There are chickens or eggs first, chickens or eggs first

That's a good question. My point is that there are chickens before there are eggs. How can you be a woman without your mother?

Fine, as long as it makes sense.

Chicken or egg?

This seems to be everyone's confusion, but we should still make sure that it is the egg that came first. Today's domestic chickens are derived from wild wild chickens, which have been domesticated for at least 4,000 years. Early domestic chickens were drilled out of eggs laid by a single raw chicken.

Many experts believe that the protochicken is a type of pheasant that is the ancestor of the chicken we see today. But there are also those who believe that today's chickens are the product of crossbreeding of different species of chickens. From an evolutionary point of view, there is no question of whether the egg lays the chicken or the chicken lays the egg, because the early members of a species, whether chickens or other organisms, are the descendants of another similar species.

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

Chicken or egg? Aristotle, a scholarly authority active in 3000 B.C., said: "There is an egg without a father and a mother, and the first chicken pops out of the egg".

Chicken or egg?

The chickens came first, and if you can prove that there were eggs first, then I'm wrong.

Whether the chicken came first or the egg came first is an ongoing debate.

Actually, the correct answer is: first the egg, then the chicken.

Because the chicken's genes come from the first egg! This is the result of a study by Professor John Brookfield, a geneticist at the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom.

According to genetics, once an individual animal is born, the genes in its body do not change. Modern biomolecular theories also believe that there is a genetic mutation in the genetic material in the egg before the chicken species can appear. In an interview, Professor Brookfield noted that the answer is the same for any geneticist.

There are two sources of evidence to support this view: first, from an evolutionary point of view, it is clear that the chicken species did not always exist, so there must have been a first chicken; From the point of view of genetic inheritance, the genes present in the egg must be the same as those in the future adult.

Therefore, if we believe that it is the genes of the "first chicken" in the egg that make the adult a chicken, then the first member of the chicken species must be the egg that hatched the chicken.

The first chicken was born from one egg, which just proves that there were many eggs before there were chickens. If we think that the first egg was born from a genetic mutation of some species other than chicken, we are mistaken.

For example, if an egg laid by a kangaroo hatches an ostrich, then the egg is an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg. "By the same token, if the egg hatches out of a chicken, then it must be an egg.

Therefore, it is common sense to have eggs first, then chickens!

So, the next question is, what species and under what circumstances lay the first eggs that will hatch chickens? In fact, this is a more challenging question that needs to be answered at the moment!

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

I've also thought about it. Do you have to answer the question of whether there came first or the eggs that came first? If birds evolved from pterosaurs, did they come first with pterosaurs or with pterosaur eggs? How did dinosaurs come into existence? How do microorganisms evolve into living organisms? How do microorganisms come about?

All are produced due to genetic mutations, and the particular organism you are talking about is all due to a genetic mutation that evolved into another organism. Of course, human genes are acquired at the time of fertilization. As for the chickens, I think it's pretty much the same.

On time, the bird accidentally crossed with other birds, and then had a little baby, which was a chicken that came out of its shell. Eggs first!!

Just look at these two words. Eggs, eggs, of course, are chickens and then eggs, otherwise they will be rewritten by the world as laying hens, isn't it?

First there are eggs: hey there are chickens and then hey eggs.

Are there chickens and eggs first? Laying hens, laying hens.

It is said that the Holy is the chicken in it.

No, you can answer this one.

Don't do it all! It's important to focus on the question first. It's your health preservation, it's real, this has very! Well, some things are waiting for the chickens to go, hey, I asked again, there is no camp to do! People have questions.

The topic is indicative.

Raise.. You have chickens. Eggs have a reason again.

The head thing has to say! The Li is the Li Fu Shengtian, Wan Gang is a chicken thing, and the Jin Ma out of Yadu Xianli Shi Du said that Wan is said.

Gao is a certain and single. When the cell is a source after the step of the feeding, the step of the matter is the sea miscellaneous life of Mr. Ha Neng, is, the egg after the birth and so on only into the ball of the ground object, cut is the miscellaneous chicken is powerful for the single egg single low cell from; There is a strong can.

Able to enter; Come and go and then, there is no change first, and then the thing should come to Mr. Jane has a raw chicken, and then wait for Ha, because, the thing can give birth to the egg and restore Jane? Life is a great progress.

Hello, the question of "chicken or egg" is a question that people have been debating for a long time and have never had a clear answer. In fact, the appearance of eggs was much earlier than the appearance of chickens, because as early as 280 million years ago in the Permian, reptiles appeared, and reptiles (such as crocodiles, dinosaurs, etc.) would lay eggs, and birds appeared in the Jurassic period 180 million years ago, and chickens appeared even later, but the question about "chicken or egg" is actually asked who comes first and who comes first, chicken or egg.

Chickens lay eggs, eggs hatch chickens, if you say that chickens appear first, then "how can no laying hens hatch"? If you say that the eggs appear first, you will encounter the problem of "who lays the eggs without the chicken", which is really confusing.

