Nikon D3200 VR18 55 KIT DSLR Digital Camera How is it so cheap?

First of all, this camera is no longer a **. Secondly, from the perspective of the overall camera market trend, the ** of ordinary half-frame digital SLR is also gradually declining, and full-frame SLR or mirrorless cameras are gradually rising. Even Nikon's recent retro SLR DF is only about 20,000.

People have realized that a DSLR doesn't bring them anything, and there are too many people who buy a SLR.

The configuration is not bad, D3100 is new, and the overall level is definitely stronger. The biggest difference between the two is that the image sensor of D3000 is CCD, while the biggest advantage of D3100 is high sensitivity, but the image quality and color at low sensitivity are not as good as CCD. That's why many Nikon users already have better DSLRs, but still keep old machines like the D3000 and D60 that use CCDs.

I've compared the D90 (also CMOS) and the D3000 at low sensitivity**, and it's true that the D3000 is slightly better, but only at low sensitivity.

I'm just saying that the D3000 is not worthless. If you plan to buy a DSLR and play casually, it's still D3100, after all, it is new, and the versatility is better.

D3100 is a replacement for D3000 **In addition to the reason of the machine itself, because the positioning is quite D3100 After the launch of D3000, D3000 inevitably seems redundant, **It is inevitable that there will be a decline.

The D3100 is a big upgrade over the D3000.

In addition to the same lens, there are many differences between the machine, the biggest one is that the pixels and sensitivity are different. Also, the shooting effect is not the same, and the processor of the camera has also been upgraded to the 2nd generation.

It's not much worse It's still d3100 If you can add a little bit d5100 it's good at least the screen pixels seem to be around a million d3000 d3100 The screen pixels of d3100 are only 230,000 It doesn't look very convenient.

D3100 is **, good! It's not expensive!

That's what I use, and I think it's the best value for money.

The colors are clear and sharp, which is nice.

Of course, if you need something better, the SLR is mainly the lens.

In addition to the standard ones, I also bought a 10-24mm wide-angle and a 77mm CPL and a 18-inch prime ratio.

Anyway, I think it's great value.

You see, the ** of the SLR is very high, and this ** is really at the bottom, and mine is bought on JD.com.

It was 3890 when I bought it

The screen is slightly lower, but the computer is very clear. 550d 600d is the opposite.

In addition, when taking pictures, the focal length can be focused, but 550d and 600d are not.

A cheap and easy-to-use machine among the c-secondary machines.

If it's just for travel and life, it's enough. The image quality of the SLR is obviously a grade higher than that on the card surface, but the difference in image quality between good SLR and poor SLR in image quality is not so intuitive. In addition, the D3100 is a half-frame camera, and if you shoot a lot of landscapes, it is recommended to have a wide-angle lens.

You need to be cautious when buying a single reaction, and I thought the same as you at the beginning. I just thought I could buy a set of cameras to use, and after a year, I had burned a lot of lenses and was ready to change to the D800.

First of all,It is more than one or two times more powerful than ordinary household card machines,This18-55The focal length of the lens is used very frequently,Although the quality of the pullover is different from those bull heads,But the home is completely enough,For novices,Use this set of lenses to practice as soon as possible to familiarize yourself with the camera,Jingdong's things are generally ** and with invoices。

Finally, I think if you're not in a hurry, you can also take a look at other cameras, and the Canon 550D is also good.

This camera is not recommended to buy, the grade is too low, since the purchase of SLR should be at least more than mid-range, it is recommended to buy Nikon D90 sets, sell high and low, and you will regret it after a while. I just bought a low-end machine first, and it didn't take a year to replace it.

Hello, it is recommended that you buy it above, the price is more preferential than Jingdong, and there are many **collocation. **There are Hong Kong goods and national banks, and invoices can also be issued, and the price is not the same. It's up to you to choose.

Hong Kong goods are generally guaranteed by the store, that is, if there is a problem and need to be sent back, the Bank of China can guarantee it nationwide for one year.

I used the Nikon D3100 before, and it was transferred in the past two days. I originally wanted to add multiple 55-200 lenses, and the Yongnuo 565 flash made do, but I found that there were too many functions that were not supported, so I had to change the phone.

In general, D3100 is an entry-level machine, when you use it for a period of time, you will find that it has a lot of shortcomings, many functions are not, if your positioning is ordinary home, it is OK, if you want to continue to improve in the field of SLR in the future, it is not recommended to buy D3100. 18-55 This lens is average, you can deal with the characters and the scenery, the picture can only be said to be decent, and the technology is also a little related. If you have the budget, buy 18-135 or 18-200.

The best lens for portraits is a 50 prime head.

You can directly enter "SLR camera" in **There will be various levels of SLR sales rankings, you can refer to it, and Zhongguancun also has a lot of SLR reviews.

Learn more about it, I was in too much of a hurry to buy it before, and now I have lost more than 1,000 yuan.

