Is it appropriate for an elderly person to remarry and live in the woman s house, and the man pays f

Appropriate, I think each bears its own responsibilities, and neither completely relies on each other, they all pay, I think this kind of marriage is still very suitable, there will be no contradictions.

Such a marriage is certainly suitable. Neither husband and wife let the other suffer in this marriage. It is very reasonable for one party to pay for the house and the other to pay for the house.

I don't think it's appropriate. Because living together can be very awkward.

I'm an old man, but I'm not biased towards old men. In general, when an old man remarries, an older man finds a relatively younger, healthy woman as a partner. Men's lifespan is relatively short, and it is generally a remarried woman who takes care of and serves the old man to complete his life journey.

Moreover, the body of an elderly man is not as strong as that of a woman, and the purpose of his remarriage is to find a partner who is more intimate than a nanny. On the other hand, if a man is strong, he will never marry a sick old woman to be his wife.

Besides, the elderly couples who remarry, generally the old man dies first, and when the second husband is sent away, the woman is really old, and it will be difficult for her to find a wife again, it is very desolate to be alone, and if you want to hire a nanny, the cost is very high. In general, it is more reasonable for the man to pay for the living expenses if both parties have a pension in an elderly remarried family and the man's pension is sufficient to cover the living expenses of both of them. As a man, you should be generous.

The key is that the two must treat each other sincerely, and must not have selfish thoughts, as long as one party has selfish intentions, there will be no happiness at all.

Of course, if the woman has a high pension, she should also take the initiative to care for the man. If the woman has no pension or no housing, the man should not only pay for the living expenses, but also think about arranging for the woman's life after she is widowed. This depends on the feelings and dedication of both parties.

Generally, it is agreed upon before marriage according to the specific circumstances. There are very few women who contribute money and effort, and they are quite ushering in a master who is willing to be a mother who pays money? Times are different, and such a situation is impossible.

Of course, it is a bit natural to feminize men's money: marry someone and dress and eat. On the contrary, how inappropriate is it for a man to be suspected of eating soft rice?

However, old couples and old companions, living a peaceful and stable life is more important than anything else, no matter who pays!

All in all, an old man who can't afford all the living expenses of remarriage should not go to his wife; When a lady remarries, she should stay away from an old man who can't afford all the living expenses of the family, because such a person is not trustworthy and cannot provide life security, so it is better to live alone without worrying about saving money.

That is the need to support the family, such a man has his own responsibility, so that the consequences will be better and more pleasant.

It is not necessary for the man to pay for the family, in fact, if both of them have retirement salaries, they can peacefully take out the money and then support the family, so that the division of labor is clear, and there are many fewer contradictions in the future life.

It is not necessary for the man to provide for the family. Both people actually have such responsibilities, after all, two people will live together.

Actually, I don't think the man has to pay for the family. Because marriage is a matter of two people, and after marriage, the property of both husband and wife is joint. So it's okay for two people to bear it together.

It depends on the opinion of both parties, if the man is willing, and it is also reasonable. But I think the best thing is that both parties have to pay for the family, so that everyone can be more harmonious.

A home is made up of two people, and since it is made up of two people, then two people should come together to support the family, not just one person to support the family.

When an elderly person remarries and both men and women have a pension, do they have to let the man pay to support the family?

There will be a lot of unsatisfactory in the remarried family, but many times after a long divorce, you will want to have someone to accompany you, so that your life is no longer so lonely and lonely. Nowadays, the elderly also know how to pursue their own happiness, and it is normal for the elderly to remarry. In the face of the elderly remarrying and separating, the man has a pension, and the woman has land in the countryside, and the man does not need to give the woman alimony.

First, the remarriage of the elderly without common property is incomprehensible to many people, they think that people should provide for the elderly when they are old, and do not toss other things, especially love. However, the marriage of the elderly is actually very simple, and both parties just want to find a partner to accompany them for the rest of their lives. Because the elderly are old, they will no longer work to earn money, and they will not have joint property after marriage.

Second, the combination of family rights and wrongs and multiple remarriage families will always cause a lot of right and wrong, especially the remarried families of the elderly, and the families of both sides will bring a lot of trouble. Since the man has a pension and the woman has land in the countryside, the remarriage branch should return to the original state of being unmarried, which is also relatively normal. The marriage of the elderly, at the end of the year, has no property at all, and everything is on their own.

