In a relationship, one party keeps compromising and retreating, why do you insist on being together?

In the relationship, one party keeps compromising and retreating, why they can still be together in the end, of course, because of the compromise and concession on that side. If there is one aspect of the relationship that constantly compromises and retreats, then it proves that the other half in love does not cherish the relationship so much. Maybe it's just talking about the person who likes him, as a pastime, or enjoying the beauty that others bring to him.

In fact, in my opinion, if you keep compromising and retreating on the one hand, then the relationship cannot continue, and you should consider whether it is time to let go. Compromising on one side will only make two people more tired, whether it's the one who backs down or the other. Of course, more injuries are compromises, and one party accepts them and chooses to compromise in order to be able to better manage the relationship.

It may seem to us that such an approach is unacceptable to us, but what you don't understand is how much a person can sacrifice for love. <>

Maybe this is the magic of love, knowing that the relationship between two people is no longer as beautiful as before, and it is even irretrievable, but they will still choose to back down, choose to compromise, and try to save this relationship. Because they believe that a miracle will bring the relationship back to its former beauty. But the truth may not really be what they want, and the constant compromises and concessions will only make the other side more difficult to accept.

Feelings are not a person's giving, not a person's blind compromise, blindly retreating, a really good relationship should be two people can understand each other, be able to feel each other's warmth, feel each other's pain. Sharing the suffering for each other and accompanying each other through hardships together, only such feelings are worthy of being cherished. Constant concessions, constant compromises, just to keep a relationship that is difficult to maintain, is this kind of relationship really good?

Is it really worth it? I want lovers in the world to end up married, but I don't want people to always be hurt because of love.

In the relationship, one party keeps compromising and making concessions, and the reason why he insists on staying together is that he can't let go of his dedication to the relationship and is unwilling to admit his failure. Maintain your so-called self-esteem.

The party who keeps compromising and giving in must be the one who pays more in the relationship, so he will pay without regrets.

I don't think there is any need to continue the relationship of repeated compromises and concessions, and the maintenance of the relationship requires the efforts of both parties, rather than the continuous concessions of one party.

Don't continue, such a relationship will not make you happy at all, and a marriage with only one person will not last.

Don't continue, because such feelings are too humbling, and even lose yourself.

There is no need to continue, it will make your life very hard, and you will not be happy at all, and there is no point in continuing on.

There is no need to continue, because if you continue, it will make your life more difficult, and if you are depressed for a long time, it will make you more and more irritable.

In fact, whether in life or work, there are indeed some problems that affect our life and work, so these seemingly inconspicuous small problems actually affect our happiness in life, so we must get rid of them.

Blind compromise and concession.

But once the balance of the relationship begins to tilt, the relationship can no longer find a suitable fulcrum to continue. So, it's not that the one who gives more is more worthwhile.

Sometimes your constant compromises and concessions are nothing more than cowardice and incompetence in the eyes of the other party, and even the canopy will become even worse. With the first concession, the next one will only go further and deeper.

There is no principled kindness.

Some people say that kindness is very precious, but if kindness does not have the ability to fight back, it is weak, and it will even be regarded by others as a sharp weapon to hurt you in the opposite direction.

Kindness is an advantage, but excessive kindness becomes a weapon to hurt people. There are people who are bent on goodness, no matter who they are. It is precisely because some people have no principled kindness that they will promote the evil of some people again and again.

In this world, not all mistakes are forgivable, and everyone should be held accountable for their actions to the end and pay the corresponding price. Anything, even if it is kind, should have a boundary.

Forgiveness without a bottom line.

Choosing to forgive others without a bottom line is actually the greatest evil to yourself. No matter what, it is always the compromised party who is hurt, and no amount of tears can be an exception. If you forgive anyone without a bottom line, the other party is likely to hurt you without a bottom line.

Whether it is a friend, a husband and wife, or a relative, they should respect each other and be equal to each other. Burying Wei's forgiveness for other people's mistakes again and again is like a dose of poison, which not only harms others, but also ultimately hurts oneself.

For anyone and everything, there should be a bottom line. Otherwise, the law is useless. When a person chooses to forgive another person again and again without a bottom line, then everything he has experienced is the end he deserves.

Should; If two people truly love each other, one party can also take the initiative to compromise and break up their relationship, avoid unnecessary quarrels, and get sincere love from the other party. Hole answering file.

Personally, I think that one of the two people must take the initiative to compromise, otherwise the relationship will be very difficult to go on.

Yes. If you keep an eye on this, the feelings between the two people will become more and more boring in their lives, and they can also get a good complement, and they will not quarrel and fight because of some things.

Because only by compromising with each other can we maintain a good relationship, and the relationship between two people can be smoother, if we do not compromise with each other, it will only escalate the conflict between two people and hurt the feelings.

It is because two people are different individuals, and it is inevitable that there will be contradictions in the process of getting along with two people, if you just blindly pursue yourself, you will definitely not be happy, so if you want to last for a long time, you must compromise.

If both parties are stubborn, then the relationship will break up quickly, and compromise does not mean weakness, but recognition of this relationship.

When there is a conflict between the two parties in love, will you compromise and give in for the sake of love?

Hello, when there is a conflict between the two parties in love, I think I will give in for love. Because to love a person, you must love all of him, tolerate his shortcomings, and know how to redeem the feelings you want. When arguing, if he doesn't look back, I'd rather compromise for the sake of love and take the initiative to talk to her.

Skillfully alleviate embarrassment and maintain the relationship between two people.

The first is to see whether the character of the husband and wife is suitable, the second is to see whether the three views of the husband and wife are appropriate, the third is to see whether the family of the husband and wife is suitable, and the fourth is to see whether the relationship between the mother-in-law and the daughter-in-law is harmonious.

Let's see if the other party can give themselves hope, and think carefully about how two people can create a world together! Two people can't accept each other, and the other party doesn't need to blindly put up with it, it's better to break up as soon as possible.

1 Whether the other party really cares about you, compromise is a must for the relationship, but both parties should compromise for the better development of the relationship between the two, not for the other party's indulgence and compromise.

2. What is the result of the compromise and whether it is in a good direction.