Novice photographer, is it better to buy a micro single or an entry level SLR?

Updated on number 2024-06-19
6 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    If you are a photography enthusiast or will make a living from photography, and are ready to invest a lot of money in photography in the next few decades (hundreds of thousands of dollars should always be wanted), then choose a DSLR, and do not choose an entry SLR, it should be slightly better and more functional.

    If you just want to understand the knowledge of SLR and preliminary photography, so that you can "burn the bag" when you are with others, it means that you are also a photography enthusiast, you can choose SLR, but it is best not to be a beginner, after all, if you meet a real expert, it is easy to know that a lot of equipment has not been used, and there is no actual experience, and many people who have not used knowledge and strategies do not know.

    If you just want to fool the layman, you can buy an entry-level SLR. But also be aware that laymen evaluate things as good or bad, so don't let them know.

    The direction of the development of digital cameras is very clear, that is, miniaturization, high image quality and ease of use, sacrificing the control that ordinary people do not need, in exchange for small size and good image quality, which is also the fundamental reason for the increasing popularity of mirrorless cameras, the camera market differentiation is more clear, professional cameras are based on functions, more expensive and produced for professionals, consumer cameras are more easy to use and the picture quality is constantly getting better, ** of course it will not be too expensive, like now with an entry-level SLR situation, maybe it will no longer appear.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    If you have money, you can buy the best you can accept, and you get what you pay for.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    If you want to learn photography or DSLR, let's do it.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    If you are buying a camera for home or photography hobbies, such as travel commemoration and recording life, then a mirrorless camera like Canon M5 and M6 is enough, with good direct effect, easy to carry and easy to operate. When you are familiar with some of the principles of photography, you can also fiddle with the SLR.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Mirrorless.

    First of all, I personally don't recommend choosing a DSLR for entry-level cameras. Because many people's first-class cameras are just to record daily life, shoot people, life, travel, still life and other subjects.

    The size of the SLR camera is too large, it is inconvenient to carry, the continuous shooting speed is not enough, and the performance is basically not good; The mirrorless camera is small in size and fast in continuous shooting, so I personally recommend the entry-level camera!

    In addition, when you make a budget, you must include the money for the lens, and you can't use the body alone.

    Advantages and disadvantages of mirrorless and DSLR:

    1) Lightness and portability in size.

    In everyone's cognition, mirrorless will be smaller than SLR, light weight and portability. This is overall, but in fact there are quite a few SLRs that are lightweight, and not all mirrorless mirrors are considered small.

    2) Professional performance.

    Mirrorless and SLR models range from home to professional, and they can meet the needs of different groups, that's for sure.

    In terms of shooting performance, there is no doubt about the professionalism of SLR and mirrorless, but mirrorless has one more strength, that is, the shooting function of **, which is generally stronger than SLR, which is a major advantage of mirrorless in professional performance.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It is not recommended to ** door machine, nor is it recommended to buy a DSLR.

    SLR is no longer the mainstream, mirrorless is the future.

    Nowadays, the camera function of mobile phones is very powerful, which is enough to cope with daily shooting records.

    Since I want to buy a camera, it should be a bit of a requirement for **, it is for photography enthusiasts, the entry machine obviously cannot meet the requirements, maybe you will feel that it is not enough to buy it not long ago, and you want to upgrade, so it will be repeated investment and spend money in vain.

    Therefore, it is recommended that you buy a full-frame mirrorless camera, which does not have to be the most **, of course, and at least one lens.

    You can buy a set of machines, such as Sony A7M3+24-105F4 sets.

Related questions
9 answers2024-06-19

The sleeve is generally a lens with relatively low image quality, what is the maximum aperture? Surely there is a constant aperture from time to time, right? >>>More

15 answers2024-06-19

If you want to pull the wind, it must be the SLR more wind, micro I always feel that it is a transitional product, I recommend you to the entry SLR of various brands! >>>More

12 answers2024-06-19

If you're not crazy about photography. Or on a whim.

In fact, it's good to buy a micro order... >>>More

5 answers2024-06-19

Inch refers to the size of the guitar, this is a novice doesn't matter, it has something to do with the size of the body, originally these two guitars are also about the same, because 1 inch = centimeter, two centimeters or so. However, the 41-inch resonant speaker is larger. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-19

I'm coming to you. From the perspective of mirrorless, I still recommend that you choose nex5, first of all, this camera is a masterpiece that makes the concept of mirrorless in one fell swoop, so the quality is ***, I started one in Hong Kong in August this year, and it feels good. Secondly, it's the camera, the imaging mainly looks at the lens, and Sony's machine with Zeiss head is very good. >>>More