Which Pro Evolution Soccer is the most fun? Trouble Peng Yuoh recommend one. I m tired of playing 8.

Updated on physical education 2024-06-15
24 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I've played each one of them in recent years and think Pro Evolution 2009 is the best, and here's my summary of each one and why Pro Evolution Soccer is fun. I believe that there should be a lot of fans who play live games, and some of them want to support their favorite teams like this while being entertained, isn't it true that it is getting more and more real? If you are real, it will be like watching a real game broadcast, and you can enjoy the game while being entertained.

    I believe that the live 8 classic is a classic, but only limited to it can be networked in Haofang. There is nothing good about the others. Let's not talk about live 9, no one plays it, I admit that it's very good, the graphics and so on are good, and it's real, but after all, it's an old engine, and a lot of immaturity For example, can it be judged to fake fall?

    There are also a lot of actions in it that reality can't do at all. Live 2008 was admittedly poor, and the company can't wait to come out in 2009, so I think 2009 is the best, perfectly completing the transition from the old engine to the new engine, and adding a new model, Shade Legend. Ultra-realistic graphics, near-real action It makes you feel like you're watching a live stream.

    And the players in him are very consistent with the current reality, which is more suitable for real fans. Soccer games are slow to show maturity because it is close to reality. Does anyone like to play that kind of football game, where the people walk like a fly, and there is no fun at all? Beg.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The feel of Live 10 is admired by many players, and the shooting feeling is also very cool.

    But if you think about it from the Master League alone, there is no doubt that 2008 is more realistic. Because of the addition of the prestige system. This means that your team is not prestigious enough to buy big-name stars, and there can be 20 teams in each league, which is more real than Live 10.

    And the computer is also better than Live 10, and can remember your attacking routines, which means that you can benefit from this long pass, and the computer will pay attention next time, and it is difficult for you to do a game without conceding a goal.

    That being said, the question you're asking isn't a matter of fish and bear's paws. You can try them all, and the one you choose is the most suitable for you, so why let others help you make a choice.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Live Eight is the most popular, though not very real.

    But everyone has played Live 8 probably pretty fast.

    There is a lot of use of personal technology.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I guess Live 10 is more realistic.

    And then PES2008 is also quite good.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    I just want to say that 2012 has become invincible in the computer, and everyone is like Messi, all of them are like Messi, and all kinds of difficult goals dazzle you. . .

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    2012 is more fun than 2011 Zhisai now has to find a good opportunity to pass it over, otherwise it will be easily broken.

    The graphics are much better than in 2011, the computer AI is not low at all, and it will cheat ......All sorts of outrageous long-range free kicks can be scored.

    However, it is normal for you to say that you can't hit the Chinese players in the individual confrontation Essien The most difficult 2012 computer player's body balance is 99 ...... by default

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Pro Evolution Soccer 2012 AI will be a little better than 2011. However, the relative difficulty of operation has increased a lot, and the 2-over-1 coordination requires the use of the right joystick. And the straight plug is weakened a lot, and often the desired effect is not available.

    And if you are outstanding, you can't rely on speed and strength alone, and you have to cooperate with a lot of gorgeous stunts. Mind it, your fingers will be busy.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I agree that upstairs is all Messi, and the training in the Master League is too painful

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Personally, I think PES2012 is a technology stream. Press the shot and acceleration button like in 2011, and it is impossible to break the ball directly.

    And it feels like the computer is always invincible, Cosmos.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    2012 is much more fun than 2011 Individual ability is not very obvious except for Messi Computer AI is relatively more reasonable 12 Physical confrontation is not as obvious as 11 Compared to speed and skill are important If the operation is good, there is no need to fight to pass the man Tactics and passing are also more reasonable than 11 Overall, it tends to be more realistic.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    2010 is more difficult to pass the ball and the like are more particular about the computer AI is also very high I haven't gotten started until 2009 in the fake shot is king.

    The harder it is to play, the more you want to play, and it has to do with the psychology of people.

    I think 2010 is difficult, but it's also fun.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    Whatever you like!! There was no computer control in 2009, and there was in 2010. In 2009, it was easy to buy and sell players, but in 2010, it was difficult, and each was good! Play as long as you like.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Let's put it this way, Live 8 is the 2005 version, and Live 9 10 is 2006, 2007. In 2007, after Live 10, Konami released Live 2007, and since then it has been naming live series directly with the year.

    In terms of playability and authenticity, Live 2009 is the best choice. As for transfer patches and whatever, there are various live thematic forums on the Internet.

    Live 2008 is too bad to talk about.

    In Live 2010, the graphics are much more realistic than the previous titles, and many new elements have been added to the Master League, including sponsors and so on. However, the playability of the game is not as strong as that of Live 2009, and the configuration requirements are also higher. Sinicization and player transfer patches also have to go to major forums**.

