If the elderly suddenly die while taking a bath, is the bathhouse operator responsible?

One. Actually, for this matter, if the elderly die suddenly while taking a bath, is the bathhouse operator responsible? I don't think it should be used, because the old man died suddenly when he took a bath in the morning, not because of the bathhouse, and legally speaking, the bathhouse operator is not responsible, and in every aspect, the bathhouse operator is not responsible.

Two. However, the bathhouse operator may compensate the family of the elderly out of humanitarian responsibility, but this is not a necessary thing, so the family of the elderly should not be able to ask the bathhouse operator to compensate, because the responsibility does not lie with the bathhouse operator at all, and it is the problem of the old man himself that will cause the sudden death, so they have no reason to ask the bathhouse operator to compensate at all. <>

Three. Therefore, the bathhouse operator is not responsible at all, so no one can ask the bathhouse operator to compensate the old man's family, because legally speaking, the bathhouse operator does not have any illegal acts, so the morning operator does not have to compensate the old man, and no one can ask him, because this is an unreasonable demand, it is better not to make this kind of demand, because this unreasonable demand, the bathhouse operator can even reject or even appeal, Sue you for unreasonable demands. <>

Four. Therefore, the bathhouse operator has no responsibility at all, and the sudden death of the old man is not the reason for the bathhouse at all, but his own reasons, so it is best not to make such an unreasonable request, because no one will agree to this unreasonable request, and anyone will reject this unreasonable request, and even appeal to the court, you are an unreasonable request, you can not agree, you can refuse, the old man's family should not make such an rude request, Because no one will agree to such a request, it is better not to make such an unreasonable demand.

The operator of the bathhouse is responsible, after all, it was the accident that occurred in the bathhouse.

It depends. If the bathhouse fails to fulfill its safety obligations, such as failing to protect safety facilities and safety tips, etc., resulting in injuries to unsuspecting persons, it is necessary to bear certain responsibilities.

No, you don't. Bathroom operators should do their best to fulfill their salvage obligations. When the elderly come to the bathroom to take a bath, family members should accompany them.

For the elderly, because of their age, coupled with their own physical condition, so when something happens suddenly, it may pose a certain threat to their lives, just like we sometimes see some elderly people around us when they are old and playing mahjong, a good card may make his blood pressure rise rapidly, resulting in a sudden fainting. <>

Recently, a similar thing happened in Fengxian, Shanghai, 75-year-old Liu went to the public bath alone to take a bath, during the bath he suddenly fainted, and then the bathroom owner Zhang rescued it, and immediately called 120, but after being sent to the hospital, he died due to ineffective rescue, and then the family of the old man sued the bathroom owner Zhang to the court, claiming 500,000 yuan in compensation. <>

So is it the responsibility of the old man in Shanghai to go to the bathhouse alone to take a bath and die suddenly?

In fact, according to the provisions of China's Civil Code, all hotels, shopping malls, banks, stations, airports, stadiums, entertainment venues and other business places, public place operators, managers or social masses, and activity organizations should be responsible for the safety of the personnel present. In this case, we know that the death of the 75-year-old was caused by a sudden death caused by his own disease. <>

On the side of the operator of the bath, they also immediately rescued the old man after seeing him fall ill, and also called for help**. And they also made a warning sign in front of the bath, which is equivalent to saying that they also have the obligation to prompt, so in this way, the bath does not need to bear the liability for compensation.

Although the consciousness management party does not have to bear some criminal liability or compensation liability in this case, but the old man died in your place, it is still necessary to do some humanitarianism to give a corresponding little expression of heart.

According to Article 1198 of the Civil Code, if the operator or manager of a hotel, shopping mall, bank, station, airport, stadium, entertainment venue or other business premises or public place, or the organizer of a mass event, fails to fulfill the obligation of safety and security and causes damage to others, he shall bear tort liability. In other words, managers of public places and business premises must fail to fulfill their safety obligations before they can bear tort liability.

I think that the bathhouse may have some responsibility, like the older elderly, who should be accompanied by family members, and should not enter the bath alone.

The duty of safety and security is a legal obligation of the manager of public places or public facilities, and the principle of fault shall be applied if the violation of the duty of safety and security causes damage to others. The main controversy over whether the two defendants were liable in this case was the determination of fault.

It may be that there are too many people in the bathhouse, it may be that the old man can't find a suitable temperature for himself to take a bath, or it may be that the old man is prone to wrestling there.

The main reason why the elderly are not suitable for bathing in the bathhouse is that the temperature of the bathhouse is very high, and if you take a bath in the bathhouse for a long time, the impact on the elderly is very serious, and it is very easy to cause sudden death.

Because the bathhouse floor is slippery, and it is easy to have places that cannot be taken care of in public places, it is very dangerous for the elderly.

Hello, if you take a bath in the bathhouse and die suddenly:

1, natural sudden death, that is, he died after washing himself, without other reasons, or he ate something at home and then died as soon as he took a bath, Ling Feng should not be responsible.

2, if there is a sudden death in the bathhouse after everyone fights, there should be some responsibility, after all, you didn't manage it well when you Zheng Shi fought and shouted Wang.

3. For example, if you enter a large pool or steam room, the temperature is very high, and you will die after a while due to heart disease and high blood pressure, you should be responsible, but the general bathhouse has a warning sign, so the responsibility will be light, and the responsibility will be heavy without a brand.