Urgent!! 100 bounty for property legal issues

During the marriage between you and your wife, the house purchased by your wife is of course joint property, and if you need to divide the property in the future, you can only provide a monthly bank repayment statement or record as proof of your capital contribution (but in the current loan policy, the name of both the main lender and the participating lender needs to be on the title deed, which is inconsistent with what you said). If you want to get more benefits when dividing the property, you should persuade your mother-in-law not to use the property certificate, but to set up a mortgage registration on the real estate certificate in your mother-in-law's name, and the registration amount is the amount of your mother-in-law's down payment. Of course, this method is only suitable for the premise that you expect the house to rise in the later stage, otherwise you should make a clear registration on the property right certificate according to the proportion of your mother-in-law's investment.

For the foreign head of household, the name on the property ownership certificate shall prevail At the time of registration, it is best to write the joint relationship between the owners of the property on the property of the property.

In a legal sense, the house is shared by your mother-in-law and your wife, who owns half of the shares, and you own a quarter of the property.

For the down payment of the money, you will need to keep proof of deposit.

Although the name is written in the name of your daughter-in-law, you are husband and wife, and this is your 'marital' joint property. And not 'pre-marital'. Personally, I think this house has your share.

A is the third party, B is the plaintiff, C is the defendant, and D is the first person in the lawsuit.

For this case, there should be an arbitration institution to arbitrate as agreed, but the parties first sued to the court, and the other party did not raise any objection to the lawsuit, so the court also has jurisdiction.

In this case, the courts of place A, place B, place C, place where the contract was signed, and place of performance all have jurisdiction over the lawsuit B, which is the present lawsuit, and the D**C v. B is the counterclaim

1.If it constitutes a minor injury, the public security organ may investigate and transfer it to the procuratorate, and the procuratorate will then file a lawsuit with the court, pursuing the criminal responsibility of the beater, and at the same time demanding compensation for the victim's economic losses; It is also possible to file a civil lawsuit for damages in court yourself.

2.The judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court has specific provisions on what items can be claimed for compensation, and may be raised on a case-by-case basis after the injury has healed or been determined.

3.If the beater is an adult, he shall be liable for compensation; In the case of minors, his parents are liable for compensation.

Can give you a few suggestions.

1.First, determine the background of those young people in society. If it's ordinary people. If you want revenge, call the police. (Go to the hospital and get a certificate stating the severity of your condition).

2.This kind of is generally a little hooligan who has an older brother who is a local hooligan. But they can do anything. It's better not to mess with them. Now, they are all young people in their 20s. Just go to the hospital and check that it's fine.

You're talking about mental effects.

Hope it helps.

You can ask me other questions and we can talk about them in detail.

The words are vague and generally specific, but it is not possible to estimate the level of disability and the city where it is located, because the per capita income and consumption level of each city cannot be estimated. Let's say it's Shanghai. Beijing.

In developed areas such as Shenzhen, where the per capita income is higher, the amount of claims will naturally increase. In third-tier cities, claims are still estimated according to local income status and consumption quality.

1: I believe the school has adopted the law** to defend the student's rights. Then the police will naturally be alarmed at this time, and then the authority of the police can be used to restrain the offender from paying for the "initial" full body examination, for example.

CT scan. B-ultrasound. Cranial examination.

High-tech whole-body scans such as subnuclear resonance to check for damage to body parts. And ask the hospital to keep the test sheet for unnecessary trouble later.

2: Mental illness can not be ignored, it is strongly recommended to spend tens of thousands of yuan to invite senior professors to carry out psychological education, if there is a shadow in the heart, afraid of being blocked after school, then there will be no mood to read, affecting the child's future.

3: At this time, it is not trivial, which shows the lack of management level of the school. Although the teacher rescued him in time, I believe that this senior student may not be a first-time offender, so why would the school take this student in to endanger the student? The school has third-party liability.

I'm sorry, I don't know the level of consumption in your place of residence, so I can't make a comprehensive estimate, but I can consult with a local lawyer, and a foreign lawyer can't help you. The consultation fee is 120-300 yuan.

