Now his nephew says he wants to inherit his field, do you think that makes sense?

The question you are talking about is that the nephew wants to inherit his sweetness, and it makes sense to ask if it makes sense, this should be determined according to the specific situation, such as if he has no son without you, then his nephew. Well, it's not the first heir, but it is decided according to his own wishes, for example, if he is willing to inherit this land to his nephew, then she is the one who says what she can say, or what creditor's rights he has, well, owes himself a lot of money, or uses this part of the thing to compensate, which is okay. Mainly according to the root of the matter or his own wishes, if he really has no children and no daughters is a five-guarantee household, a lonely old man, then Murakami can also take back his land.

This part of the land was recovered from the possession of the state.

It depends on whether the relationship is good or not, if the uncle and nephew usually have a very good relationship, take care of each other, and inherit the land, it doesn't matter, first of all, if there are no children, if there are children, then it's another matter, unless the children agree, then there is no problem.

Now his nephew says he wants to inherit his field, do you think that makes sense? Your nephew's life doesn't make sense. You have children, and it is impossible for your nephew to inherit your field.

Unless you don't have children. Your nephew is filial to you and good to you. Regardless of your old age.

It has to be that you are willing to give to your nephew. He can inherit your property.

If your nephew raises you, and you will be retired after a hundred years, the field will belong to your nephew. If you have no children and no daughters. It is the five guarantees that the land cannot be returned to the nephew: it must be handed over to the state to take it back.

If the man has no children and needs his nephew to provide for him in old age, then his land can be inherited by the nephew.

It should not be his nephew who inherited his field, and if there is no descendant to inherit it, it should be recovered by Murakami and redistributed.

Does he have no children of his own? If not, his nephew has no right to inherit, and now the responsibility of the countryside is unchanged for 30 years, if there is no one else, he can also plant it first, and the village can take it back when the next time the field is divided

If his nephew passes to him, he can inherit it, and if not, it will not work, and if there are no children, the inheritance will be taken back.

If he had no children, and had taken care of him, supported him, and done his best, he might have inherited.

Nephews have no right to inherit. Only their own children. Only parents and spouses have the right to inherit.

The heirs stipulated by the state are parents, wives and children in the order of first succession, and only when the above heirs are absent or the inheritance rights have been renounced can it be the turn of other heirs.

I don't think there is such a reason, and it is not his nephew's turn.

Generally, it is given to their children first, and if they don't have it, they can.

As long as the law allows, it is fine, otherwise you can go to the court to sue, and it is best to go through the legal process.

Does he have no children? If there are no children, the first-order heir will not be able to take the turn of a nephew.

There is no legal provision for nephews to directly inherit the uncle's estate.

According to Article 16 of the Inheritance Law, citizens may make a will to dispose of their personal property in accordance with the provisions of this Law, and may appoint an executor.

A citizen may make a will to designate personal property to be inherited by one or more of the legal heirs.

Citizens may make a will to donate their personal property to persons other than the state, the collective, or the legal heirs.

The nephew can inherit according to the will of the previous generation, including the decedent's testament, testament, etc.

If there is no will and bequest agreement, then it depends on the legal inheritance

Article 10 of the Inheritance Law stipulates that inheritance shall be carried out in the following order:

First order: spouse, children, parents.

Second order: siblings, grandparents, maternal grandparents.

The nephew is not among the legal heirs and therefore has no right to legal inheritance.

However, this does not apply to those who have made a will or bequest.