Isn t it necessarily beneficial to open the book and have a high hope of winning?

I have information: people who can read all the books are afraid that they can't do anything. This famous saying is that a person who reads everything can do anything. Then, if that person reads a bad book and enjoys it, he may behave badly.

Bishgatyu in Gogol's "Dead Ghosts", who reads everything, is not a well-educated man, but a fool who lacks connoisseurship; Zhu Zeman in "Zhuangzi Lie's Imperial Crown", he learned a special dragon killing technique, in fact, there is no place to kill dragons, he realized that there is no dragon in the world, and his skills are also learned. In this way, if you open the book indiscriminately, you will always get twice the result with half the effort, and the harm will be more and less!

Writer Zhao Shuli said: "Reading is like mining a mine."

Eating pears is harmful to the heart and spleen; Red dates are harmful to your teeth; The medicine is good for the body, but it also has side effects.

The British writer Fielding said: "A bad book is like a bad friend, and it may kill you." If you have a one-sided understanding of "open books are beneficial" and let all books be read, without choosing or asking about the content, it will be beneficial to read it, which is actually not true!

We must learn a skill, and choose the most valuable and perceptual good books that are suitable for us to read.

So, I want you to remember that opening a book is not necessarily beneficial, because no one is perfect. No book is entirely correct.

Liu Xiang of the Han Dynasty once said: "Books are like medicine, and good reading can cure foolishness." "Since books are medicines, they have two functions:

One is good medicine, medicine to get rid of the disease; One is poison, which kills people. Isn't it? In Germany in the 20s, many people were considered Hitler's martyrs because they watched Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and were badly influenced by it.

A bad book is like a bad friend, it can kill you." It's not false at all, now some students are obsessed with martial arts or romance**, reading those grotesque books all day long, and "throwing" their homework aside, resulting in a decline in academic performance, and finally creating a bamboo basket to draw water. Think about it, can it be said that "opening" such a book "volume" is "beneficial"?

A good book is better than a treasure, and a bad book is worse than a robber. Therefore, whether it is beneficial to open the book depends on what kind of book is opened.

A philosopher once said that people who are able to consume the necessary nutrients are healthier than those who eat a lot. At the same time, true scholars are often not people who read books, but people who can read. Some people don't think seriously when they read books, they just flip through the pages casually, some people read books that are not suitable for them, and some people even read books with a curious attitude.

Of course, I am also the party that may not be beneficial to open the book! I have faith in myself, good luck to you! Hee-hee!

Definitely, I'm also on the other side.

Unbook is not necessarily beneficial.

One morning a few weeks ago, our class had a discussion meeting, and the positive view was: open books are beneficial; The opposing view is that opening the book is not necessarily beneficial.

I am the opposite, first of all, I understand that "opening the book is not necessarily beneficial": the opening of the book is not necessarily beneficial, and the first is that the opening of the book is not necessarily beneficial; On the other hand, it is not necessarily beneficial to open the book.

It is often said, "It is good to open a book, but it is good to read a book." However, on closer examination, this statement is not entirely true. If we are interested in every book, then "open books are beneficial" is not necessarily beneficial.

Today's classmates may like to read martial arts, romance only **, books and periodicals, sometimes to the extent of forgetting to sleep and eating, and not letting go of the book, once they are lost in books, they will go crazy, then they only think about books in class, and they don't have the heart to study, and their grades will plummet. There are also people who are attracted by some of the plots in the book, imitate the characters in the book, and sometimes go down the path of crime. Isn't this a harm to yourself by reading books?

This is just the first layer included in "unbook is not necessarily beneficial": unbook is not necessarily beneficial. There is also a second floor.

The second is that we have to be selective when we read books. Don't read books that aren't healthy and don't help us much. If we want to read books, we should read some books that are conducive to our physical and mental health, and helpful to our study and life.

Such a book is a good book, and only by reading a good book will you not ruin yourself. Some people compare books to friends, reading good books, that is, making good friends, will progress; If you don't read a good book, of course, you will make friends with people who can't make friends, and then you will regress. Because those who are close to Zhu are red, and those who are close to ink are black!

So, only good books will be good for you. Therefore, my point is that open books are not necessarily beneficial.

I sincerely hope that every student can choose to read. And don't ruin your life by reading the wrong book, leading yourself astray.

Reading is beneficial, it enriches our knowledge!

It is possible to write beautiful essays!!

Of course, opening the book may not be beneficial. Reading those unhealthy books will affect people's values and outlook on life, and it is a person who is depraved and addicted.

In the exam, students will look up books or various materials by themselves, so that they will have a process of memorizing some.

But if you don't have an open-book exam, then it will be regarded as a real exam, and the students who can't do it won't do it, and they will finish it, and they care about the score, so when the teacher doesn't go back to listen to it in the process of speaking, those who can't will not do it at all, and those who can show off their scores with the people next to them.

So depending on the situation, it is still beneficial to open the book.

I don't think an open book is necessarily beneficial!

It is a good medicine that can cure diseases; It is poison that can kill. The first category refers to good books, and the second category refers to bad books. When people read bad books, it's like eating poison and ruining your future.

So how can you say that opening the book is beneficial?

Also, if a person reads a bad book, it is like making a bad friend, and your own future will be buried, and now there are many children doing illegal things outside, and they have not read bad books when they were teenagers, and many of the books now are unhealthy books, how can you ensure that today's teenagers do not read these books?