Personally, I think you should report the case, so that the matter will be a little bigger, if he is arrested, then his life will be like this, if that student still wants to take the college entrance examination, then his parents will definitely come forward to solve it, so that if you ask for a little more, they will not refuse, for the sake of his son, he can't refuse. If it's all settled, just go and close the case. I'm a bit of a loser with this method, haha.

To deal with such people, you have to use this method.

It is recommended to hire a lawyer directly to handle it, so as to maximize the benefits.

I feel sorry for you to come across something like this. But for your question, I don't think it can be defined in this way, the main thing is that there must be evidence before it can be accepted by the court.

It's hard for us to judge this online. If you want to sue in court, you still need to find a lawyer.

If you want to be private, then you look at the medical expenses, and it is not too much to ask for an estimate of tens of thousands of yuan for mental loss and nutrition, after all, it will have to be discussed before it can be decided.

It doesn't matter if you add points or not, I hope to give you some advice.

First of all, I asked the student and his parents to compensate for the damages, and then asked the school to give an explanation why no one cared about him for so long! Filing a lawsuit with the Law Court.

Finding a lawyer is more systematic and formal.

The case should be reported, and then the issue of compensation is being said! It's okay to lose 10,000!

It turns out that your colleague's son is yourself.

Ignore it, and the court will not support them.

Your situation is:1First of all, they have a legal basis to sue your mother for the following reasons:

First of all, if your lord dies, if he does not leave a will, and the house is the joint property of your grandma and your lord, then his property is inherited jointly by your grandma, your mother, your two aunts and your uncle, that is, your lord's property is scored as 5 points, one for each person, and your uncle renounces the right to inherit (it is better to have a testamentary agreement). Then your uncle's share will be divided into 4 equal parts, and your grandmother, your mother, and your two aunts will inherit it.

2.Their request to change back to the title deed is also correct. Your mother can negotiate with them and give them their share according to the demolition fee, which is also possible, so that there is no need to change the title deed.

3.If the house is your grandma's, your grandma is in charge of her own affairs, and it has nothing to do with anyone else.

If you don't understand, you can consult a lawyer!

In addition to Grandma's share, half of the house should belong to Grandpa, Grandpa's property, and your two aunts also have the right to inherit!

It is seriously advisable to entrust a lawyer to handle this. If you are in Shanghai, you can contact our lawyer.

Judging from the receipt, the company's claim is untenable. Combined with the entire background of the case as you mentioned, the preliminary judgment is that the interpretation of "clear, no objection" to mean "clear, but not settled" is not valid. If the other party wants to prove this interpretation, it is very difficult to interpret the rules according to the standard clauses of China's contract law; And the burden of proof is not on your side.

Welcome to call, I have it in my user profile.

1.My dad and my mom broke a man's leg together, but it wasn't a disability. My dad and my mom were a few meters away from him at the time, how could they hit him!

If you want to get an accurate answer, it's best to make things clear so that you can help you figure it out.

2.My mom didn't know about it at the time and didn't agree to mediation. Whether the premises are illegal.

The mediation at the police station is not legally enforceable, and it depends entirely on the willingness of both parties. If your mom doesn't agree, you can convince your dad not to agree to mediation.

Mediation at the police station is normal and not illegal, unless the police station compels you to mediate.

3.It was clear that my mom and dad really didn't hit him. All the evidence at the police station also suggests this.

Since you didn't hit someone, and there is no evidence that you hit or pushed, then there is no need for compensation, let alone mediation.

4.That person was later identified as not disabled at all, not even level 10.

If it is a fight, it is not necessary to reach the level of disability 10, as long as it constitutes a minor injury, criminal liability can be pursued, and civil liability can be claimed if there is an injury.

In a word, if you really didn't fight, then there is no need for compensation, no mediation, if you hit someone, then you can mediate or not, but if you beat the other party to the extent of minor injury, it is recommended to mediate, otherwise there is a possibility of being sentenced.