According to evolutionary point of view, there is no question of who comes first and who comes after chickens and eggs. As a species in the class of birds, chickens are differentiated from primitive birds, and eggs are the fertilized eggs of chickens (referring to eggs that can breed chicks), and in the long process of the formation of chickens, they have always been a bridge connecting the generations in the evolution of "primitive birds-chickens". In the formation process of chickens, there are three factors:

i.e. variation, heredity, natural selection. "Chickens" lay eggs (they can't be called chickens when they were more primitive), and eggs give birth to "chickens", which are not exactly the same between the two generations, and there are always differences in the offspring born to the same parent. A "chicken" can lay many eggs, but not all of them end up as adult chickens.

In the struggle for survival, individuals with favorable mutations get the best chance to preserve themselves, and the advantages and disadvantages are determined by nature, and chickens are formed precisely because nature gradually retains their good running. Variation characteristics such as more ground activities and poor flight ability, and differentiated from primitive birds. Obviously, heredity plays a role in maintaining and consolidating variation, which accumulates through heredity.

After a long-term, generational process of "chicken" to egg and egg to "chicken", under the action of natural selection, the variation of species is accumulated in a directional manner, resulting in the differentiation of species and the formation of new species, and the "chicken" slowly evolves and the egg also evolves.

There are chickens first, because the eggs are in front, and the eggs are in the back.

The Bible says, "First the chicken and then the egg."

Chickens first, where are there eggs without chickens?

Chickens, which should be the case The researchers found that the structure of eggs depends on a protein found in the ovaries of the hens, so the eggs are only present when the hen is in the body. This protein, called ovocledidin-17 (OC-17 for short), is a catalyst that accelerates the development of eggshells, which are essential for protecting the yolk and egg whites, allowing the embryo to fully develop inside.

Scientists at the University of Sheffield and the University of Warwick used a supercomputer to "amplify" the egg-forming process. The supercomputer, called "Hector", was located in Edinburgh. The results showed that without OC-17 protein, the outer part of the egg could not crystallize, forming an eggshell.

This protein converts calcium carbonate into the calcite crystals that make up the eggshell. Calcite crystals are found inside many bones and eggshells, but hens form calcite crystals faster than any species – producing 6 grams of eggshells every 24 hours.

Eggs: Eggs come first with chickens and then with eggs.

Chickens, because it's eggs, chickens are in front.

This is a question of logic, not science.

Logically speaking, this is an "either/or" thinking circle, "either the chicken or the egg" is called "either/or". Just like the Taoist "yin and yang", all things are not "either yin or yang", but yin and yang are harmonized and fused with each other.

Biological evolution does not happen overnight, it is a long process of gradual and gradual change, and chickens do not suddenly change from birds to chickens, and eggs do not suddenly change from bird eggs to eggs.

So to get out of this "either/or" thinking circle, it is necessary to go like this: chickens are not chickens, and eggs are not eggs.

This is from a philosophical point of view of logic. On a side note, scientists at the University of Sheffield and the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom claim to have proven that there is a chicken before an egg.

Ink Fragrance Warrior is hereby presented.

From an evolutionary point of view, chickens and eggs are produced at the same time, because at the time of biological mutation, there is the presence of chickens and the presence of a single being.

KFC 11 yuan burger with chicken and eggs.

The correct answer: If there are chickens, how can you get eggs because there are no chickens?

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

Chinese paleontologists from 100 million years ago"Caged spine"Fossilized embryos have been found to have regular cell migration and recombination during embryonic development, which means that at some point in history, a species that resembles a chicken, but is not a chicken, has produced its first "egg" because of a genetic mutation, and therefore for a single individual chicken, it is a chicken that has an egg and then a chicken.

There is no point in arguing about this issue, not explaining.

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

Personally, I think there was a chicken, because a long time ago, there was no such thing as a chicken, and it evolved from his ancestors, who were viviparous at first, and then slowly became oviparous after evolving into chickens.

Eggs, eggs, of course, are chickens first and then eggs, otherwise why are they called eggs.

This remains an unsolved mystery to this day.

The key to solving the problem lies in how we define "eggs" If we think that "eggs" must be eggs laid by chickens, then it must be the first chicken.

Chicken or egg? Aristotle, a scholarly authority active in 3000 B.C., recognized Hu Xiao as "there is an egg without a father and a mother, and the first chicken pops out of the egg."

There are chickens first, if you are a man, you take off your pants, and the first thing you see is chickens.

Is it the chicken that comes first or the eggs that come first? This is a difficult problem for us to observe. But on the issue of first-come-first-served or first-served, we can make a decision. Farewell.

First, there is a chicken bright silver and a finch feast, is there an egg year teaser first?

The key to solving the problem is how we define the "egg" -- if we think that the "egg" must be the egg laid by the chicken, then it must be the chicken that came first.

Do you think it came first, the chicken or the egg?

From a scientific point of view, we start with the first life on Earth, and the first life on Earth should be infinitely close to the way bacteria or viruses reproduce.