The company came out of the overlord clause and caused the store to lose money if it didn t go out,

Hello, usually according to the contract, if the contract is written like this, you can ask the other party for compensation, specifically like this, I hope to help you.

If the overlord clause in early July causes the store to lose money, you should be able to ask him for compensation, you can negotiate with them, and if his overlord clause does cause damage to you, you can also solve it through legal means.

It is definitely illegal and unreasonable for the company to be the overlord clause, and now that the store has suffered a loss, it must be able to go to the company for compensation.

If the enterprise has this phenomenon of overlord clauses, you can consult a lawyer in advance, and if you feel that it is unfavorable to you, you can refuse to sign a contract, and once you sign it, you can find that there is a coercive behavior, you can solve it through legal means.

If the company comes out of the overlord clause and the store can't redeem and loses money, can it ask him to pay compensation? This is a matter of reconciliation between the two parties, and you can't blame the overlord clause from the company, because your own business is not good, this situation will also occur.

It should depend on whether there are provisions in the terms of the contract, and act according to the contract.

Your question is to ask the company to come out of the overlord clause and cause the store to lose money, can it also ask him to compensate? In this case, you can call 12315 to file a complaint. ：：

The company came out of the overlord clause, and the rice store couldn't redeem it and lose money, so I think he should have a form of compensation.

This page comes out of the overlord clause, resulting in the store can not go out of the loss of money, you should ask him for compensation, if the compensation is not enough, you can call the police.

There is never an absolute answer until the case is decided.

If you want to sue, there are a few reasons to consider:

1. The shopping mall has no right to impose a fine on you, the contract can stipulate liquidated damages, but there is no right to impose a fine between equal civil subjects, you must claim that when the contract was concluded, it was understood that the article was a fine in the normal sense (the nature of the fine imposed by the administrative authority), not liquidated damages, and you only understood that the shopping mall had no right to impose a fine on you after consulting now, so you did not agree to the clause, the shopping mall was a party that made the standard terms (I estimate that the contract between you is the same for all merchants), When the two parties have two or more interpretations of the standard clauses, the contractual interpretation shall be unfavorable to the party making the standard clauses.

2. If the above clause is recognized by the court as liquidated damages of the contract, you must not be verbally abused or beaten with the mall staff, otherwise it will be regarded as a breach of contract, which is also a big problem, first of all, you must be sure that you have not abused and beaten the mall staff, who claims that you have this behavior, he must provide evidence, if the matter is indeed known to everyone, you must firmly believe that you are the injured party, is the party who was abused and beaten, so this clause is invalid for you.

The contract between you should be executed first, and if there is no particular inappropriateness, it should not be considered an overlord clause.

As can be seen from the description, the penalty is an agreed liquidated damages. If you break the contract, you can be asked to pay.

The expression of the penalty seems to be wrong, there is no provision for penalty in China's contract law, and according to the content of this contract, the penalty should refer to liquidated damages. According to your contract, a conflict with a staff member is also one of the breach of contract clauses, and you, as the counterparty to the contract, are indeed liable for breach of contract.

Once you sign the contract, you can't do it. Black and white! to bear legal responsibility.