Which format is more suitable under XP and what format is XPS

Make model: MacBookPro

System: <>XPS is an electronic file format with fixed layout, which is a document saving and viewing specification developed by Microsoft. The specification itself describes the format and the rules for distributing, archiving, displaying, and processing XPS documents.

XPS has a file sharing function, which allows users to view or print the file without the need to own the software that created the file, which is a powerful tool for Microsoft to fight against the Adobe PDF format. **When viewing or printing an XPS file, you can be sure that it is in the same format as you want it to be, and that the data in the file cannot be easily changed by other users.

XPS documents have a standardized physical organization and logical structure. The physical organization is the package made up of the individual document parts, while the Logo-Lee organization is a hierarchical structure formed by the mutual reference between the document parts. XPS files are stored in a zip file, called a package, and the compression of XPS files follows OPC (Open Packaging Conventions).

In terms of file physical structure, XPS Document is a compressed ZIP archive package, which can be used to recover some of the wasted space efficiency due to its use of XML-based language. The basic element of an archived package is a part. The hierarchical relationship between the parts and the mutual references between the parts is the logical structure of XPS.

The parts of an XPS document are organized in a logical hierarchy, with the Fixed Document Sequence part at the top level. An XPS package may contain multiple Fixed Documents, and the order of these documents is determined by the order in which they are placed in the Fixed Document Sequence.

XP system, if it is a host hard disk, it is better to use NTFS and FAT32. If it is a portable hard disk, it is better to use NTFS.

If you are using a high-capacity flash drive, it is better to use Exfat, but note that XP must be upgraded to SP3 or higher.

The characteristics and limitations of the most common file systems are as follows:

FAT32: This one is generally for small hard drives, such as 40G. The advantage is that the compatibility is the best, and it can be read by Apple and mobile phones, and the disadvantage is that a single file cannot be larger than 4GB.

NTFS: This is currently the most widely used format on PCs, and there is no problem with a single file exceeding 4G. The disadvantage is that it reads and writes frequently, so it is not suitable for use in flash drives such as USB flash drives. This is recommended for portable hard drives.

exfat: This one is specially launched by Microsoft to solve the shortcomings of FAT32, and it is dedicated to flash drives. It does not have the disadvantage of the short lifespan of NTFS, and it can also enlarge the file.

Flash drives are preferred. But the biggest disadvantage of this format is that it has the worst compatibility, many smart devices and even operating systems can't recognize it, and XP versions before SP3 can't recognize it.

If the system disk is NTFS, it is OK. Other disks don't matter.

In summary, the XP system is more suitable for installation under NTFS. It doesn't have to be uniform between plates.

The general depth system is NTFS format, while the computer company's FAT32 format. The NTFS format is a non-self-test when the computer is turned off abnormally. Therefore, it is recommended that you use NTFS format!!

I have used both formats, I think it is good to use either format, there is almost no difference, I have a machine, the hard disk has bad sectors, fat32 is not easy to use, I use NTFS.

The new computer, of course, is NTFS. There are no software compatibility concerns anymore. NTFS format is supported. ~！

s:169]

s:169]

F32 supports a single file up to 4G, and the total capacity is less than 32G, which is convenient when there is a problem to enter the DOS processing. The security of NTFS is better, and problems can not be dealt with under DOS, so PE should be used!

Most of the current SP3 uses NTFS, but the backup system is a bit big.

This is not very important. You can go to the Internet to see the difference. However, I generally use the NTFS format, which produces less file fragmentation and higher disk utilization.

Each file in a FAT32 partition takes up a lot of space, while each file in an NTFS partition takes up less (NTFS uses smaller clusters to manage disk space more efficiently). In the case of Win XP's FAT32 file system, the size of the cluster is 4KB when the partition size is 2GB 8GB; When the partition size is 8 GB and 16 GB, the cluster size is 8 KB; When the partition size is 16 GB and 32 GB, the cluster size is 16 KB. In the NTFS file system of Win XP, when the size of the partition is less than 2GB, the size of the cluster is smaller than that of the corresponding FAT32 cluster. When the size of the partition is more than 2 GB (2 GB 2 TB), the size of the cluster is 4 KB.

In contrast, NTFS can manage disk space more effectively than FAT32, avoiding the waste of disk space to the greatest extent), NTFS is equivalent to each file occupies less space, if it is not NTFS format partition, it is recommended to format NTFS partition, partition is FAT32 partition format, it is recommended to change to NTFS partition format, hard disk space will save a lot. FAT32 doesn't support a single file over 2G, so you'll need to change to the NTFS method: Start-Run input convert x:

fs: ntfs x is the drive letter you want to change.

In fact, the most popular XP is actually the following versions: Windows XP Professional (Professional Edition), Windows XP Home (Home Edition), Windows XP SP1 (Professional Edition), and Windows XP SP2.

There is also a ghost version of XP, which is specially made and there are many versions.

Personally, I still think that the non-Ghost version of Windows XP SP1 original installation disc is the best to use! To be free of activation, such as the Russian cracked version. sp2 has compatibility problems with some programs, it is recommended not to clone and install it with the ghost version of the Shanghai ** version, although it is relatively fast, but there are also many drawbacks.

This installation disk uses the ghost method to clone the XP system together with some commonly used software to your hard disk, there are a lot of them sold outside, there are ** on the Internet, but it is very large, almost the capacity of a CD, about five or six hundred megabytes, it will take a long time, and after getting down, you have to use the software and recorder to make it into a disc to use, this kind of disc has a common feature, it can start the computer, provided that you set up the computer in CMOS to start from the optical drive first.

But it's not recommended for you to use this kind of disc, why? Because although it is very convenient, but the disadvantages are also very large, the system is modified, and the integrated software is installed for you regardless of whether you need it or not, and often many software versions have fallen behind. Although this kind of disk can be adapted to almost all machines, but some functions can be greatly reduced, you think about it, everyone's computer is different, it must ensure that each one can be used, can it be perfectly realized?

No, so, it's better to install XP step by step, then install the software that suits you, and finally back up with ghost, which is the wisest thing to do.

Of course, the clone disk of XP is not useless.,It's very good to use it as a boot disc.,Although a floppy disk can also be a boot disk.,But it's easy to break.,Make good use of the ghost in the boot disc will bring you a lot of convenience.,And generally there are a lot of very practical tools in the boot menu of this disc.,But don't use it blindly if you're not familiar with it.。

I like to use this kind of disc very much, I have several copies on hand, I rely on it to restore the system, to deal with problems, to enter DOS, it is a tool that I can't live without, but I never install the clone version of XP inside.