Are there any debaters? I need to solve my problem urgently

Let me tell you this

First of all, in the preparation stage, we must repeatedly think about all possible ideas, you can group the team of four people in pairs, one side of the positive side and the other side, and then debate with each other, so that you can broaden your thinking, know yourself and know the other, in order to be able to fight a hundred battles

The second is the competition stage, and I personally think that the most important thing is that you must have grace!! Make a good impression on the judges Don't be like a vegetable market aunt quarrelling, no matter how excited the other party is, you must remain calm Don't quarrel directly, your rebuttal must be reasonable, don't mess around The more excited they are, the more calm you must be, and victory will be closer and closer to you

Finally, a few taboo points that must be avoided when competing.

First, don't point the pen at the other party because you may be very nervous during the game, and at the same time you will take the pen to record the other party's views and summarize our views, at this time, you may forget to put the pen down when you stand up excitedly, but if you raise your hand, the likely result is to point at the other party directly with the pen, very disrespectful to the other party, so you must pay attention

Second, try not to stand up at the same time when arguing freely, first use the corner of your eye to look at your teammates when you stand up, if someone stands up, don't get up at the same time, otherwise it will give people a bad feeling of team cooperation and affect the overall score

Third, the distribution of team members, this is the key point: I have suffered losses in the past, and those who speak Mandarin clearly and are better try to be divided into the first and fourth debates, and those who respond faster are in the second and third debates. The first debate strives to be calm (because the opening statement is a debate, the psychological quality must be a little stronger, and the speech must be clear), the second debate momentum should be strong (the second debate is the main attack), the third debate reaction ability must be fast (the third debate is the main defense, so to be able to catch the opponent's sudden various problems, the reaction ability should be the strongest of the four), the fourth debate summary ability should be strong, and the speech should be clear (the four debates are generally divided into two kinds, moving people with emotion and moving with reason, if it is the former, you must have a talent in speech, and you must speak with infectiousness, If it is the latter, you must have strong logical ability, but you must speak clearly).

Finally, I recommend a few classic games.

In 1993, Fudan fought against National Taiwan University (human nature) at the pinnacle

95 or 97 I can't remember clearly, there is Lin Zhengjiang's classics, mainly to study the four debates, and later Huang Zhizhong of Shihin University, the four debates and the second debate have been played, very strong, focusing on studying his four debates (this is the cross-strait college student debate competition, Lin Zhengjiang is the international college debate tournament in front).

Debate topic: Good horses don't eat grass, heroes are judged by success or failure, and whether money is the root of all evil, these are all more classic, Lu Yiming and Yu Lei are all that kind of relatively strong style

That's all I can think of for the time being, typing makes my hands sore

Hope it helps!! Also, I wish you all the best of luck!!

Debate is practiced, basically there is no quick course, there is only talent.

Don't be too anxious about the debate competition, it's not too late to wait for the topic to come out, and too long will be counterproductive.

You decide how many debates you are in first, each debate in the debate competition has its own tactics, and I am better at four debates.

The opening argument of a debate should grasp the center; Second, the argument should be detailed and detailed; 3. Arguments are exemplified but not too many; The summary of the conclusions of the four debates should be magnificent!

Liberal debate is about unity.

We'll talk about the rest of the topics.

A couple goes on a trip and two people have different opinions at the fork in the road, the boy thinks it should go east and the girl thinks it should go west. When the argument dragged on, the two decided to ask the locals about it. An elder looked at the boy and calmly he:

If you want to go back smoothly, head east; If you still want a girlfriend, head west. ”

Of course, this is just a joke, but, in fact, it is true, no one wants a lover who blushes with them all the time, especially when your relationship has reached the critical juncture that you want to separate, the more you try to explain and justify, the more unreasonable it will be.

In the process of quarrelling, there is a saying that explains the principle very well - "There are no good words in a hurry". Intense mood swings often make us too late to think, and we will only argue according to the other person's words and the other person's train of thought. If the other party says something hurtful, we will only return a more hurtful sentence.

As a result, the situation will develop to the point of becoming more and more embarrassing, and the town will be beaten until it finally breaks up.

Sometimes it may be just one party talking at first, but because the listener cannot understand the emotions of the confidant, he may come up with some self-righteous practices to teach the other party how to deal with the problems encountered, so that the confidant's emotional needs are not answered, so the confider thinks that these "right practices" are a kind of accusation. As a result, the confidant's original anger about other things gradually shifts to the listener.

