Ask a hypothetical question

I've seen Conan's say Actually, I really want Conan and Xiao Ai to be together, but I can't help it, Uncle Aoyama doesn't think so, so I make Conan love Xiaolan deeply....So in this case, don't let it out, because love is not charity, and Xiao Mourn will not get real happiness because of Xiao Lan's withdrawal, and Xiao Mourn's happiness lies in the process of paying for Conan....And Conan's happiness lies in staying with Xiaolan for a long time....

1.If you were that poor girl, would you break them up because you had managed to find someone to rely on? (If you were a little mourner, would you break them up).

First of all, what good will it do me to mourn by breaking them apart? If Shinichi really likes to mourn, does it still need to be broken up? Even if it's dismantled, will Shinichi prefer this kind of mourning?

Secondly, if I were mourning, I wouldn't break up Xinlan, it's not easy to find a support, but if I want to break them up and make two people sad, I won't necessarily be much happier, perhaps, I will lose more.

2.If you were the man, would you take pity on the woman and leave her? (If you were the new one, would you leave Lan because of mourning?)

I won't, I'll want the person I like to be happy, and if I'm Shinichi, I'll consider Ran's happiness first.

Besides, if you leave Lan, you won't be happy. Not to mention. Lan had been so persistently waiting for Shinichi to come back, how could I leave.

3。Finally, if you were Maoliran, would you give Shinichi to Xiao Ai?

Although I like Shinichi, I don't have the right to help Shinichi make a choice.

It's not a question of whether I let it or not, it's a question of who Shinichi chooses. Shinichi has his own choice, and what I want to do is respect Shinichi's choice.

It's really hard to choose!!

The focus is on Shinichi's choice.

You know? Shinichi likes Lan very much, Lan also likes Shinichi very much, they have confessed to each other, so ah, Shinichi and Lan love each other, how could Shinichi be with her because of pity? Shinichi is so smart, sympathetic and loving that he won't think?

Moreover, a girl as good as Wai should have the one who belongs to her, if Shinichi is really with Wai, then such a Shinichi is not worthy of Ai and Lan's liking.

It's just that I think mourning sauce is more suitable for the new one.,Lan sauce can't help but be a little sluggish.,It's not as wise as mourning.。。。 And Shinichi is a detective.,He's always suspected.,Xiao Ai's ability to face danger is definitely stronger than Lan's.,It won't be a burden to Shinichi.,And sometimes you can help Shinichi.。 I think I like Ke Ai because I like Xiao Ai.

About if you were a little mourning, would you break them up?

Obviously, Shinichi likes Ran now.

Then definitely not (assuming Xiao Ai likes Shinichi).

The person you like like like that won't be happy.

If you were the man, would you take pity on the woman and leave her?

I don't think there are real feelings.

No. A love that is sustained by pity.

It won't last long.

The relationship should be mutually pleasing, if the person you like also likes her, then it's a different matter!

In fact, it is not as cost-effective to make one person happy as it is to make two people happy.

Because I think that the woman's pity and the man's love is similar to charity.

Isn't that poor woman even more sad?

Don't force it.

If it were me, I would choose to mourn, but Shinichi, I still want him to be with Ran, like you said, as long as there is peace.

Love is love, friendship is friendship, and I think it's better not to confuse the two.

If I were this girl, I would play fair with her, men are not clothes, and they can't just let them go.

If it's done because of mercy, then in the end it's just going to hurt all three people, isn't it?

No, never, not if you really like him.

Stick to Day 267 Read "Focus on Solving Short Courses**" to p97 20220311

Suppose the question is a method of asking questions that jumps from the present to the vision of the future, and assumes that the difficulties we encounter have been solved, what will happen to the situation, so as to trigger the person to find the goal and describe the goal, so as to explore the technology of the solution.

Suppose the question has two functions:

1.It is used to help clients find positive, positive goals.

What would have happened if the problem had not existed? ”

2.Describe the signs of success, describe the details of the vision, and explore ways to solve them.

If tomorrow your goal is achieved, what will we see happening? ”

Reduced to one sentence:

If... Tomorrow you will ...

Hypothetical question does:

Hypothetical questions that skip the question to find the target:

Imagine that after three months (six months) your problem is solved, you meet me again, and you will tell me what happened? ”

If you don't need my help anymore, what do you think is because of what happened? ”

How can you know when the problem has been solved? ”

If I'm the clock on the wall in your house and your house has changed, I'll see what you're doing to disturb them? ”

Hypothetical questions describing the goal:

One day you have achieved your goals and fulfilled your heart's desire, how do you think life will be different? ”

When things change, what's the first sign you'll notice? ”

If you start moving towards a solution, what will be the signs in your life? ”

Who would be most surprised by this change in you? Who is least surprised? What would he say? ”

All in all, assuming that the architecture contains a positive meaning, just like mountaineering, if you look at the peak from the foot of the mountain, some people will have negative thoughts in their hearts: "How tiring are so many steps!" Or maybe you're already discouraged before you go:

When will we be able to get to such a long way! It may even be possible to give up the thought: "It's simply not possible!"

