How should master s and doctoral students choose their supervisors?

Learn more about the mentor. On the one hand, it is the research direction of the supervisor, and on the other hand, it is the reputation of the supervisor. These two points are very important, what is the research direction of the tutor that you want to learn, then it is good to say, if it is not your favorite, it will be more troublesome.

The other is the reputation of the tutor, and it is true that in the tutor team, there are individual tutors who do things and behave relatively well, either blindly squeezing the students, or ignoring the students at all. These two points need to be understood in detail.

Some choose a tutor to look at academic things, such as the invention and creation proposed by the first publication, etc., some choose a tutor to see whether the tutor is a famous professor, and some choose a tutor to see whether the tutor has practical skills in his hands. However, the vast majority of graduate candidates, starting from pragmatism, consider whether the supervisor guides the students carefully and responsibly, and these candidates are most concerned about whether they can graduate on time. Others are not considered as priorities.

How to choose, in fact, is how to understand the information you want to know, so as to help you decide, that is, which school to go to which major and discipline enrollment direction.

Don't care too much about the name of the boss, if you study for a master's degree, you can't rely on the boss in a slightly better school, because many bosses will only treat the doctor as their own, and the master's degree is just cheap labor. Therefore, you have to consider how to graduate well, how to learn things well, and how to get a good job. Don't always think about what the big boss can help you, don't worry, they can't help you with anything, they will only card you when you graduate, don't let you go when you want to intern, and make a stumbling block when you are employed, you can't help him anyway On the contrary, there are many small bosses, very honest, teaching students very hard, if you don't have the ability, you don't have the ability, anyway, you still have to rely on yourself for employment.

The tutor's character is really important, no matter how beautiful his resume is, if he loses the bottom line of being a man, it is worthless, in fact, you don't know that many teachers' works ** are written by graduate students, and the last tutor's authors, and the names of those graduate students who do not have weekends will only appear in the acknowledgments, and collectively referred to as graduate students! I'm sure many people have a deep understanding, let me see your hands in agreement!

From a cute perspective, I think choosing a mentor is like choosing a boyfriend, the "academic level" of the mentor is equivalent to the appearance of a boy, but in fact, the most important thing to pay attention to is character. Someone asked why there are quotation marks here, because the academic level I am referring to here is not the real academic level, but the resume of the tutor you collected on the Internet, isn't this the same as looking at people, ** will be good-looking, and the resume will be written perfectly, but what kind of person is you have to look everywhere. Of course, academic quality is certainly important, but the most important thing I want to emphasize is character.

Nowadays, colleges and universities are generally responsible for the tutor group, and the tutor is not filled in when applying for the exam. Generally, the ** of the college will have a detailed profile and research direction of the supervisor. Then choose according to your future research direction and the direction of your mentor.

In the early stage, you can recommend your resume and future scientific research ideas and ideas to your intended supervisor in the form of email, which can increase your chances of being selected.

On the one hand, you can go to the school's official website to check the information of the tutor, of course, this is only the most popular way. My personal suggestion is to try to find some senior brothers and sisters in our school, who are more familiar with this aspect and understand it more thoroughly. If you really can't do it, it's okay to find some students from our school to find out.

All in all, just try to find out in every way.

Most candidates send messages to the candidate tutors in advance through the Internet QQ or WeChat or email to understand the situation. Generally, they contact multiple supervisors at the same time, and through understanding and introducing their own situation, they generally know the specific situation of the candidate supervisor's graduate student recruitment, graduation, postponement and withdrawal, etc., and also understand the content direction and future trend of the research topic to some extent. Through online communication, it can also be roughly seen whether the tutor is responsible for the students or whether they are strict.

Thus contributing to their own final choice.

Be well prepared before contacting a teacher. You can read the teacher's personal ** or recently published**, learn more about the teacher's research field, choose the teacher you are interested in, take the initiative to express your interest in his research work to the teacher, and further understand the purpose of the teacher's research and the research funds he has.

Inquire about the reputation of a good teacher, don't learn from other people's mouths, it must be from his students. When studying for a master's degree or a doctorate, the environment is relatively closed, and no one in a laboratory may know about other people's supervisors, let alone students in other laboratories. To get to know a boss, you have to ask his students.

You have to be clear about what kind of mentor you choose, don't always think about finding a mentor quickly, but you don't know what kind of mentor you want, and blindly start to choose, which is a big taboo.

After passing the preliminary examination and entering the re-examination, it is best to visit the laboratory of the candidate supervisor and chat with the graduate students who are working and studying in the laboratory. You can even communicate with graduate students to know the character and academic situation of the candidate supervisor. These circumstances are the best information for finalizing the mentor.

You need to know yourself first. For example, your work values, work habits, and what you want to achieve during the learning phase. After that, start to choose a mentor who is a good match for you in all aspects.

You can start by contacting different teachers in a variety of ways, such as during classes, at meetings, or through introductions.

Choose the one with money, what research you do without money, research is to burn money, a similar biological laboratory, how to do it cost about 10,000 a day. Liberal arts don't understand.

Don't choose a young associate professor, you're going to have a hard time, it's better to choose a younger professor, or a teacher with a Buddha nature. And those teachers who are full of enthusiasm and chasing fame and fortune are better not to choose.

Although I am not a graduate student, I think that the choice of a supervisor should be based on how much the students he supervised have achieved during their studies.

Theoretically speaking, a doctoral supervisor can take Ph.D., master's, and Shijian students; In fact, when a teacher reaches a certain age, he first starts to teach undergraduates, then masters, and finally doctors.

