Two retired elderly people, each with a family, and openly cohabiting, are it recognized bigamy?

As long as there is no marriage certificate, it does not belong to the market environment, but it is morally bad.

This issue needs to be determined by the partners of the two elderly people, and if the two partners do not file a public prosecution, others have no right to interfere.

Two retirees who both have their own families and are now living together is bigamy and can sue the court.

Two retired old people, each with a family, and live together openly, they do not belong to bigamy, belong to illegal cohabitation, you can find the local police station for mediation, if the two really want to be together, then they have to leave the family and then be together, in fact, the old people have children, should be carefully considered.

Public cohabitation should be recognized as bigamy, which refers to the illegal act of a person who has a spouse and marries another person, that is, a person has two or more marital relationships at the same time. Destroy monogamous marital relationships. The offence of bigamy is committed if a person who has a spouse marries another person, or who marries another person knowing that he or she has a spouse.

A person who has a spouse cohabiting with another person in the name of husband and wife, or who clearly knows that another person has a spouse and cohabits with him in the name of husband and wife, shall still be convicted and punished as bigamy.

The two promoters each have families, and whether the use of public cohabitation is considered bigamy? It must be bigamy, because the two retired old people have families, and they live together publicly, if it is a real couple, it is not bigamy, and if it is not a real couple, it is recognized as bigamy.

This can be considered bigamy, because they both have families, and now they are openly cohabiting, and if someone sues the court, they will be held responsible.

This is obvious bigamy, and it would certainly be inappropriate if people went to the police and they would be liable for bigamy, because they were all people with families and were now living together openly.

The two retired old people have their own families and live together openly, do they think bigamy If they live together openly, it is really bigamy, but they don't get a marriage certificate, so let's separate them quickly, it's good after separation, don't be so troublesome.

Even a retired old man with silicone oil and some oil to live together. Master, so well, this is the case for bigamy. Well, the two retired old people are both paid families, and they live together in their homes if they say no, well, if there is no husband and wife, it is not considered from, if you say one, there is one.

Jiang Fan is alone, if there is an old uncle, this is a husband, and their behavior is a kind of bigamy.

If the cohabitation is relatively long, it is considered a crime of bigamy.

Two elderly people are retired, and each has a family, and then openly cohabit, this is not considered bigamy, it must be married before and then obtain a marriage certificate with others to form a family.

The two retired old men have their own families and live together openly, so they know that it is a crime of bigamy.

The two retired teachers have their own families and live together openly, and they can identify the right pets.

The family of two retired elderly people is openly cohabiting again, is it? If bigamy is determined, then I don't think it should be considered bigamy.

2o20 years of the unit itself to determine which cadres and female workers belong to you, retirement, do not look at whether it belongs to the management position legally? If you are in a managerial position, then even if you are in a worker position, you are still in a managerial position, what position do you go to? It's not recognized by the unit, but yours and your academic qualifications.

Now there is no difference between the retirement of enterprise cadres and workers is a management position or a production line, the retirement age and the service is the same, if it is an internal retirement, it is the enterprise that has the final say, if it is a formal retirement of social security, it must be reviewed by social security, and it must be handled in accordance with the social security regulations stipulated by the state.

Whether you are a worker or a cadre, it does not mean what position you do, it is determined by the compilation of your files.

Hello. If you register your marriage, it is a legal husband and wife, and the property can be cut after marriage, but there is no identity property after only two months of marriage.

Whether the marital property is the joint property of the husband and wife depends on the agreement between the husband and wife and the provisions of the law, as follows:

If the marital property agreement clearly stipulates how the income of the husband and wife shall be distributed after marriage, then the property acquired after marriage shall be distributed in accordance with the agreement;

If there is no post-nuptial property agreement or the agreement is invalid, the provisions of the Marriage Law and the interpretation of the Marriage Law must be followed.

First: the law.

1. If the property acquired after marriage is the joint property of the husband and wife, it shall be provided for in Article 17 of the Marriage Law, including:

1) Wages and bonuses;

2) the income from production and operation;

iii) Proceeds from intellectual property rights;

4) Property obtained by inheritance or donation, except as provided for in paragraph 3 of Article 18 of this Law;

5) Other property that shall be jointly owned.

2. If the property acquired after marriage belongs to the property of one of the husband and wife, it shall be stipulated in Article 18 of the Marriage Law, including:

1) Medical expenses, living allowances for the disabled, and other expenses received by one party as a result of bodily injury;

2) Property that is determined in the will or gift contract to belong to only one of the husband or wife;

3) Daily necessities for the exclusive use of one side;

4) Other property that shall belong to one side.

Second, the Marriage Law interprets the provisions.

1.Article 11 of Interpretation 2 of the Marriage Law stipulates that the following property during the existence of the marital relationship shall be the joint property of the husband and wife.

1) Income obtained by one party from the investment of personal property.

2) Housing subsidies and housing provident funds that both men and women actually obtain or should obtain;

3) Pension insurance funds and bankruptcy resettlement compensation that both men and women have actually obtained or should have obtained.

2.Article 22 of Interpretation II of the Marriage Law provides;

1) Before the parties get married, the parents contributed to the purchase of a house for both parties, and it is clearly stated that the gift to both parties is the joint property of the husband and wife.

2) After the parties get married, if the parents contribute to the purchase of a house for both parties, it is the joint property of the husband and wife.

3.Article 5 of Interpretation 3 of the Marriage Law stipulates that the income generated by the personal property of one of the spouses after marriage shall belong to the joint property of the husband and wife, except for the fruits and self-recognition of appreciation.

4.Paragraph 2 of Article 7 of Interpretation 3 of the Marriage Law stipulates that if the property rights of an immovable property purchased by both parents are registered in the name of one of the children, the immovable property may be deemed to be jointly owned by both parties according to the share of their respective parents' contributions.

The above situations basically summarize the circumstances that belong to common property, but real life is rich and changeable, and it is impossible to summarize all of them in the above five situations, and the specific situations need to be carefully analyzed and classified.

No! You have just received a marriage license, and his property is not your share! Unless he himself is willing to compensate, it doesn't count. Standing in the law is also more protective of pre-marital property! It is not possible to get the property of the other party through marriage.

The two of you have received a marriage certificate, which is protected by the law, although it is said that there is no wedding, but if he wants to divorce you, you will definitely be able to share the joint property of the two of you after marriage, because you have been married for a short time, within two months, your joint property will definitely not be much, and your personal premarital property, you will not be able to share.

As long as the certificate is obtained, it is a normal relationship between husband and wife, and the property must be divided after a discussion.

Hello friends!

The compensation for traffic accidents belongs to the motor vehicle, as long as there is responsibility, then within the scope of compensation of compulsory traffic insurance, it is necessary to give priority to compensation, and no longer distinguish the proportion of liability.

The amount of 110,000 yuan refers to the limit of compensation for death and disability. In the case of property damage, the compensation limit is 2,000 yuan, and in the case of medical expenses, the compensation limit is 10,000 yuan. It needs to be determined by looking at the specific circumstances of the loss.