-
Evil teachers are not like you said who teach people to kill people and set fires without keeping the precepts, evil teachers do not speak the truth, and what they say cannot make people awaken and even cause people to find the wrong direction of enlightenment.
Today's preachers are neither evil nor righteous.
If you can't tell the truth that you have realized and practiced, you can only talk about the literary words left by people in the past. Then, if there is no right doctrine, heresy will not stand, because evil and righteousness are opposite. Therefore, most of the current preachers are neither evil nor righteous.
Please don't scold me from those who see me, let's see what those who have realized the truth have to say.
Let's take Prince Siddhartha, who is revered as Shakyamuni Buddha, for example, are all the words spoken by the Buddha in the past, or the words left behind?No, when he officially spoke for people, he did not talk about the many deeds of the Buddha in the past and the scriptures and words left by the ancient sages, but told the truth and said that he knew and experienced the truth, and what he said was of the most practical significance, which was the "fresh" knowledge that met the requirements of people from all walks of life in the real society, and the words of truth that were absolutely in line with the values of the real society at that time!
Look at those people today, most of them are chewing steamed buns that have been chewed by their predecessors, and few people say the real things they have realized. Some people chew out the salty taste, some people chew the sweetness, some people chew the fragrance, each has its own uniqueness, but no one tastes the truth is not salty, neither light nor sweet. That is the true taste that can only be tasted by self-realization and self-proof.
Therefore, they did not just talk about the truth they had practiced, and they did not even speak the truth that they had realized. What is said is crooked, and it has nothing to do with the "truth of the middle way";Everywhere you go, it's either the truth left or the truth right.
In a situation where almost everyone is like this today, is it necessary to discuss who is good and who is evil?
-
No matter what religion it is, as long as it does not abide by the rules and precepts, it is evil.
-
For example, if you tell you that 1+1=2 is a righteous teacher, and if you are told that 1+1=3 is an evil teacher, it is an evil teacher who makes essential mistakes.
People will say it wrong, people will hear it wrong, it is the righteous teacher who makes you physically and mentally stable, and it is the evil teacher who makes you physically and mentally irritable.
In the final analysis, please judge according to the four laws that the Buddha said:
1. According to the law, do not rely on people: according to the scriptures of the Buddha as the fundamental basis, do not worship individuals, 2. According to the meaning and not according to the language: according to the real meaning of the Buddhist scriptures, rather than the superficial meaning, such as taking words out of context.
3. According to the righteousness and not according to the righteousness: the basis can not let you get physical and mental stability can not be your physical and mental stability, even if the Dharma has many methods, not all of the methods are applicable to everyone, and now the Buddha says that the most suitable is to recite the Dharma.
4. According to wisdom rather than knowledge: according to reason rather than emotional impulse.
Those who violate the above four principles are evil teachers.
Amitabha.
-
When you talk about the Dharma, it sounds like the Dharma, which makes people think that this is also the Dharma, but it is not. If we say that the evil law is the correct law, the correct law is the evil law, the precepts are not the precepts, and the precepts are not the precepts, then we can define them as evil teachers.
Offering to the evil master to follow and learn, the fate will also fall together with cause and effect.
If the Fa-rectification is about to be extinguished, there is a resemblance to the Dharma. The resemblance is like the Dharma that has been born in the world, and the Dharma has been extinguished. Illegal words, illegal words; Non-law words, law words are not law. With the similarity method, the sentence is scorching, and there is no correct law. ”
The Sutra of Miscellaneous Aham
1. Asian face.
In the eyes of the Western public, a typical Asian face is a particularly handsome appearance, with slender eyebrows, melon seed face, a big bright eyes, single eyelids and double eyelids are particularly popular, this is the definition of a model face of the public, and it is also a difference with many aesthetics is probably particularly thinThe popular influence of large eyes and long eyelashes is a particularly popular professional beauty. >>>More
on TV. Monkey King "Hunan Tai".
Chen Haoming starring. >>>More
The texture of a good bird's nest is clear, you can see the fine gaps and the bird's wall is very thin, there is an obvious rough feeling when you touch it with your hands, and the soaking rate is more than 7 times, while the soaking of inferior bird's nest is only about 3 or 4 times. A good bird's nest is sweet in the mouth and has a fresh aroma of protein.
She is a strong and brave woman, independent and not beaten down by rumors and slander from the outside world, beautiful and beautiful, filial and kind, never give up on her children, and a good woman with a sense of responsibility and responsibility! And he loves sports, has a good heart, has no scheming, is straightforward and fast-talking, and his acting skills are also very mature and in place. She is a good mother to her second child! >>>More
The "Fallen Flower Cave Girl" is an unmarried woman in the tribe who can cry the leaves.