If there is a conflict between the doctoral supervisor and the student, who should mediate?

When pursuing a doctoral career, it is not only important that the student can complete his studies well and work hard to conduct research, but also that the supervisor he follows can train and guide his classmates attentively. However, sometimes there will be certain problems between the doctoral student and his supervisor, and at this time, one of the two sides needs to coordinate to a certain extent, and as for which party can take this step first, it should also be discussed on a case-by-case basis. <>

If the teacher has certain problems when supervising the doctorate, it is because the doctor himself is not able to study well, or he cannot understand the supervisor's wishes, and the supervisor is very impatient and delays time after coming down many times. Then doctoral students should first consider whether they have certain problems, and then carefully accept the guidance and opinions of teachers, so that they can really learn knowledge in the past few years of doctoral career, and can apply it to their future work and ability. After realizing your mistakes, you should also apologize to your tutor seriously, and then show your attitude and continue to improve yourself in your future studies.

If the tutor has certain problems and is not able to listen to the opinions of the students, even if he has certain mistakes, he cannot improve them well after learning about his own problems, and even his own staggered peaks and aspects are not consistent with the students, resulting in the students not gaining in the whole learning process. Then the state also clearly stipulates that if there is a certain problem between the two or if the supervisor has certain circumstances, then the student can provide a certain application and explanation, ask the school to terminate the relationship with the supervisor, and then re-solicit and determine the supervisor according to their own research direction and needs. <>

In any case, after entering the field of doctoral studies, students should understand that they are engaged in in-depth research related to envy, and the reason for continuing their studies is to make them interested in and improve their abilities. Therefore, they should also pay attention to whether they can get along with their supervisors, and do not make both parties feel inappropriate or have certain dissatisfaction, only when the two complement each other can they make their doctoral studies truly meaningful.

I think that first of all, this matter should be coordinated by the two of them, if it can't be solved, the relevant teachers can come forward to coordinate, they are all knowledgeable, capable people believe that they can take a step back and open the sky.

I think it's up to the school to regulate. Doctoral supervisors and students are adults. Able to control their emotions and look at problems rationally. If there is a conflict, it means that it is difficult for individuals to reconcile.

I think that after all, the problem lies between the tutor and the student, and it is best if the two of them try to communicate with each other first to find out the source and cause of the conflict, and it is best if it can be solved through communication. If you really can't solve it, you can ask a colleague from another tutor to mediate the conflict.

Then it is up to the principal to mediate, and the principal has the right to mediate the relationship between students and teachers, and the principal is also the direct leader.

The school leaders mediate, and the conflicts between the doctoral supervisors and the students can only be settled by the principal to mediate.

It should be mediated by the school, as the school has this responsibility and needs to change the tutor of the student if necessary.

On September 28, 2020, the Ministry of Education issued the "Several Opinions on Strengthening the Management of Doctoral Supervisors" (hereinafter referred to as the "Opinions").

The Opinions make it clear that doctoral supervisors are positions established for the training needs of doctoral students, and are not a fixed level or honorary title in the professional title system. The primary task of doctoral supervisors is to cultivate talents, and they are responsible for ideological and political education, academic standard training, and innovation ability training for doctoral students, and they must strictly abide by the code of conduct for the guidance of graduate supervisors.

The "Opinions" put forward that the training unit should clarify the procedures for changing tutors and establish dynamic and flexible adjustment methods. Graduate students and supervisors can apply for changing supervisors due to doctoral students' transfer of majors, change of research direction, or health reasons or transfer of supervisors. In the event of a conflict between teachers and students or other circumstances that are not conducive to maintaining a good mentoring relationship, the training unit shall promptly mediate in accordance with the principle of protecting the rights and interests of both teachers and students, and if necessary, may terminate the mentoring relationship and re-determine the mentor.

3. Most of the time, if there is indeed a conflict with the tutor and you want to change the tutor, this possibility is very small, so you should take the initiative to obey the tutor's will and complete your studies quickly. In fact, I have to say that if there is indeed a contradiction between myself and my tutor, then it is almost rare to change my tutor at this time, and it is precisely because of this that we should take the initiative to obey our tutor's will in some aspects to quickly complete our studies, and when necessary, we can also properly "monitor" our tutor through legal channels to maintain our core rights and interests.

In fact, for us, it does not mean that the contradiction between doctoral students and supervisors has also become the focus of social contradictions, so it should be paid more attention to by the society, and at present, we should use a more sensible method to effectively negotiate the contradictions between doctoral students and supervisors, so as to form a good academic circle.

If there is a conflict between the doctoral student and the supervisor and you want to change the supervisor, then you need to write an application for changing the supervisor, because generally a doctor's supervisor will always be only one person, so if you really want to change, you must apply.

Students can ask other doctoral supervisors if they can join their team, and after the supervisor agrees, they can apply to the school to change the supervisor.

According to Document No. 11 [2020] of the Ministry of Education, doctoral students can apply for a change of supervisor.

If this situation occurs, when there is a conflict between the doctoral student and the supervisor and wants to change the supervisor, if you really feel that it affects you, it is recommended to go to the school leaders to negotiate to change the supervisor.

You can ask your mentor to terminate the mentoring relationship, and you need to find another mentor who is willing to accept you as soon as possible. In this way, you will not delay your research progress and learning process.

If there is a conflict between the doctoral student and the supervisor and wants to change, the university needs to mediate, and if the mediation fails, the university will come forward to replace the supervisor.

"Several Opinions on Strengthening the Management of Doctoral Supervisors" According to the "Several Opinions on Strengthening the Management of Doctoral Supervisors", graduate students and supervisors can apply for changing their supervisors due to doctoral students' transfer of schools, majors, changes of research directions, or health reasons or transfer of supervisors. At the same time, the tutor change system has been improved. The training unit should clarify the procedures for changing the tutor and establish a dynamic and flexible adjustment method.