    However, if you didn't need a transfer patch to play Live 8 before, you won't need it for the next few games.

    Personal recommendation is Live 2009

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    If you want to say the version, it's 08.,But if you want to say that the game is gorgeous, it's 11.,But 11 still has a lot of egg pain.,It's hard to say.,It's also related to personal feelings.,I won't introduce them one by one.,But the 11 version has a lot of new skills.,Such as pressing can't turn.,Heel rainbow pick (this is a magic skill.,Super cool) and the "fake fall" that hurts people (I've only succeeded 2 times so far.,Generally yellow cards will be shown),Of course, the 11 version of the free kick is also very good.,Compared with the previous version, Free kicks are played in more ways and less difficult (getting over the wall is no longer difficult), and of course the 10 versions of the free kicks that passed through the wall were less successful in the 11 version. Of course, the most outstanding change is the appearance of the feint combination (a button can appear as a continuous combination of feints, oh, more gorgeous) to make the dribbling, passing more pleasing to the eye.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    Live 2009 is developed under the premise of live 9 o'clock, the picture is more realistic and smooth, live 2010 is also called PES2010For example, the task of Live 9 is very large, and it is very difficult to pass, everyone's speed is about the same, and the action is very rigid, and in Live 2010, the personal characteristics are brought into play, like Messi 9 is super fast, and the picture of playing football is more real and smooth. Pro Evolution Soccer 2010 is more fun than the previous ones, the picture quality inside is also better, and the green mode has been launched, you can operate a task to start playing from the lowest league, very fun.

    Live 2011 should be out in a few months, though, and I hope you have fun.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    I recommend Live 2010, which can be regarded as good at the moment in terms of quality! It's perfect too! The game is constantly updated!

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    I personally think Pro Evolution Soccer 2010 is very wrong, not only does it have the latest players after the transfer, but the players in the game look closer to the real thing, you can try it.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    In fact, from 2009 to later, the Chinese team was able to pass a bunch of people, and in 2010, the strong ability was more difficult, but there were too many fouls and they didn't blow.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    Live 10 is good.

    The requirements are much lower than 09 10.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Live 8 international version, the Chinese voice version explained by Wang Tao is good.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    Live 8 is an older version! And there are a lot of bugs, such as serving the ball can shoot the ball directly into it! But this situation requires a bit of technology!

    And in Live 8, Da Luo and Xiao Luo are real bugs, which are quite unsolvable! Personally, I recommend playing the new version, such as Live 10, where the game tends to be real, but unfortunately there are too many black whistles!! But it still doesn't affect you to play.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    Pro Evolution Soccer 8 has a Super League version, which is more fun.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    2014 is just a few more teams than in '13. Because I bought it too. So there's no difference. As long as you are familiar with the operation, any one is quite interesting.

    The interface of 2014 hurts, but the picture effect is good, the interface of 2014 is so ugly, 2013 is fun, 2014 changed companies, so this year for the first time, I am not optimistic, and 2015 should be much better, and in 2014, the characters did not do it carelessly, and the group liked it too much, and the 2014 computer IQ was a little higher. And the operation is a little more user-friendly. The most important thing is that 14 can control the goalkeeper.

    And you can also choose the goalkeeper position when you become famous with a goal. 2013 Fun !! Although 2014 can play goalkeepers like filial piety, that picture is too fucked up!!

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    FIFA is better than the finch which envy is better to play.

Related questions
5 answers2024-06-15

I don't know if you're asking about the control skills of playing with a controller on a computer or a keyboard? Please explain. If it's a controller, you don't need to explain too much, but if you're using a keyboard, I personally recommend setting up the control buttons this way. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-15

Battlefield 3 (not out, October 25), Battlefield: Rebel Company 2

11 answers2024-06-15

It's not objective... The stats of the live are always not very objective, even the latest version is lagging behind, and the football manager pays more attention to the development of players, so the future is more important than the present, and the two games are not comparable at all.

11 answers2024-06-15

Seahorse Prima, good choice. As the best-selling model of the H1-A sedan platform independently developed by Haima Motor, the new generation of Prema new model takes CROSS as the design idea, which not only takes into account the advantages of comfort, handling, economy and other aspects, but also integrates the advantages of MPV, SUV and other models, and makes a number of improvements and upgrades in configuration, safety, power, handling and other aspects, completely breaking through the limitations of traditional family cars in the space size, vehicle passability and full use of functions. The "full-size space, all-round driving, and all-field application" brought by "full staff, full space, all uses, all road conditions, and all A-class" fully meet the needs of different consumer groups for "one car with multiple functions". >>>More

13 answers2024-06-15

Meite 40. It's not cost-effective, but it's high-performance.