Recommend some periscope cameras to me

Haha, I misunderstood, looking at your sighs, I thought there was some helpless taste. Since the little sister herself uses the optional Canon ixus series; Although the lens is telescopic, it is still small and delicate. Canon has a good reputation.

You can choose an optical viewfinder, and the framing attached to the face can reduce shaking and save power.

There are two options around 2000.

1.You get what you pay for.

2.The principle of imaging affects the image quality.

Since you don't care about any of that, choose what looks good within your budget.

For example, the Sony T77

In terms of card machines, Samsung PL51 is absolutely cost-effective.

The Fujifilm camera series is worth recommending, mainly because the imaging effect is good, and buying a camera is not to take pictures very clearly.

Fujifilm Z31 is less than 1000 yuan, 3x optical zoom, optical image stabilization, sound camera, slide periscope lens is very small and portable.

Fujifilm cameras are very cost-effective.

Knock down the machine that uses the XD card. This kind of card is too easy to break, and it's really helpless to lose it.

The SLR is 450D! Some time ago, I just bought a 500d in the **Canon 0101 mall authorized by the official website, and the SLR*** is still Canon!

Ha ha! It is recommended that you can go to the Canon 0101 mall to see the A480, and the quality is not bad!

Don't buy a card machine when you buy a portable machine, because the imaging function is better than that of a card machine, and it is easy to carry and hold.

News photography covers a lot of things, to be able to adapt to a variety of scenes, environments, low light, complex light, etc., sony, T system first excludes, too thin to grasp unstable, others squeeze it is easy to get out of the hand (the year before last to shoot the sports meeting I used T10 as a single-lens reflex backup machine to understand this), the imaging is very poor in low light conditions.

The materials and workmanship of the Canon A-series cameras are not good, the slow response of the machine, the long shutter lag is very bad for capturing, and the imaging is poor in low-light conditions, if you shoot a press conference or something like that, only indoor light environment will not work.

If you have an extra budget of 500, you can buy the Nikon P5100, which I think is a good fit, and if it's not too big, you can buy the Canon S5 (if you have an S3, you can buy the S3).

To say that there are only Fujifilm F40 and F50 around 2000, the advantages are 1, the large size CCD ensures the image quality and anti-noise ability under high sensitivity, 2, the response is fast, the switch on and off is very fast, the shutter lag is very small (close to the SLR), to ensure that you can successfully capture, 3, more power-saving.

If you can find Fujifilm F31 on the market, you don't need to buy F40 and F50, although F31 is an older generation of products, but basically stronger than F40 and F50 in all aspects of performance, now as my SLR standby has been half a year, basically no dissatisfaction.

Summary: 1. It is recommended to add silver to buy P5100 or S5 (S3).

2. The existing budget seriously considers F40 and F50, among which F40 is more recommended, and now ** is about 1550, and there is still money left to buy cards and backup electricity.

canon ix75

I'm okay with it.

Or buy Sony's.

Home machines are pretty much the same.

I now use Canon A650, 10 million phases, very cost-effective Black and silver, more professional and more high-grade than the card machine.

Canon's is good, but I think Sony's is more convenient for you.

Canon's lenses are all telescopic, and it's not very convenient for you to sit on the news, and switch or something.

Sony is periscope-type, and the start-up and shutdown are very fast, and it will not protrude out and a lens will be broken if it touches the **.

I use the Sony T20 and it feels pretty good. And Sony knows everything, and is not afraid of falling, so it is more suitable for you.

Check out Canon's card player! Very good, I don't know the model anymore.

Canon's is more suitable, there used to be A610, now it's A640 and the like.

The appearance is also more like a professional machine, and it is very good for ordinary families!

**Around 3000 RMB.

There are also models that were out of stock a few months ago, which have fewer functions than the A610, but they are light and compact, and only need two batteries, so it is more suitable for students to buy them at their own expense! A little more than 2000 **.

You can go to the second-hand forum of students and ask, many of them are ninety percent new.

I can't say anything about these ones you get. It's all very tiring models, so you'd better save it.

I recommend you an American Kodak C140, which is one of the few cameras with suitable phases.

It could be five or six hundred dollars.

These models you listed are really not as good as the second-hand cameras that a guy searched for on the Internet yesterday and paid 300 yuan each. I'll find you the address later.

Look at how I got it back.

GM GE G2 may be better, if you want non-Japanese products, then of course the internal ones like Aiming are all Japanese, such as CCDs, integrated circuits, etc. And GE is not something that can be ruled out.

There are very few truly non-Japanese digital cameras, and most of the people who produce these home DCs are our part-time workers in Asia (except Japan).

You are so patriotic. Patriot those two are good. See what you like.

It's still good for Japanese goods, this is no way to do it, hehe......

