What is the best segment for Nikon 18 300mm1 3 5 6 3GED imaging?

As far as it is described, the imaging is very average with a large zoom head like this. There is no such thing as the best segment for imaging. It can only be said that the 50 starts are about the same.

This kind of head is not recommended for novices to practice.

I don't know how to continue asking, satisfied.

If he's the latest result in this, his best should be around 150 years old, and you can adjust the focus of the process again, or lead this, and then make some judgments based on your own experience.

It's still pretty good to see things.,It's just that this Nikon thing is still pretty good.。。

In this case, there is no problem at all, it's okay, and relatively speaking, it's better if it's in paragraphs, and the power achieved is about 50 words.

If you want to image the best segment, it should actually be the same as his anchor.

The imaging rate of this camera at 183 steel 300 mm is relatively good.

Nikon 18 to 300 mm, it's the best segment of the image, that's it.

What is the best segment for Connie imaging? I think like this Connie, his prime minister is more than that, I think it is generally possible to query the information.

More and more hobbies, friends who like photography, he wants to buy a variety of cameras or video cameras, in order to take pictures, to choose a good brand.

Generally speaking, the best image is almost diamond-studded, and the best image requires six paragraphs.

Nikon 8-3 zero daughters, memory cd imaging best how much to earn that most 41920x, 1080.

In fact, I think this kind of mainly depends on your personal needs, and then which one you need, which one is the best.

Nikon 1830, you can go to the bank's official website to check it, or ask his customer service or something.

I don't know much about this, so you can consult a professional who sells this thing.

Nikon to 300mm to a ratio. What is the best segment for off-site imaging.

The focal length of the lens can be adjusted from 18mm to 300mm.

The lens aperture is maximum at 18mm; Maximum at 300mm.

Lenses of this focal length.

Commonly known as the travel head, it is a lens that includes the focal length and corresponding functions of the wide-angle lens, standard lens and telescope lens, which is very convenient and easy to carry.

18－300mm：

This is a zoom lens (focal length variable), with the longest focal length end of 300mm and the shortest focal length end of 18mm;

This is a non-constant aperture lens with a maximum aperture at the longest focal length end (300mm) and a maximum aperture at the shortest focal length end (18mm).

The big zoom is not necessarily a dog's head, it can also be a bull's head, for example, Canon has a red circle lens that is 28-300... But your Nikon 18-300 is really a doghead, or a half-frame doghead.

Well, the big zoom is all dog heads, and bull heads can't do such big zooms.

Generally speaking, the zoom lens is relatively the best focal length for imaging, with the two ends as the second, and the middle slightly closer to the wide-angle segment.

The "relative best aperture" of a lens is when the maximum aperture of the lens is 2 to 3 stops lower.

Telephoto imaging is better than short-focus, with the optimal aperture around f8.

The focal length is around 24, and the aperture is the best.

18-35 is a standard wide angle, suitable for shooting landscapes; About 50 is the standard, suitable for life photos; The 75-105 is best for portraits.

Trouble, thanks!

3. Compare all of these 2 lenses First compare the full name of the model Some parameters can be seen from it:

Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 55-300mm F ed VR

Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 18-300mm F ed VR

Judging from these two models, the maximum aperture at the telephoto end of the two lenses is different, and the maximum aperture at the wide-angle end is different.

18-300 is one level larger than 55-300, and for large zoom lenses, the larger the aperture, the more difficult it is to work, and the 18-300 multiple is greater than 55-300, that is to say, the comparison on the aperture of these 2 lenses, 18-300 wins

Compare the appearance of 2 lenses:

Looking at the position of the focus ring, it is obvious that the structure of the 18-300 is an ultrasonic motor, and compared with the general motor, this structure focuses faster, more accurately, and quieter, so the lens structure is still 18-300 wins.

Comparison of the internal lens structure of the 2 lenses:

55-300 lens with 2 elements of ED lens 18-300 lens with 3 elements of ED lens Therefore, such results generally show that 18-300 has better imaging color than 55-300. Looking at the image quality chart above, it can also be concluded that the 18-300 imaging is more stable than the 55-300 at all focal lengths, and it is also better.

55-300 lens no aspherical lens 18-300 has 3 aspherical lenses Everyone knows that the lens distortion control performance depends on aspherical lenses, so the 18-300 is also better than the 55-300 in distortion control

Comparison lens aperture 55-300 58mm 18-300 77mm Larger aperture can allow more light to enter at the same aperture, and the shape will be more powerful and pulled, hehe, so this is also 18-300 wins.

At the same time, because the 18-300 lens covers a focal length greater than 55-300, and also uses so many technologies to improve the imaging level, so you don't need to look at the sample to know that the 18-300's overall performance exceeds 55-300 is certain

At the same time, ** also illustrates this point 18-300 6000 yuan 55-300 as long as about 2300 This gap is not a little bit and a half

Overall comparison of these 2 lenses, 18-300 beats the owner of the building to choose a large zoom lens, this head is still good, because of the addition of ED lenses and aspherical lenses, it is difficult to image this lens is particularly poor, and the focal length is also more realistic.

Of course, there's no way to compare a lens with a zoom lens that is so large and a zoom lens that has the same technology, and that's a certain amount of a lens like a 24-70 or a 70-200 lens that is definitely better than an 18-300

But alone in terms of 18-300 and 55-300 2.

18-300 victory.

Pure hand play Welcome to ask.

Nikon 55-300 vs. 18-300. As shown below;

This is not a constant-aperture lens, it's wide-angle, maximum aperture, and at the telephoto end, if you want a constant aperture, you can set the aperture there.

Nikon 18-300mm F ed VR lens. This is what the Internet says about one shot to go all over the world! Nothing is perfect, and this lens has both zoom and wide angles, so if you want to combine both, you can't do it now.

Every function of such a lens cannot be powerful, and in fact, it is just like the evaluation of netizens who have used it. So to sum up: this lens is suitable for entry-level photography enthusiasts, with a low to medium price-performance ratio.

1. Precise focusing, 28-300mm large zoom each focal length zoom is correct, from 28 focal length to 300, quickly without the slightest sense of hesitation. 2.The SWM Quiet Fluctuation Motor has a very light sound and fast speed when working, and there is no sound in outdoor shooting, and the noise is almost zero, which is pleasing to the eye compared to the lens of the bellows.

3.It is also a macro lens, which can shoot in meters in the focal length of 28-300mm, so that you can save a macro lens, and you can also enjoy the microscopic world when shooting flowers and macro and animals with a telephoto length. 4.

The lens not only adopts a lens structure of 19 elements in 14 groups, including 2 LED lenses and 3 aspherical lenses, but also has a filter size of 77mm, which is clearer than the telephoto 67mm in the same category, improving the grade of the lens. 5.Although the lens body is made of engineering plastics, it is also an advantage in my opinion, think about carrying a few heavy lenses to go out for framing or travel sweaty embarrassment, this moderate weight is about 800g, covering 28-300mm focal length is a blessing for the elderly and frail photography enthusiasts.

Cons: 1Background (bokeh) bokeh is less than ideal. 2.The wide-angle end is not wide enough, and the 28mm wide-angle on a half-frame machine will lose a lot.

Summary: Cost-effective, a must-have for going out to shoot or travel, a good lens for traveling all over the world with one shot, and excellent imaging.

In addition, I have not heard of 24-300.