Ph.D. supervisors can take Ph.D. and master's degrees at the same time. In this way, there is a problem, people's energy is limited, and doctoral supervisors will focus on the allocation of energy for doctoral and master's teaching. Old professors generally focus on doctoral training, but it is not excluded that young doctoral supervisors will focus on master's training.

Doctoral Supervisor:

It is a teaching and scientific research personnel with deep academic attainments in this discipline, and its academic level is in the forefront of the domestic discipline, close to or reaching the international advanced level in some aspects, generally with the title of professor, and there are also particularly excellent associate professors and lecturers as doctoral supervisors.

He has experience in training graduate students, and has trained at least two master's students.

Able to work normally and take on the responsibility of practical supervision of doctoral students. There is an academic team that assists me in supervising doctoral students, and the quality of graduate students trained is good. Undergraduate or master's students who have taught courses and have undertaken or are undertaking a certain amount of work. Return shirt.

Young professors (who graduated from universities after 1972) apply to be doctoral supervisors, in addition to the above conditions, they should generally have a doctoral degree. Degree that has trained at least one master's degree or assisted in supervising doctoral students at home and abroad**.

Generally speaking, a doctoral supervisor can lead a master's student at the same time. In Chinese universities, most doctoral supervisors will also guide master's students when they are stupid, so as to give better play to the teaching and scientific research ability of the supervisor and improve the comprehensive quality and scientific research level of the graduate students. However, when supervisors lead master's and doctoral students, they need to consider the different characteristics and needs of the students, and give different guidance and support.

At the same time, supervisors need to ensure their own workload and quality, and ensure that they can provide sufficient time and resources for each graduate student.

<> there is no definitive answer to this question as every student's situation is different. Here are some factors to consider:1

Research Interests: Is your research direction aligned with a professor's expertise? If yes, then the professor is probably good, regardless of whether he is a doctoral supervisor or a master's supervisor.

2.Degree type: If you want to get a Ph.D., then it may be better to find a doctoral supervisor, because he usually has more research experience and in-depth theoretical knowledge.

If you only want to get a master's degree, then a master's supervisor may be a better fit for you, as they are usually more focused on teaching and practice. 3.Learning Style:

Different professors have different learning styles. Some professors prefer to give students a high degree of freedom, while others may place more emphasis on student discipline. You need to choose a professor who teaches in a way that matches your study habits and preferences.

On the other hand, a master's supervisor may pay more attention to your performance in teaching and coursework and provide you with more guidance. To sum up, you need to consider a variety of factors to choose whether a PhD supervisor or Zheng Kong is a master supervisor, and the best way is to communicate with potential people and ask them some questions about style, research direction, and other aspects to make a decision that is suitable for the family.

You can bring it. Doctoral supervisors should be teaching and research personnel with deep academic attainments in the discipline, whose academic level is in the forefront of the domestic discipline, close to or reaching the international advanced level in some aspects, generally with the title of professor, and there are also particularly excellent associate professors and lecturers as doctoral supervisors. He has experience in training graduate students, and has trained at least two master's students.

The main work of the doctoral supervisor is to learn according to the doctoral student. The main job of a doctoral supervisor is not to prescribe a few courses for students, but to guide students to learn.

In other words, the main job of a mentor is not to teach, but to guide.

If you don't have a good advisor during your Ph.D. studies, you should report the situation to the school. We should pay close attention to determining the direction of our own development, accumulate knowledge around this general direction, and make more accumulation during the first year of research. With enough accumulation, you can find your own innovation.

Try to be consistent with your mentor in the choice of the main direction of attack. If it's really hard to convince yourself, you can choose your own direction.

1.Choosing a mentor is really important, and I hope everyone takes this matter seriously and doesn't take it too casually. A tutor with personality problems will affect the smooth graduation of students.

Be sure to wait for the school to assign you as soon as possible, otherwise you will be passive. Generally, the tutor will consult your personal interests and practical level according to the direction you are engaged in, and some more humanized tutors may also formulate a training plan, so that senior doctors or master's seniors can usually guide the students' practical work, hold regular group meetings, and listen to the students' reports in the group meetings.

2.Many students who extend their studies are often unable to carry out scientific research and practice activities in time due to the inconsistency of their main direction with their supervisors, delaying innovation. Communicate with your mentor and they will usually provide some resources.

Try to get into the core group and have a more direct impact on subsequent learning and research. Even if you don't have a direction you're interested in, go to the Caucus first. Interest itself can be cultivated, but learning and research experience are more important.

3.If you don't agree with your supervisor's research direction, the supervisor will focus on students who are in the same direction as him or in his area of expertise. It's not about personality, it's about learning or getting more advice.

So if he chooses to pay attention to you, he will become stern because he cares too much. After all, the number of students a tutor can lead is limited, and this one has to compete. Teaching takes a long time, and they all want their proud students to make a difference.

The above is the answer to the question of what to do when you don't have a good mentor during your Ph.D. study.

First of all, you should make a suitable plan by yourself, and you should have an independent ability to treat everything, rather than relying on the mentor's supervision of you, but work hard to improve your skills, so as to increase your experience.

At this time, we should persevere, because it is not easy to change the tutor, and basically it is impossible to change the tutor, so when we encounter this situation, we must persevere.

When you are studying for a PhD, your own ability is more important, and the teacher is just an assistant, and you need to improve your hands-on ability and think for yourself.

When studying for a Ph.D., the first thing is that one's own strength is important, and the teacher is only an assistant, and it is necessary to draw on one's own steps and think for oneself.