Let s talk about whether there is a correlation between high education and high quality?

I don't think there is a necessary relevance, because the current schools only teach students knowledge, but do not teach students the principles and qualities of life.

A high degree of education does not necessarily mean a high level of quality! A high degree of education represents a certain level of professional knowledge in a certain industry, but the level of quality (humanistic cultivation) may not necessarily be high, and some of them are not as good as even having a primary school diploma or even not going to school.

Once, when I was on the subway in Shanghai, three migrant workers came up from the platform, wearing hard hats on their heads, and their clothes and shoes were covered with mud. There were a lot of empty seats in the trunk at that time, but as soon as the three of them came up to the door, they put the big package on the ground, and all three of them tacitly sat on their suitcases, and I was still a little puzzled at the time. When they took off their mud-covered shoes together, I suddenly realized that they were afraid that their shoes would dirty the floor.

It was October, and it was a little cold after an autumn rain. Therefore, there is no direct relationship between high quality and academic qualifications.

Personally, I don't think there's a connection. A highly qualified person, regardless of the level of education.

There is a connection, but it is not necessarily, if you say a returnee, you may walk on the street, phew, spit out a mouthful of phlegm, do you say that he has quality or no quality? That's what you can't say.

A high degree can only indicate that you have received many years of education. However, how much a person has learned, what he has learned, and what his ideological and moral qualities have are different from person to person.

An academic qualification is proof of completion of the required courses, and can only prove that such a level of cognitive proficiency has been achieved within a certain period of time. Diathesis is an internal, relatively stable physical and psychological characteristic that exists in the human body. Cognitive ability is only a small part of it.

Well, the cognitive level is an indicator of the level of quality, and at present, education improves quality with the help of knowledge education, and then gives proof of knowledge, that is, academic qualifications. Quality and knowledge do not match exactly, but through knowledge learning can improve quality, that is, develop body and mind. Presumably, people tend to feel that the overall quality of people with higher education is higher than that of people with low education.

A person's quality is related to a person's cultural accomplishment, a person's moral character, a person's life, and a person's experience.

People with high academic qualifications do not necessarily have good character. I have dealt with a lot of highly educated people, and I have seen too many professors and doctors, and I don't think that a high degree is a high quality. Especially when you say quality is referring to moral character.

Moral quality is what everyone has to pursue and practice all their lives, and if you have money or not, you really sometimes have to rely on some external opportunities; But whether or not to be a noble person, a person who can feel comfortable, a person who can walk independently without the help of a wheelchair, is an individual who can decide for himself. As the saying goes, "seeking wealth and nobility lies in heaven, and sanctification and sage lie in oneself."

Personally, I think to learnCalendar and quality are not directly proportional. And the higher the education, the better the quality.

Many people will think that people with higher education will have better qualities. But in real life, this view is wrong. Because many people with relatively high educational qualifications are not as high as the quality of ordinary people. <>

Education and quality are not directly proportional.

Everyone will think that after a person has a relatively high academic qualification, the quality of the person is also directly proportional to the academic qualification. But this is wrong. Although there are many people whose education and quality are basically at the same level.

But because many people have always paid more attention to their academic performance in the process of reading. As a result, they ignore the cultivation of their own quality, resulting in even if they have a relatively high degree of education, they still cannot have a relatively high quality. <>

Higher quality education is not always better.

First of all, most people with higher education may be better than ordinary people in terms of quality. However, there will also be many people who have relatively high academic qualifications, but their qualities are not much different from ordinary people. Even some people who are not highly educated will exceed the qualities possessed by those with higher educational qualifications.

So in general, it is not that the higher the academic qualifications, the better. Because a person's academic qualifications and qualities are evaluated separately. And there is no inextricable relationship between the two.

It is hoped that every person with high education can have a relatively high quality.

Finally, I personally hope that in real life, every person with a relatively high degree of education can make himself have a relatively high quality state. Because only in this way can the people around you feel that they are better. And it will also make the people around you feel that they can improve their personal quality through learning.

Education and quality are not necessarily proportional, the higher the quality of education, the better, this still has to divide people, some people's quality is naturally low.

Not proportional. It is not that the higher the academic qualifications, the better, but some academic qualifications are very low, and they are not as good as ordinary people.

It is not proportional, and there are many people with high academic qualifications who are very poor in quality and will do a lot of bad things.

No, there is a positive correlation between academic qualifications and quality.

I think that education and quality are not proportional, high education does not mean good quality, I think the main thing is to look at the tutor, even if the education is not high-quality, it is also very good.

I've been in this situation before. Academic qualifications are just a stepping stone, and whether you can really become a pillar after entering a good unit depends on the specific ability to practice work and code, and it is not excluded that there are some high scores and low ability. However, the employer has neither the time nor the interest in letting you prove that you are a low-scoring and high-energy person.

And it is precisely for this consideration that many units give preference to people with relatively n backgrounds, saving the trouble of inspection (academic qualifications have been screened for the unit). Otherwise, you go to the employer and say that you are very good, but how can you prove it? In other words, in addition to academic qualifications, if you can have other NB work experience to prove that you are very good, at least let the employer see where you are outstanding.