This is more troublesome, the school doesn't want to offend the teacher because of this matter, and the tutor you want to change may also be out of the way and don't want to take you with you. So try to avoid this kind of thing, it's quite troublesome to deal with, but studies still come first.

This should be done in accordance with the relevant regulations and procedures. Different schools and education authorities should have relevant regulations.

<> it depends on the specifics and compliance between you and the tutor. However, here are some considerations:

If you have performed certain tasks or provided services, you are entitled to receive remuneration accordingly. Make sure that the amount you receive matches the work you do and that the transaction is transparent.

If you receive a payment that seems improper or inappropriate, please carefully consider your next steps. If you believe this is unethical, you can refuse to accept the payment and report it to the relevant authorities.

Finally, ensure compliance with any applicable tax regulations and legal requirements, and consult with a professional if necessary.

In short, you need to carefully consider your situation and compliance, and make a decision based on the actual situation.

Learning to communicate with teachers is also a science.

1.Interpersonal interactions require the art of communication and sometimes strategy.

The basic guideline is common sense. Rely on the foundation laid early in the family education. Usually the descendants of large families have an advantage in this regard.

2.The interaction between the student and the tutor needs to be sincere. There is absolutely no need for a strategy.

To know is to know, and not to know is not to know. The fundamental criterion for talking about problems is science and common sense. There will not be much ambiguity between teachers and students who have gone all the way through the systematic course training.

Those that string runways will be more ambiguous.

3.As a person, a student, or a tutor, if you are not a well-trained professional in a certain subject area, you are likely to have ambiguities in science based on a simple understanding, and in addition to the lack of interpersonal communication skills, you may become social from science, with constant problems, entanglement, and difficulty in extricating yourself.

What to do? Generally speaking, tutors will not change easily, because they have a non-scientific pressure framework such as set tasks, schedules, goals, budgets, etc. (except for those who are instigated by students to play with sky-high funds); Therefore, only the student has changed, of course, if you think that the tutor cannot guide you, don't apply for the exam? Since you applied for the exam, it means that you agreed with this tutor at the beginning, and later disagreed, which may mean that you are too far away from their field, and you yourself did not do your homework in the first place. When there is a conflict and it is irreconcilable, the best way is to either give up or change tutors or drop out and start over.

Under the Chinese system, exams, exams, exams. It is indeed inevitable that this kind of mistaken situation will occur. In the long run, it is necessary to integrate the recruitment method with international practices in order to achieve success once and for all.

The tutor is responsible for not completing the school, and the student is an adult, so he is also responsible. If a tutor often has the problem that students can't graduate, it's the tutor's problem.

For the sake of your own future, think more about what you don't do well? It's the mentor who gets angry, find your own reasons, try to change yourself, this is the fastest way to solve the problem, of course, you can also insist on yourself and try to change others, so much more difficult, you choose yourself.

1. Communicate with the teacher through parents or relatives, and strive to take the initiative to resolve the misunderstanding between you and the teacher, so that the teacher can understand;

2. Take the initiative to admit your mistakes to the teacher, ask the teacher to understand and forgive your youthful ignorance and some inappropriate behaviors, and you must be sincere when admitting your mistakes, and show your confidence and determination to correct; At the same time, it is also necessary to have full trust in the teacher, in fact, the teacher wants his students to be good, there is no doubt about this.

3. You should pay attention to your words and deeds, study hard in school, be a good student with excellent character and learning, show yourself with good conduct and behavior, pay attention to strengthening communication with teachers, gradually improve the relationship with teachers, and gradually establish a good impression in the minds of teachers.

Contradictions can be resolved in various ways, and doctoral supervisors should start from the overall situation of national science and technology, and have the responsibility to lead students well, hope that teachers and students have deep feelings, and jointly contribute to the country.

Such a teacher is really narrow-minded. You have to find a leader to give. Mentor. First pass thoughts.

Do what you like, and go to school for so many years!

If you don't believe it, you can't solve it!

Attack on the problems and human weaknesses and solve the contradictions!

Sometimes, think differently! Workaround:

It's different!! That's all I can write about!

You can change students or tutors.

I don't think it's the doctor's fault, because in the process of academic research, everyone has their own ideas, which is very normal, because after decades of education, it is very normal to have their own ideas, and if there is no own idea, then it is a very unfavorable thing in the future development.

First, theory is still very crucial

It is normal for there to be differences in the relationship between oneself and one's supervisor, but under the premise of differences, it is necessary to adhere to the correct theoretical theory that is the most basic support for every research achievement. In fact, theoretical knowledge is very important for the development of science today, and if there is no theory, then the future development will definitely be affected. <>

Second, you can have your own ideas

In fact, the education we have received from childhood to adulthood is the same, the teacher makes us obedient, and the parents of the students also make the students obedient, in this case, there is no idea, so in the process of university and even in the process of going to the doctorate, it is best to have your own ideas to be able to get better growth. <>

3. You can discuss with your mentor

I think the best way to learn is brainstorming, I am very optimistic about this method, in the process of deviation between my own ideas and the ideas of my mentor, in fact, we should have better communication, in the process of communication can share each other's results, and can better understand different knowledge. <>

I think that in the process of doing academics, if you don't have your own ideas, it's a sad thing, because in this society, only imagination can get a good development for academics, only those who have their own ideas can be different from their own mentor's ideas, and their mentor's ideas may not be correct, if you have your own set of theories, if you prove them in practice, it is also a very good learning method.