Assuming that the architecture can help the client imagine that he has reached the top, it will not only give him hope of realizing his vision, but also give him a sense of accomplishment "when he looks back", and he will also look at the hardships he has paid for it. Therefore, after sharing the pleasant experience of "standing on the top of a mountain" with the visitor using a hypothetical framework, and then discussing with them the specific methods and steps to achieve the goal, the visitor will actively plan and quickly find a way to achieve the goal.

Four, Four, Four, Four, Hypothesis, Hypothesis, Hypothesis, Hypothesis Engels once pointed out: "As long as natural science is thinking, its form of development is hypothesis."

Many influential scientific theories in the history of science, such as Mendeleev's periodic table and Copernicus's heliocentric theory, first appeared in the form of hypotheses. In solving mathematical problems, assuming that the unknown number is x, and listing equations to solve the problem, is based on the idea of hypothesis. Because of the assumptions, the unknown can be regarded as known, and complex quantitative relationships can be simplified.

The problem of "chickens and rabbits in the same cage" in ancient arithmetic in China was solved by the hypothetical method, which often assumed the existence of a certain phenomenon first, obtained a "difference" that was different from the known conditions, and then analyzed the cause of the "difference" and made appropriate exchanges to solve the problem. Example 1 There are 100 heads and 350 legs in the cage. (1990 Jinan Lixia District Primary School Mathematics Fifth Grade Competition Questions) Analysis:

Suppose 100 are all rabbits, then there should be 4 100=400 feet, 400-350=50 feet more than the actual one, if you replace a rabbit with a chicken, then you can reduce 4-2=2 feet, to reduce 50 feet 2=25 chickens, so you can find the number of chickens. Solution 1: (4 100-350) (4-2)=25 (head) chickens, 100-25=75 (heads) rabbits.

or (350-2 100) (4-2)=75 (head) rabbits, 100-75=25 (head) chickens. Solution 2: Set:

Chickens have x heads, then rabbits have (100-x) heads. 2x+4 (100-x)=350, the solution is x=25. 100-25 = 75 (head) rabbits.

A: There are 25 chickens and 75 rabbits.

Question 1: Rabbit 18 Chicken 14

Column equation: rabbit x chicken y.

4x+2y=100

2x+4y=92

Then solve it.

The second question of the big monk is total: 1 25 = 25 (pieces) The third question of the little monk 75 is set to have x sheets of one corner and y sheets of 2 corners, then x+y=17 x+2y=25 is solved to obtain x=9, y=8

The small monks have a total of: 3 25 = 75 (pcs.

Question 4 can be understood like this:

If all 6 pits are dug, (6-4) 2 = 4 pits will be dug more.

If all 5 pits are dug, 3 fewer pits will be dug (5 pits per person, and 3 more pits will be dug).

Then the number of people digging (4+3) (6-1)=7 (people) can be found to be the number of tree pits is 5 7+3=38

The fifth question is set to 10 yuan with x sheets, then 2 yuan and 5 yuan have sheets, you can get:

10x＋〈2＋5〉×〈25－

x 10 A: 10 RMB 10 sheets.

Eldest brother.. It's not easy. Give it points.

From 7 o'clock to 12 o'clock, except for the top of the mountain to play for one hour, it is 4 small hours to tell Kai and time.

That is, up the mountain, down the mountain for a total of 4 hours, a total of 11 kilometers, as a chicken and rabbit cage.

Assuming that all the mountains are up, Sun Kong's 8 kilometers in 4 hours will be more than the upper mountain.

11-2 4) 3=1 (hour).

1 hour descent, 5 km; Go to the mountain for 3 hours and walk 6 kilometers.

Solution: Except for one hour of playing, a total of walking: 12-7-1=4h per hour when going down the mountain: 2+3=5km

Assuming that the whole process is a trembling meditation downhill speed walking, you need to walk 5 4 = 20 km more than the hole: 20-11 = 9 km

So walked up the hill: 9 3 = 3h

So walking up the hill: 2 3 = 6km

So walk downhill: 11-6 = 5km

The average daily wholesale pork is beef.

600 250 times).

The rest of the pork is beef kernel.

3 This talks about potato times).

It turns out that beef has.

750 kg).

It turns out that there is a pork forest.

1250 3 3750 (kg).