Personally, I think there may be several reasons:

1. At least prove that you have a certain learning ability. Students who can be admitted to these good schools at least prove that they are very good, and not everyone can get into those good schools. For example, a graduate of Peking Union Medical College and a graduate of a general medical school, who do you think the hospital will want?

This is not to belittle other schools, but to show that people who have the ability to be admitted to these very NB schools must have NB merits.

2. The educational experience is different. Although it is the same medical school, the requirements, teaching, and management of different schools are also different. Relatively speaking, those key colleges and universities are more rigorous in terms of teachers, teaching requirements, and training methods.

For example, the person who gives you lessons and teaches you every day is the author of the textbook or even the master of the profession.

For some people, hooligans are not terrible, but they are afraid that hooligans are cultured, and they may be more ruthless and powerful.

Personally, I think that as a teacher, you must be knowledgeable, and only in this way can you teach students more knowledge in the teaching process, so there is a saying that if you want to give students a bowl of water, the teacher must first have a bucket of water. We say that the high academic qualifications of the teachers represent the knowledge and ability of the teachers to a certain extent. However, it does not mean that a high degree of education will necessarily lead to good teaching, because a high degree of education is not the only decisive condition for good teaching.

The same is true for teachers, some teachers are highly educated, knowledgeable, have strong teaching ability, and outstanding teaching performance, and their academic qualifications and abilities are directly proportional. Some teachers are not, although they are highly educated and knowledgeable, their teaching ability is average, and their teaching performance is mediocre, so their academic qualifications and abilities do not match, that is, the ability of high academic qualifications.

Parents recognize highly educated teachers, which is also the reality of today's society, which is affected by the general climate. Nowadays, it is one of the first choices for staff recruited from all walks of life to look at academic qualifications, just as they look at a person's appearance. Whether it is a government unit, a public institution, or an enterprise unit, one of the important conditions for recruitment is to look at the academic qualifications, which must meet the standards; If you don't meet the criteria, you will definitely not be hired.

Therefore, people nowadays must obtain the highest academic qualifications to make great efforts. A high degree of education not only has face, but also is easy to employ. High education is deeply rooted in the hearts of the people and is well recognized by the society.

A highly educated person must be rich in knowledge, and there is no need to question this; But is a high degree of education and rich knowledge necessarily proportional to the ability to work? It's not that the more knowledgeable a person is, the more capable he is to work. This also varies from person to person, some people's education and ability are completely proportional, and some people's education and ability are not equal.

Don't let preconceived notions lead us into the wrong places of thinking. It is not true that a higher education has a higher level of education than a low education, and that a high degree only proves that an individual's cultural level is higher than that of a low education, and the quality varies from person to person.

The quality is related to the ideological and moral education of the family, some parents have a high degree of education, but when educating their children, they only pay attention to the children's academic performance, hold the concept of high scores that are excellent, let the children focus on the grades, and lack of ideological education, psychological counseling, as a result, the children's grades are very good, but the moral quality is very poor.

Some parents do not have high academic qualifications, but they pay attention to the quality education of their children, so that their children can develop in an all-round way in morality, intelligence, physical fitness, art and labor. Children not only respect teachers, treat others politely, but also have good grades.

High or low education is not the criterion for judging quality, the most important thing is to see whether the person's moral concept formed by family education is good or bad. Some college students are reprimanded because the delivery of the delivery staff is late, and the quality of this kind of person is extremely poor, and they have neither respect for others nor themselves.

People with high and low educational qualifications have high and low quality, and they cannot be generalized; if they are divided by rigidity and unfair, it is more objective to make judgments based on their words and deeds.

Low quality is a sign of low emotional intelligence. College students and highly educated talents can only mean that they can read books and take exams, but it does not mean that they must have high emotional intelligence. So they may have some behaviors that are difficult for normal people to understand. For example, low-quality behaviors such as taking the little yellow car as one's own.

And many students get into college because they study all the time. Parents are willing to do anything for their children in order to be able to support their studies, and there are even cases where the children are too old to dress themselves. So when they do something that is low-quality, it may be unconscious, because maybe they think they should do that, and that is the right thing to do, and that's what I do at home.

So in general, it is inseparable from family education.

This question is not valid by extrapolation, and it should be said that most of the academic qualifications of high quality are good. And a high degree of education has high quality, this is unlikely, a lot of uncivilized things happen to young people, a large part of them are on campus, or highly educated people. In fact, a person's heart has been formed in the junior high school stage, that is, whether a person is good or not, depends on the education from primary school to junior high school, and parents and schools have the obligation to educate.

When you were in junior high school, you were a gangster, and you basically spent your whole life messing around; Those who are more honest in junior high school have basically been more honest in this life, and this is only the majority. There are also those who make changes in high school, and there are also those who change in society, you can find out for yourself, your impression of others in junior high school, basically your impression of him is still like that, and it will not change much. To put it bluntly, quality is self-cultivation, family education, respect for people, and the comprehensive embodiment of the three views.

And teach you how to get along with people? Unlikely. And why are high-quality people basically highly educated, because of high quality, they know what they should do and what they do is the right thing to do since they were young, so most of them study hard, and naturally, it is easy to obtain better academic qualifications.