Which is the future direction of human science development, chemistry or physics?

In fact, for us, both chemistry and physics are important for the future of humanity.

The development of science plays a fundamental role in helping people live better and transform the world, so in some senses, physics and chemistry are equally importantOf course, from the perspective of modern science, physics is relatively more focused, so it is precisely because of this that many people are more optimistic about physics, believing that physics is the direction of the development of human science in the future. <>

1. Physics and chemistry are both the study of the properties of matter itself, and it is precisely because of this that both are equally important to human production practices. In fact, it has to be said that people are constantly perceiving the world in their lives, and the materials in this world need to help people understand their inner properties through chemistry and physics, so it is precisely because of this that chemistry and physics enable people to perceive the world and understand the tools of the world's production practices, both of which are indispensable. <>

2. Nowadays, many scientists are more optimistic about physics, and believe that physics can quickly change the development direction of people's future science and technology. In fact, it has to be said that although chemistry and physics are equally important, physics is broader than chemistry, covering a larger area, and the effect is more significant, so in some senses, many scientists speculate that it is not unreasonable, and physics can indeed play a role in understanding the maximum role of resource exploitation in the outside world in the near future. <>

3. At present, physics and chemistry are indispensable, and for the future of human science, they can help people better understand this mysterious universe. In fact, it has to be said that chemistry and physics themselves are closely related, and it is precisely because of this that human science will develop in the future.

At the same time, the two will complement each other, so in some sense, it is precisely because of the special relationship between the two that in the near future, both can help human beings better understand the universe and perceive the world.

In fact, for us, chemistry and physics are equally important, and as tools for human beings to perceive the world, in a sense, they are complementary and indispensable, so it is precisely because of this that they will be equally important in the direction of the development of human science in the future.

Physics is the study of acousto-optic mechanics. Chemistry is the study of the creation of something new. The direction of the future development of human science. It's not just one aspect that requires not only chemistry, but also physics.

Yes, chemistry and physics are actually the same to a large extent, and in many places they are inseparable from each other, and the most common precision components in life can only be produced by his two combinations.

According to the current situation, physics is the direction of the future development of human science. Because there is a great relationship between human science and physics. Science is inseparable from physics.

When the Polish scholar Nicolaus Copernicus was born in 1513, the prevailing view was that the Earth was the center of the universe, that is, geocentrism, and that all galaxies revolved around the Earth. Today, it seems, this is undoubtedly incorrect. But at that time, the people of the church thought that this was correct, and it was not until Copernicus proposed heliocentrism that it helped mankind enter a new page, but he paid the price with his life, and his spirit of exploration was immortalized.

Science encounters bottlenecks at some point, and the first one to break this first bottleneck is the Italian scientist Galileo. Galileo is known as the father of modern science, and it is no exaggeration to say that it was his research that created mechanics, so it can also be said that he is the father of modern mechanics. His ideal experiments paved the way for Newton's first and second laws.

Kepler of the same period was just as good as him, and both made indelible contributions to astronomical navigation.

The theories and research of Galileo and Kepler directly promoted the introduction of the famous Newton's three laws, so Newton said the classic saying: I am just standing on the shoulders of giants. Of course, this is not to deny Newton's achievements, Newton also made great contributions to optics, and his most prominent is mathematics, especially his theory of calculus, which is directly a tool of all sciences.

In the later period, with the slow development, a large number of people developed the physical edifice. Thermodynamics developed statistical theory, electromagnetism and later Maxwell's equations, and it seems that the physical edifice was almost perfect at this point, because the theories of Newton and his predecessors were enough to explain the phenomena encountered by people in the world. Actually, when people think that it is perfect, even if thermolicity has statistical theory, electromagnetism has Maxwell's equations, and even Newton's theory and calculus are based, the real physics race has really begun.

The emergence of Planck, Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger and others, as well as Einstein, ended classical physics since Galileo and opened a new era of physics. This period was an era of a hundred flowers, with special relativity and general relativity establishing a new space-time based on Riemann geometric space, the mass-energy equation providing a theory for the manufacture of atomic bombs, and Schrödinger and others establishing a new field, namely quantum mechanics. At this point, the direction of physics began with Einstein's research on the unified field theory, but Einstein did not study it, perhaps this is the next goal of science.

Here, first of all, the above mentioned is only a part of the great scientists, and there are countless great scientific ancestors who are useless to mention, but it is not that they have not contributed, the development of physical science is the result of countless scientists, and it is the crystallization of human wisdom. Secondly, it is necessary to mention Mr. Yang Zhenning, a physicist in China, whose gauge field theory currently unifies three other forces except gravitational force, that is, including strong force, weak force and electromagnetic force. So far, there is no theory that unifies the four forces that humans recognize.

Although the road of science is very bumpy, I believe that the day when these four forces are unified will be the day to break this bottleneck, the day to open the next new era, and the day when mankind is expected to understand the ultimate mystery of the universe!

I think the future of chemistry is:

1) Green chemistry, i.e. the shift to less polluting chemistry;

2) a shift to less resource-intensive chemistry;

3) Discovery of new and low-cost drugs and new materials.

4) Replace the original polluting and resource-intensive process with a new process.