Nikon D3000 SLR Set (AF-S DX 18-55mm F VR) Nikkor The former is more cost-effective The better is definitely D3100, because it is a new machine, and all aspects of the functions are available

There are 2600 for sale, but it's cheap! The quality is also relatively good.

Don't be that expensive, don't have giveaways...

Fortunately, I have played with these 2 machines, and the comprehensive performance of 500D is better than D3100. However, in terms of overall cost performance, D3100 is a little better than 500D. We analyze it from 5 aspects:

1. Brand; Nikon and Canon have roughly the same brand and market share. So it doesn't matter who you choose. 0：0

2. Quality: The feeling after personal play is that the 500D feels better, after all, the fuselage is larger than the D3100. 0：1

3. Performance: The focusing speed and resolution of the screen of 500D are better than those of D3100, but the high sensitivity and noise control of D3100 and the sleeve (18 55) are better than those of 500D. 0：1

4. **:d 3100 is also a few hundred yuan cheaper. 1：1

5. After-sales: Nikon and Canon's after-sales sales should still have more channels and after-sales points. 1：2

6. Lens: The two machines are hot-selling products in terms of the number of users and model exchanges, so there is no problem.

However, in terms of the choice of half-frame lenses, Nikon's mid-range and low-end lenses are large, not expensive, and the quality workmanship is stronger than Canon's. 2:2, the final result is still half a catty. So it shouldn't be difficult to choose 1 out of 2 according to your own needs.

It's not a level at all. The D3100 corresponds to the Canon 1000D

The D3100 does not have a fuselage motor, and it will be a little more expensive to accompany the lens in the future.

Bear to afford to buy 500d, Canon's color imaging is more pleasing.

It is Nikon's ASP-C dedicated zoom lens, which is basically the lowest configuration lens in its class, and Nikon ASP-C has a full-frame magnification of *, which is equivalent to full-frame.

2.The CCD of the general card machine is 1 inch, the conversion full-width magnification is *, and the focal length of 18-55VR is equivalent to the focal length of the general card machine.

3.The aperture is constant, all at all.

4.I don't understand what you mean by optical zoom.

5.Regarding the Canon SX40, the CCD of the machine is 1 inch, with a conversion magnification of * relative to full-frame, and its nominal focal length is , converted to full-frame. In addition, its aperture is: Personally, I don't think this kind of camera can talk about the image quality, especially the image quality of night shooting.

It is an entry-level Nikon and does not have a focus motor, so the autofocus function is only available when using lenses with a motor (18-55VR has a motor). It has nothing to do with whether or not you change the lens.

At present, the ASP-C ASP format mirrorless and single electric ** has generally not dropped to 2000-3000, and D3100 as an entry-level intercept SLR is sometimes more for 2000 3000 cameras. For example, the larger size of the CMOS (better image quality and high sensitivity), the shorter shutter lag, the faster continuous shooting, the unique framing method of the SLR, the longer battery life, and the more lens resources (of course, the old lens can only focus manually) This costs ......But that's pretty good.

The imaging size of the SLR and the card machine is different,D3100It is an ASP-C size,Although it is not as good as the full frame,But it is much larger than the card machine,This time the image effect and noise control are not the same grade as the card machine。 So in terms of night shooting effect, the SLR is better than the SX40 you said (of course, I'm talking about handheld, and the effect is better if it's on the shelf, but the card should also be okay). As for the autofocus of the lens, the dog head is with a motor, so it supports autofocus, as for some old Nikon class D lenses, because the lens itself does not have a motor, and the D3100 body does not have a motor, so it cannot be autofocused, and can only be adjusted manually.

The 18 55 lens is equivalent to 27 magnification in ASP-C format), which is more than enough for everyday shooting. You also said that you are a newbie, so the dog head is still very good. It doesn't matter if the camera is a dog, just be a minotaur!

Hope it helps.

First of all, you don't have to question the night shooting ability of the SLR.

As long as it is a DSLR, the night scene ability is much better than that in the card machine. 18-55 wide lenses.

The capacitance angle is actually not 18mm, because the D3100 is not a full-frame camera, so if you multiply it by a conversion factor, Nikon is, the wide angle of this lens is about 27mmThe zoom factor can be obtained by dividing 55 by 18. Aperture is the word.

This refers to the maximum aperture. The 18-55 lens is capable of autofocus, and as long as the Nikon lens has an "AF-S" symbol on it, it means that the lens is capable of autofocusing. Compared to cameras that are neither single electric nor SLR, then they are nothing more than some DCs.

Rest assured, a DSLR is a SLR after all, and DC will never be able to get a SLR.

1. The use of the decision needs to be demanded, and your use is to look at the computer screen, and occasionally rinse it.

Within 8 inches of dao, 10 years later, there is a card machine that is enough for you.

2. The biggest difference between the card and the SLR imaging effect is (bokeh, depth of field, dynamic range) 3. D3100 can autofocus with all AF-S lenses, but not with AF lenses.

There are many more differences It is recommended that you go to the local dealer who bought the camera for a few days and try as many as you can.