What does true fairness look like?

Fairness means that things are handled reasonably and without favoring one party or one person, that is, each person involved in social cooperation bears his due responsibility and gets the benefits he deserves. It feels unfair if a person takes on less responsibility than they should have, or achieves more benefits than they deserve. The Tao Te Ching says, "Heaven and earth are not benevolent, and all things are used as dogs; The saints are unkind, and they use the people as dogs.

It means that heaven and earth do not make a distinction between sentient beings, whether they are sentient beings or ruthless sentient beings, and regard all sentient beings as equal, which is the great benevolence of heaven and earth. The saints do not distinguish between the people, but also treat the people as heaven and earth do to all things. Regardless of whether the people are good or evil, they are treated equally, which is the great benevolence of the saints.

It can be seen as a kind of fairness in general aspects, and it is also the real fairness that Lao Tzu thinks. It is also the fairness of the whole history and macro, and it can also be said to be absolutely fair.

Of course, in fact, sometimes different people may have different perceptions of the fairness of the same thing. Factors such as the individual's environment, his or her experiences and values, or the perception of interests in the group to which he or she belongs, may be considered differently. Absolute fairness can only be judged from the point of view of history, from the whole race, from the whole macro.

That's why there is no such thing as absolute fairness, because we always take action from a certain range to consider whether it is fair or not. For example, something that is not valuable in place A1 is valuable in place B, and something that is not valuable in place B2 is valuable in place A. There was a personal amount of this in place A1 and the people in place B in exchange for some items they needed2.

The people of Adi thought that they had taken advantage of it. But from the point of view of B, they exchanged their very cheap things for a large number of precious items, and they took advantage of themselves. So who is taking advantage?

In fact, from the overall macro point of view, it is fair at this time, they take what they need, exchange what they have in large quantities for what they are lacking, and complement each other. There is no such thing as unfairness.

In fact, in life, it is impossible to be absolutely fair. We are not going to be saints. Therefore, what we have to do is not to be selfish, not to violate the law and the bottom line of morality, and not to violate the bottom line of personal morality.

The so-called absolute fairness is a measure of measure, not a measure of action. In reality, as long as it is generally fair, it is very good, and you can't expect the fairness of others, otherwise, you will suffer a lot. I'm sure you also know it's impossible.

Therefore, it is enough to memorize Lao Tzu's words and understand the profundity of ancient culture.

Now I still believe that there is real fairness in the world, that is, you are too naïve, look at the point, don't drill the horns, and don't dwell on the so-called fairness. Since birth, too many people are no longer at a starting line, let alone at this age, let alone expect any fairness. It's okay to live your own wonderful life.

That's not fair, it only shows the basic difference between the strong and the weak,。。

True fairness is that only the degree of subjective effort determines the distribution of wealth in society.

Natural physical condition (IQ, health, etc.), family economic status, good or bad family education, selective promotion system, selective recruitment system, support from parents' connections, luck in a lifetime, etc. All of this determines your actual ability to work in the end, but all of this is unfair. And what we practice is the so-called fair distribution according to work, but the best labor ability is not fair, how can the distribution according to work be considered fair?

For example, two babies A and B are born with a low IQ, a poor family, and uneducated parents. b Born intelligent, his family is rich, and his parents are knowledgeable. A studied hard for 8 hours a day, but he didn't learn much, and he was unlucky, and finally became a farmer, and he couldn't farm well, but he worked hard every day.

b Strive to study 8 hours a day and go to the best elementary school, middle school, university. After graduation, there is a good opportunity to enter a large international company, creating hundreds of millions of dollars worth every year.

But A and B work at the same level. Then their income should be the same every year. That's true fairness.

Obviously, this absolute fairness must have a great impact on efficiency. Only a communist society with extremely developed social wealth is possible.

Fairness: Impartiality and impartiality. Generally, it refers to the average of all the attributes (including input, acquisition, etc.) of all participants (people or groups). The public is fair and reasonable, and can receive broad support; Flat means equal and average.

Fairness is generally achieved in an ideal state, and there is no absolute fairness.

Modern society and morality advocate fairness, and fairness is also the basis for the development of all competitive activities. However, there is no such thing as fairness in the true sense, and fairness is generally guaranteed by laws and agreements, and is formulated by the initiators (key members) of the activity and participates in compliance.

2 Is there true fairness in this world?