3. The elderly do not have the ability to support others, and the elderly remarry and separate, and they need to be taken care of by others, and their own ability is insufficient, let alone to give alimony to the woman. Most of the elderly nowadays remarry financially independent and live on fire, not to mention alimony to the woman. We cannot compare how different the marriage of the elderly is from the marriage of the young.

When people are old, although they also have the right to pursue love, if they just want to have a partner, they should not easily choose to remarry at this time. The remarriage of the elderly will bring great trouble to their children and families, so don't try it easily without thinking it through.

It is not legally mandatory, it needs to be discussed by two people, and it is an internal family issue.

Need. Because the woman's financial conditions are not very good, the man should pay a certain amount of alimony.

Yes, and this is also required by law, and then after the divorce of the two people, if the woman has children, the man needs to give the corresponding alimony and financial subsidies.

Summary. Because, when you become husband and wife, you have a husband and wife relationship, and these properties are the joint property of the husband and wife. Both parties work together to strive for the happiness of the couple.

Is it reasonable for a remarried man to ask the woman to pay living expenses, and the two parties will buy a house together and save pension money together.

Dear, please wait a minute.

Dear, that's reasonable.

Because, when you become husband and wife, you have a husband and wife relationship, and these properties are the joint property of the husband and wife. Both parties work together to strive for the happiness of the couple.

However, the man did something bad.

This is because men have to take on the main responsibility for the family, and men are certainly not paid as much as women.

If the two parties divide too clearly, it will damage the relationship between husband and wife.

Hope it helps.

For remarried couples, it is definitely a fate for two people to come together, not for the benefit of the other party. Because once a person reaches the stage of old age, everyone hopes that there is a person who can really accompany them, so even if they live in a nursing home, it is a matter of course for the woman to take the money or not, and there is no need to be too Zen and closed-minded.

1. On the topic of nursing homes

With the continuous development of society, more and more elderly people are willing to live in nursing homes, because now nursing homes can not only provide a living environment, but also meet the needs of the elderly themselves, such as chess and card rooms, dance rooms, painting rooms, chess rooms, massage halls, and conventional pharmacies, so most of the elderly are willing to live in nursing homes when the economy allows. Moreover, the current nursing home implements one room and two households and is equipped with a separate sanitary napkin, which not only improves the living standard of the elderly, but also has the opportunity to make friends.

2. The method of money distribution between husband and wife

For couples with pensions, it will not be difficult to come up with some money to live in a nursing home, because the fees of nursing institutions are very reasonable now, so whoever takes the money can do it, and even two people can live in a nursing home together, so that even if there are concerns in their hearts, they will disappear. The most important thing between husband and wife is not money, but how to improve the way of life between two people, and how to maintain the warmth of the family, so that even if we don't have too much money, we will still live a very happy life.

Everyone's "obligations" will be different, as long as the hearts of two people develop in the same direction, and care more about each other, so that we will not worry about the little things in life. Because many times one person's emotions can easily affect another person, so for the sake of these unnecessary troubles, why don't we think about things simply, and then spend every day happily.

During the period of living in a nursing home, the woman needs to give money to the man, after all, the nursing home asks for money, and the two are also husband and wife.

The woman does not need to give the man pension money. Because the two of you are equal and both of you have a pension, the woman does not need to pay.

Yes, because two people are husband and wife, any problems should be solved together, and there should be no such thing as your money or my money.

Thank you! If, at the time of the divorce, the woman's personal property and the property received at the time of the divorce cannot maintain the basic standard of living in the locality, and the man is able to help the woman, the husband is required to give the woman some living expenses.

About the assumption that it is hard to maintain the basic standard of living of the locality.

In trial practice, the people's courts shall pay attention to considering the actual circumstances of the case, specifically analyzing specific issues, and making determinations as to whether there are hardships in life. The following circumstances can be identified as living difficulties: (1) one party lacks or loses the ability to work, has no income** or has a limited income**, and is unable to maintain the general standard of living in the local area with his personal property and the property he has shared.

2) Due to illness, one party's personal property and shared property are not sufficient to cover his basic medical needs and maintain the general living standard of the local area. (3) One party has no place to live. The dwelling here includes both the house in which the party has the title and the house in which the party rents or has the right to live.

Where one's own personal property or shared property can be rented for residential use, and it is sufficient to maintain the general standard of living in the locality, it shall be judged in light of the specific circumstances, and it is not appropriate to simply find it to be a hardship.

[Legal basis].Article 1090:In the event of a divorce, if one party has difficulties in living, the other party who can afford it shall give appropriate assistance. The specific measures shall be agreed upon by both parties; If the agreement is not reached, the people's court shall make a judgment.