How about the Canon 28 70 F2 8 L constant aperture?

It's this head of more than 6,000 yuan, don't buy second-hand, you don't necessarily see that the lens has fallen, you don't know it after using it, if you don't have money, go buy Sigma or Tamron, less is

I want to buy it to take pictures of scenery and portraits when I travel occasionally! Commemorative etc.! Don't know how?

The most suitable for your needs is the Canon 18 55mm is 6000 yuan, which you also know, and has a wide angle, and the telephoto end is basically the most suitable focal length for shooting portraits. ^_

Yes, since LZ already has an idea, it's good to accept it, and the quality is also passable, and the style is also good-looking.

Look at it, look at it, strike first, remember to give points.

I suggest you buy Canon's Mirror Emperor! The imaging is good.

You might say that there's no wide angle at 40d, and I would say if you're not a professional landscape photographer and you're just taking pictures of everyday landscapes.

I think 36 is enough, 105 is good for macro and portrait, the aperture is still the same, and I upgraded it to full-frame, and I recommend you to use this head, and I also use this lens.

One disadvantage is that the lens sticks out at the 24th end and the lens sticks in at the 70th end... That's the trouble...

Canon did not 28-70

24-70 Horizontal comparisons are average.

It can only be said that it is a good head, after all, the red circle.

Use it on your 40d, depending on what you like to shoot.

First of all, both are Canon's "big ternary" (16-35

and 70-200

For one, the image quality is the best among Canon's zoom heads (of course, it can't be compared to prime lenses), so if you plan to have a persistent fever, you can buy either one and burn the others later.

If this is your first shot, I personally recommend going up to 24-70 first. Because 24mm-70mm is the commonly used standard focal length, it is more convenient to use; And 70mm-200mm is already in the medium telephoto range, unless there is a special need, it is not as convenient as 24-70. Also, the weight of the two lenses is also a factor you need to consider, the 24-70 weighs 950 grams, and the 70-200 weighs almost a kilogram!

Therefore, if it is equipped with 70-200, it is also a test of your arm strength. Finally, 70-200 handheld shooting is easy to blur, either you go on 70-200 with IS (commonly known as XBIS), which can reduce the chance of blurring to a certain extent, or just put it on a tripod to shoot, but this reduces flexibility.

To sum up, if you only choose between these two lenses, it is recommended to go to 24-70 first, and when you feel it, it is not too late to enter 70-200 or other lenses.

In fact, at this price point, the landlord can also consider a combination of 24-105F4+ or the former, the former zoom lens can take into account daily use, and the latter's fixed focus head can ensure the image quality, and the aperture is larger, suitable for portrait shooting.

Depending on what you focus on, focusing on landscape and portrait photography, it is recommended to buy 24-70 first, standard zoom lenses are often used, and 70-200 heads are used first if you focus on sports photography and portrait photography.

If you don't shoot birds and wildlife regularly, the Canon 24-70 is more practical. The Canon 24-70 is basically a wide-angle to mid-focal length zoom lens, which is suitable for most landscape and portrait shots. Theoretically, the larger the zoom factor, the worse the imaging effect.