Biology, the next 10 to 50 years may be promising.

Chemistry can also be more extensive in the next 100 years.

Physics, the next 1000 years will not be outdated.

I think your understanding is wrong. There are indeed a lot of biological problems that you have listed to be solved, but do you consider the difficulty of these problems? There are naturally reasons why these problems have plagued the scientific community for so many years, and who can be sure that someone will be able to solve them in the coming decades?

Physics and chemistry are also important. For example, space technology is the main development at present, and most of the solutions to aviation problems are in physics and chemistry. It mainly depends on what your interests are.

The three themselves are inherently important.

What do you mean by your broad development prospects?

Achievements in physics and mathematics, coupled with the rapid development of computer technology, have provided new fields for the development of physical chemistry. Because it is no longer limited to the analytical solution of equations and the application of numerical methods, solids, elastomers and other non-ideal systems have become the research objects of physical chemistry, adding new theories to the research of materials science and technology, and closer to engineering practice. In the early 70s of the 20th century, I

The theory of dissipative structure proposed by Prigogin et al. has extended the theoretical system of physical chemistry from the traditional equilibrium thermodynamics to the new field of non-equilibrium thermodynamics, and the understanding of the stability of the system far from equilibrium will help people deepen their understanding of many practical processes, including life processes.

In the late 80s, the rise of microscopic microscopy, represented by scanning tunneling microscopy, promoted the development of nanoscience and technology. Nanomaterials not only have a strong application background, but also involve a variety of disciplines and technologies in the synthesis, characterization, function and application research of materials, and have a very close relationship with most of the chemical fields, providing a new research field for the development of modern chemistry. Since the magnitude of the number of particles contained in nanoscale particles is far from that of classical physicochemical systems, the development of physicochemical theories and experimental methods suitable for nanosystems will become another challenging new field in physical chemistry in the 21st century.

Catalysis is one of the permanent topics in chemical research. It is of great significance in the fields of chemical production, energy, agriculture, life science, medicine and other fields, but there are still doubts about the principle of catalysis and the reaction mechanism of most catalytic processes, and it is not possible to design a catalyst with efficient catalytic effect for a special reaction system. The application of combinatorial chemistry methods can accelerate the screening process of effective catalysts and will help accelerate the development of catalysis theory.

Enzyme catalysis and enzyme-like catalysis research is an emerging field in catalytic science and technology, which will promote the interpenetration of structural chemistry, synthetic chemistry, chemical biology and physics, biology and other technical fields, and will greatly improve chemical productivity while promoting the realization of green chemistry goals.

Hello ( I think that the chemistry that has not been ordered is a new reaction and phenomenon, such as the emergence of plastics in the past, such as mobile phones from LCD to OLED. Another is the intersection of disciplines, where new instruments are divided into new reaction phenomena, new reactions and phenomena are upgraded to observe more things.

Since the birth of chemical physics, it has developed extremely rapidly. By 1939, an Introduction to Chemical Physics by Slater was published, and this basic textbook-style work was printed no less than five times that year. In the preface to the book, Slater highlights that chemical physics is an interdisciplinary discipline, saying:

The separation of physics and chemistry can be unfortunate. Chemistry is the science of atoms and the way atoms bind to each other. Physics, on the other hand, deals with the forces between atoms and the large-scale properties of matter produced by these forces.

In the past, because chemistry was a non-mathematical empirical science, and physics was not able to deal with small-scale forces between atoms, the two sciences were far apart.

Subsequently, due to the establishment of traditional mechanics and molecular theory, and the further development of physical chemistry, the two sciences began to come together. Soon after, quantum theory and wave dynamics were born, which successfully explained the interactions between atoms, and there was no way to continue separating chemistry and physics. However, chemistry and physics are still very different experimentally and methodologically

Chemists are accustomed to handling reactants in test tubes (e.g., preparation of solutions, precipitation, filtration, evaporation, etc.); Physicists, on the other hand, measure any physical quantity with galvanometers and beamsplitters. But as more and more physical instruments enter the chemistry lab, their distinction in this area alone disappears. ......The two sciences have a broad field of study in common.

I hope you can understand this as soon as possible. Since the term physical chemistry has been occupied for a long time, and no better term can be found, this common field of study is called "chemical physics". ...This book is an attempt to introduce some of the contents in this field.

After stating that the Introduction to Chemical Physics should achieve its intended purpose of filling the gap between chemistry and physics, Slater also emphasized the importance of interdisciplinarity in the cultivation of scientific talents, saying: "The gap between chemistry and physics is mainly due to the results of traditional training, and as a result, they are hardly really competent in any branch of chemical physics." If we train the next generation of scientific talents, we must first train them in empirical chemistry, physical chemistry, metallurgy, and crystal structure; secondly, he was trained in theoretical physics, including mechanics and electromagnetic theory, especially in quantum theory, wave dynamics, atomic and molecular structure; Eventually, if they are trained in heat index mechanics, statistical mechanics, and what we call chemical physics, they will become better scientists than those who are now trained only in chemistry, or only in physics.

By the way, Slater has played a good role in promoting the theoretical foundation research and education of materials science in the United States. I think this is not unrelated to his above-mentioned observations. Because chemical physics and materials science are closely related.