Since you used Panasonic before, I recommend Panasonic to you, Panasonic's machine is good.

I recommend two high-end machines for you, the card telephoto ZS7Manual King LX3

The background blur of the portable machine can basically only be achieved under the macro... If you don't care, consider the single battery, the picture quality is very close to the SLR, Panasonic G1 GF1 or Olympus EPL1 EP1, if you have general requirements for image quality, Panasonic FZ35, now it is very cost-effective.

1000 yuan, recommend Nikon S5100, consumer digital, require merchants to match batteries, bags and other accessories should not need to be bought.

The most important thing to buy a camera is to see the quality, Canon's camera is quite good Especially the IXUS 115 HS, which uses a wide-angle LCD screen, which makes it easy to see the picture even from the side, and it is very convenient to shoot at high and low angles or share with many people. A high-sensitivity CMOS sensor with approximately 12.1 million effective pixels and a DigiC 4 digital image processor ensure your shooting quality. The exterior design is based on the concept of simplicity and ease of use, with the four corners of the front curved downwards to highlight the sleek and modern body, and the carefully crafted operation buttons on the back are beautiful and functional.

Each has its own characteristics, and the periscope lens was developed to create thinner digital cameras with optical zoom, because the body of a digital camera with a general optical zoom telescopic lens must have enough depth to accommodate the zoom lens assembly, making it difficult to further thin the body. Later, the design of the periscope lens appeared, and the depth required for the zoom lens was changed to vertical or horizontal to achieve the purpose of reducing the thickness of the body. In digital cameras that use periscope lenses, the lens does not protrude outwards when zooming, and the purpose of zoom is achieved by rotating the lens inside.

The periscope lens is characterized by the sharpness of the edge is not much different, so that the delicacy of the picture is well balanced. However, it does not have a good suppression effect on chromatic aberration, the zoom speed is not fast enough, and it is difficult to achieve a wide aperture due to the limitations of the structure.

Telescopic lenses are widely used in high-end and low-end digital cameras, except for fixed focal length lenses, as long as there is a change in focal length, telescopic lenses are very good to complete the zoom task. In card machines, the quality of telescopic lenses is also better, which may also be the reason why manufacturers such as Canon and Casio have insisted on using telescopic lenses so far, while focusing more on minimizing the size and powerful functions of the body.

The advantage of the telescopic lens is that it works very well in the middle of the lens, and although the degree of detail is somewhat reduced at the edges of the frame, it still meets our requirements. Due to the long history of telescopic lenses, the technology has been very mature, guaranteeing the quality of our shots. As for who is better, the periscope lens or the telescopic lens depends on the actual needs of the user.

Although the periscope lens will bring a certain image to the imaging, this can also be trimmed and improved by mature electronic technology and manufacturing technology. The telescopic lens does not have an advantage in controlling the volume of the machine, but its lens manufacturing technology is purely image stable, and Casio has also succeeded in controlling the volume of the telescopic lens card machine in the world's second thinnest position.

Telescopic lenses are better, and opt for optical image stabilization.

Personal suggestions and opinions for your reference: Canon A2000IS, (Canon A2000is has 6x optical zoom), Canon IXUS IS, Sony W130, W150** at about 1300-1400 yuan, is a card machine with a telescopic lens, and the final imaging effect is slightly better than that of a card machine with a periscope lens. Canon A2000IS, Canon IXUS IS, Sony W130, W150 are fully automatic cameras, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, can only be through the camera pre-type various shooting modes to cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, especially in the case of poor light, especially when shooting night scenes, the imaging effect will not be ideal, but the general household is fully competent.

Canon A590IS,**Around 1300 yuan,Better performance,The main advantage is that in addition to the preset multiple shooting modes in the camera,There are more comprehensive manual shooting functions,You can integrate more into the effect you want when shooting,The fun and space for shooting will be greater,Especially when shooting pure night photos,By manually adjusting**、Aperture、ISO and other parameters,The photo picture effect is clear and clean without any noise, It is incomparable to the imaging effect of those fashionable fully automatic card machines that shoot with so-called program mode (commonly known as point-and-shoot mode) cameras such as night mode. Canon's new models such as Canon IXUS and Canon IXUS old models, Sony's new models such as Sony T90, T900, W210, W220, W290 and Sony T series, W series old models, the most important imaging device photoreceptor chip CCD size is almost the same, all about 1 inch, although some have millions of pixels improved, there is no major substantive difference in the actual imaging effect, basically the same type, the same grade vertical envy model, They are all fully automatic cameras, which are new bottles of old wine, without any outstanding clear fiber function, only some more fancy functions that have no impact on improving the imaging effect, because they have just been launched, ** is high, and the current cost performance is low. Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, and the one that suits you is the best.

You can compare each model according to your own price and favorite, check the information on the Internet.