful and can hatch chicks.

In order for the eggs to hatch chicks, it must be helped by roosters. Only fertilized eggs can become chicks, hens lay eggs is an instinct, whether they have copulation with a rooster or not, hens can lay eggs.

It's a life instinct of the hen, it's a life instinct of the hen, and it doesn't need a rooster to lay eggs.

Although hens can lay eggs without mating with roosters, this kind of eggs can only be eaten, and chicks cannot hatch, and if this continues, chickens will gradually become extinct, so if you want to breed the next generation for a long time, roosters are necessary.

At that time, the rooster could also lay eggs, but he was afraid that his hens would be laid off.

Hens don't need roosters to lay eggs, but hens lay eggs that are oligopolis and can't hatch chicks. If no roosters exist, then the population of chickens in nature would be extinct. Hens will have offspring because of the presence of roosters.

This is also the same as humans, women can ovulate without men, but do not produce offspring. Women have men to produce offspring!

Raw eggs. It is the innate nature of hens, and it is also the unique physiological function of hens compared to roosters, which has nothing to do with whether there is a rooster or not.

In other words, as long as it is a hen, it should be born with the ability to lay eggs and lay eggs. Otherwise, it is not a qualified, functioning hen.

In this way, perhaps the subject will feel that the question he raised is indeed very correct and normal, and the rooster in the world really has no meaning of existence.

I think it's a special physiological phenomenon in birds. You see, all the birds that are females, not all males, without exception, can lay eggs.

Of course, the rooster has a meaning of existence, the hen is not inseminated by the rooster, and the eggs laid are infertile eggs and can only be eaten by people, it cannot hatch chicks. The rooster plays the role of reproduction, how can it be said that there is no meaning? It makes a lot of sense!

The matching of roosters and hens is generally according to a rooster, with eight to ten hens is enough, it can ensure that each hen lays eggs, fertile eggs can reach more than 90%, and there are also a small number of infertile eggs, commonly known as "oligopolized eggs".

Chickens are avian and oviparous animals.

The hen will lay eggs naturally. The role of the rooster is to inseminate the hen's eggs, and without the rooster insemination, the hen's eggs cannot hatch the chicks. If only human eggs could also develop into children outside the body, women would not have to bear the pain and danger of giving birth.

Chickens are oviparous, no oviparous animal does not need to mate, and the same is true for hens, female oviparous animals can undergo internal fertilization to lay eggs, but eggs that have not undergone fertilization cannot hatch chicks.

It is an instinct of a hen to lay eggs without a rooster, but this kind of egg is not fertilized, which means that it cannot hatch chicks. If it can be mated with a rooster, the eggs laid by the hen can hatch chicks.

This is because chickens are originally an oviparous animal, and usually laying eggs belongs to ovulation, so it has little to do with fertilization.

First of all, the rooster does not have a penis. Therefore, the process of chicken fertilization is to dump the chrysanthemum of the rooster against the chrysanthemum of the hen, so as to complete the fertilization process.

Secondly, hens can lay eggs without fertilization, but they cannot hatch chicks because they are not fertilized. It's like a girl's aunt.

Thirdly, the hen mates once, and the time to lay fertile eggs is 3-21 days.

Bird eggs are egg cells that are laid at a certain time, but only fertilized ones hatch.

The hen does not need a rooster to lay eggs, but the eggs it lays cannot hatch chicks, and if there is no rooster to grow into a chicken in nature, it will be extinct, because of the existence of a rooster, there will be offspring of chickens, and in case of danger, the attack can also protect the hen to a certain extent.

Because the egg is not fertilized, there is no way for such an egg to hatch and give birth to chicks.

Because when the hen lays eggs, it can be salted into eggs through its own eggs and proteins; Roosters have the meaning of existence, and if there are roosters, then the eggs produced by the hens are fertilized eggs.

This is because the eggs laid by the hen are not fertilized eggs, so the eggs can be laid without a rooster, and the meaning of the existence of the rooster is to be able to reproduce, and the eggs laid by the hen themselves cannot hatch chicks.

This is because the rooster needs to mate with the hen, which lays the eggs through fertilized eggs. The reason for the existence of the rooster is to mate, to reproduce.

This is because the rooster needs to mate with the hen in order to fertilize the egg. The purpose of the rooster's existence is to reproduce.

The hen can lay eggs as soon as it ovulates, and the significance of the rooster is to pass on the lineage, and only fertilized eggs can hatch into chicks.