Put the names of the police station and the people in the police station on the Internet, and post the whole thing on the Internet

If the evidence is sufficient, go through the legal route! ~

Does that person have any background in the bureau?

Your mother insists that what is correct is your speculation (which is in question), although there is no evidence, but not without possibility.

The crux of the matter is, what is there in the agreement signed by your father besides losing money?

Please add additional questions.

If you don't do anything at the police station, if you think you can't compensate, then you won't compensate It's very simple, it's reasonable, and the police station can't do anything If the police station violates the law and engages in coercive measures, you can sue them for violating the law, abusing power, and dereliction of duty!

If your dad agrees, your dad must have made a transcript.

It is said that the police station is wrong and needs to be proven.

The point is that the solution adopted at that time was mediation: mediation was voluntary between the parties, and the police station was not responsible. Because it's not the police station that decides what to do. So it's hard to say what's wrong with the police station.

Hope you understand this.

Evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence, evidence is the most important thing, the police station must have evidence to prove that it was your parents who injured the other party in order to demand compensation, and at the same time, your parents can finally come up with evidence to prove that they did not hurt the other party.

In addition, it is not illegal for the police station to coax and deceive my father to pay 30,000 yuan, your father is an adult, and paying the money belongs to his own legal act, but he can ask for it back.

You can refuse to mediate, and if you voluntarily mediate the actions of the police station, it is not illegal. Since there is evidence that it is not your fault, ignore him and wait for him to sue you.

What's the problem???

Additional answer: This has nothing to do with whether your mother agrees or not, the main thing is that if your father does not admit it, the police station should do its due diligence to find out the truth of the matter. But there is a certain degree of difficulty, it is best to give that person an injury evaluation to see how he was injured, even if he fell and injured himself, if it is involved in the factors of your parents, they should also bear some responsibility.

It's not that the police station says that you have to agree to mediation, and mediation can only be carried out if both parties agree. However, if such an act of mediation is filed, the court will not accept it.

If it is not illegal, one of the joint infringers is willing to bear the responsibility, and after compensation, it can recover from other infringers.

Whether or not your parents are responsible depends on the investigation of the public security organs, and if your parents jointly committed the violation, your father compensated your mother and the other party agreed not to pursue the matter. Not illegal.

First of all, you need to make sure that you have not broken your leg, if so, it can be very troublesome!

Article 234 of the Criminal Law.

Whoever intentionally injures the body of another person is to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release.

Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years;

Judging from the situation you described, there may be pushing and shoving together, and if that person's leg is broken as a result, in addition to compensating for medical expenses and many other expenses, you can also find someone to apply to the prosecutor's office for prosecution, asking the prosecutor's office to prosecute your parents for intentional injury. If so, things will be more troublesome.

Your parents are joint tortfeasors, and the police mediate the dispute between the two parties, which is not in violation of the law, and it is not illegal for your father to pay unilaterally. If you think that this amount is too high or that you do not have any responsibility, you can go to court and let the court decide.

Your father agreed to compensate, and the police station's practice is not illegal.

If he was injured by a fall, if he wants you to pay compensation, he must show evidence to prove that you were injured.

If your dad signs an agreement admitting that he injured him, then you will be more passive and may have to compensate each other for medical expenses, hospitalization expenses and other expenses.

The police station is all with mud, and the two sides reconcile, it can't be said that they are breaking the law by doing this.

The crime of theft is constituted, but the punishment can be mitigated because of the act of returning the stolen goods. If the public security organs verify that Wang was guilty of this only one theft, and can obtain the victim's forgiveness during the investigation or prosecution stage, the procuratorate is very likely to make a decision not to prosecute. If, after initiating a public prosecution, the procuratorate can obtain the victim's forgiveness at the court's first-instance trial, the court may give a lighter punishment.

All in all, the key is whether Wang is the only one theft and whether he can get the victim's forgiveness. Whether or not the victim's forgiveness can be obtained has now become an important criterion for sentencing by judicial organs.