This is the first reaction that emotions bring to us: we habitually vent our anger on the person or thing closest to us.

In the relationship between the sexes, once there is a quarrel, the first thing we think of is definitely not our own fault, but "why the other party treats us like this".

Driven by intense emotions, we will mistakenly root such thoughts further in each other, and from this we will come to a conclusion: I don't want to be with such people! However, it is also a directive from our subconscious mind to protect us.

Summary. One is to change the day, that is, to emphasize that the other party's question has nothing to do with the theme of this debate, and the other is to raise the question that the other party asks is not clear, and to be more detailed and specific, so as to buy more time for yourself and your defense friends to consider the problem.

What to do when you encounter a difficult issue while debating.

The second is to put forward the question of the unclear question to be more detailed and specific, so as to buy more time for oneself and his fellow debaters to hold the issue and consider the issue.

In the debate competition, only the following conditions can be avoided: 1. The question of the opponent's Danhu cannot be reinstated; 2. The problem of the other party's high block is very unfavorable to the party; 3. The other party's question has nothing to do with the debate.

There are several ways to avoid it: 1. As if you didn't hear the other party's question, you directly raised your own question. This evasion can be used, but the traces are too obvious.

2. Use a sentence as a transition. When the judges and the audience focus on this sentence, it is easy to forget that the party has changed the point of viewing. 3. Implicit sarcastic avoidanceWhen the other party's question is not very reasonable, this tactic is more effective.

This kind of envy is only effective in a special context, and it should not be rigid.

Debate skills in the debate competition: 1. The content should break the topic and make sure that the bridge rises early, and highlights their own advantages. has its own routine, and it is tightly debated. 2. The arrangement of the debate is stable and the words are shocking.

Strong ability to grasp the ideas of the debate competition. The second and third debates require on-site adaptability, timely organization of the whole scene and language, and strong ability to grasp the viewpoint; The fourth debate is the key to the successful conclusion of the whole debate competition. It is required to have thoughts, heights, enthusiasm, and be able to emotionally drive the judges and the audience.

3. Pay attention to the overall cooperation on the court, and the victory or loss of the debate competition is not only based on the quality of individual performance, but also a test of the tacit understanding between debaters. 4. Pay attention to the use of body language: There is no absolute right or wrong in the debate competition. The question is whose language is more convincing.

And appropriate and rich body language can increase your persuasiveness.

For example, what they want to argue is a full-term proposition, and you only need to have a counterexample and they won't be valid, and there are many examples of this kind ......First of all, what is happiness? It is easier for them to enter into a circular argument that being rich is happiness, which is not true. What role does money play in the definition of happiness, and whether this role will affect the overall situation after it is removed.

Secondly, what is the concept of money? Is it rich to be rich? Personally, I think this kind of debate rendering is very important.

There is a very nonsense example: the people of North Korea are very happy, but they are a relatively poor country, and many countries in Europe are rich, but the happiness of their citizens is not high. There can also be a value advocacy, happiness and money are not necessarily related, we should be more in pursuit of the meaning of life or something.

The skills of debating are not very simple, the most important thing is to have a clear position and know your own logic and basic points. Teammates understand each other's thoughts and will not tear down the stage.

If you are arguing four times, you have to learn to refute their mistakes first, then reiterate their views, and finally have a sublimation.

I think it's right that people who do big things don't have a small thing, and I think it's an old adage, and I think it's right.

When the phrase "existence is reasonable" came in, there were problems with translation and comprehension. "Reasonable" does not mean "correct", but "has cause and effect, and makes sense". For example, if a person kills someone because his relatives have been bullied, and some people justify his murder by saying that this kind of thing "exists is reasonable", this is nonsense.

The correct understanding is that he killed people for a reason, his relatives were bullied, he had nowhere to redress his grievances, he was resentful, and he went astray, not that he was right to kill people.

The key depends on how you interpret this "reasonable".

If, if rationality is interpreted as having a cause, then everything that exists is reasonable.

If rationality is interpreted as conforming to people's moral and legal norms, then it is not necessarily.

First of all, it will develop and change with time and environment and other cognitive differences, which is the rule, and the existence at a certain time means that it is only valid during this time.

Birthday washing, little fresh meat came back, I knew, my breath was over, and I reviewed the meal card, and the embarrassment was magnified.