Argument for help Literary talent is more important than eloquence Urgent need for help

Updated on Financial 2024-06-29
5 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Played this one in the semi-finals before and won. Let's talk about experience.

    1. The argument of the other party is nothing more than that oral communication is very important in the real society. Here, you have to explain that eloquence is actually different from oral communication ability. The average person, if there is no accident, has a certain degree of oral communication ability.

    But can we call ourselves eloquents? This point can be refuted in the offensive argument.

    2. Argument: There should be a criterion for judging which is more important. It is more advantageous to use impact as a criterion.

    From the perspective of social impact: the signing of official documents is more effective than verbal agreements, and the transmission of culture and education are more far-reaching. Self-influence:

    In the process of improving literary talents, we should strengthen our self-cultivation and improve our overall quality, so as to better meet the needs of society.

    3. Note: The interpretation of literary talent and eloquence in modern Chinese cannot be copied. It should be broadened to say that such as writing is the ability to write poetry, and talent refers to knowledge and application ability. Literary talent, then, refers to the knowledge of writing poetry and the ability to apply this knowledge.

    4. Remember to add more literary style when making arguments and arguments, which will add extra points. You will lose 50% of the proposition itself, so you have to break it back in form and language.

    5. Don't make the mistake of "If you don't have literary talent, how can you have eloquence."'Errors. This is a comparative question, and on the premise that both exist, the other party can immediately refute it as soon as it is mentioned.

    6 Think about the examples they may have, and break them one by one in advance if they can be broken, so it won't be too painful. They are likely to say Obama, recommend monks to buy combs, and so on. You can refute him from the side, and don't let the judges think that your answer is far-fetched.

    For example, Obama, you can say: Do you think that millions of people in the United States support Obama because of his eloquence? Is it true that any person with good communication skills can get the support of his people and sit on the **?

    Besides, this only proves that eloquence is important, but it does not mean that eloquence is more important than literary talent.

    The crystallization of our own painstaking thoughts has been dedicated, and we hope it will be useful.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Haha, I just debated it last week, and it was a wonderful win. But the manuscript is handwritten, hehe, so I don't have time to type it now, it's a bit long, so everyone cheered, it's very good to argue,

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Wencai was originally the brain.

    come, and eloquence is formed through the big self-brain

    Only then can there be eloquence, and a person wants du

    If you want to say it, and say it well, literary talent is a certain foundation, which means that there is no eloquence without literary talent, in contrast, of course, literary talent is more important than eloquence.

    In today's society, communication is used"Eloquence", but if you don't have literary talent, you can't say it if you want to say it, you can't say it, so you can talk about eloquence.

    It often happens that two people say the same thing, but the effect is completely different, and that's where Wencai comes in, isn't it?

    Therefore, it can be seen that literary talent is more important than eloquence, it is the basis of eloquence, it is the God of eloquence, and without literary talent, it is equivalent to being dumb and eating coptis, isn't it?

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    That's what your point is. Eloquence is more important than literary talent! Carnegie said

    It is a talent who does not necessarily have eloquence, and an eloquence is a talent! Now, even if you write the report perfectly, but you are too timid to express yourself well, so what is the use of the report you make?"Scholars are useless!

    It is useless to read the books of the sages and sages for the sake of reading!

    Xiucai can't explain why he meets Bing! "The stomach is full of ink, but the mouth can't speak, you can't learn to use it, the more you read the head, the better, but the mouth is stupid, you can't speak, the social rhythm is so fast, communication skills are very important, do you want me to say a word, you shake your head and write a sentence? I'm sorry, I don't have time, you have written, put the text in the front desk, I have time to read it again!

    We can't say that literary talent is not important, but eloquence should be ranked in front of literary talent, that is to say, eloquence is more important than literary talent!

    No matter how good your writing is, you are rich in learning, you have a doctorate in double languages, you have published works in internationally renowned journals, and you are nominated for the Nobel Prize, but when you face the examiner of the employer, you speak in a slurred manner, and the preface does not match the afterword, just ask, will the other party associate knowledge and literary talent with you? ? Probably not! Because your eloquence has made others question your literary talent!

    Then do you say that eloquence is more important than literary talent? People don't accept you, what is the use of you saying that you have no more literature?

    If you don't have much literary talent and read few books, but you are good at grasping the hearts of others, can treat people, and have first-class eloquence, then with your politeness and calm bearing, you will definitely stand out!

    Then you said, I'm not eloquent, I don't speak, I'm also polite, calm and calm, hehe, pretend to be deep! Don't open your mouth, just open your mouth and it will be filled!!

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    High score and low energy, boiling dumplings in a teapot can't be said, can write and can't say that it's no different from being dumb, now applying, the resume is two, the important thing is those simple conversations! Why do illiterate big bosses succeed? It is to be able to speak, to be able to capture the hearts of employees...Wait a minute.

Related questions
14 answers2024-06-29

A good example in my heart.

The ancients said: "See the virtuous and think about it".It is often said that "the power of example is endless".As a result, people admired celebrities, worshipped heroes, and pursued stars. Of course, I also have a good example to learn from in my heart. >>>More

5 answers2024-06-29

Interesting and in-depth debates include:Humans should not stop lookingOuter spaceLife. A good debater is not a good lover. >>>More

24 answers2024-06-29

Growth is continuous, and achievements are only a past tense, and we cannot use achievements to make any evaluation and reference for growth. Because growing up is a moment full of joy, frustration, excitement and so on that we will never forget, and the results are only success or failure, without the effort and sweat we put into it.

15 answers2024-06-29

1.Since the front and rear velocities are 0, v=at can be obtained. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-29

Hello, glad to answer for you. After giving birth to a second child, many female friends will choose to take care of the baby full-time at home after giving birth to a second child, and a few choose to continue to work after taking maternity leave. 1. Considerations for mothers who are full-time at home with their babies. >>>More