As a fan, if your idol participated in a plagiarized work, would you abandon the show?

The previously popular fantasy love costume drama "Three Lives, Three Worlds, Ten Miles of Peach Blossoms", both the lineup and the plot can be described as amazing, but unfortunately, later the ** of this drama was exposed to plagiarism, and the author of this book, Tang Qigongzi, was also questioned about his character, and several works were exposed to suspected plagiarism, so, as a fan, if your idol participated in the plagiarized work, would you abandon the drama? Will you give up the drama played by idols in order to protect the copyright?

As far as I'm concerned, I won'tBecause I think this drama took a lot of time to shoot after all, spent a lot of energy and price, and there are so many people's efforts, if you don't watch him plagiarize, this drama is still a good drama, so I'm still willing to watch it, but this is really unfair to the author who was plagiarized, so my approach may be not to watch the plagiarized **, but since it has been made into a drama, the wood has been completed, I will choose to watch this drama, after all, when this drama is filmed, whether it is the director, The producers or actors don't know that this is a plagiarized work, and they are also innocent, so I don't think they should bear the loss, and they shouldn't be responsible for the blame for plagiarizing the author, how innocent they are!

I think there are many ways to maintain copyright, our idols have made a lot of efforts for a drama, as fans, we should not live up to their efforts, we should actively support them, but this is not blind, we should see his progress, point out his shortcomings, and urge him to continue to move forward, this is what a fan should do. As for the copyright issue, I think the most important thing to pursue is the plagiarized author, and he should be held responsible for all the losses.

I think I will, as a fan, what I value more is his character. If I plagiarize the work, I will abandon the show as soon as possible.

I won't, but if the script plagiarism is particularly bad, then I will definitely abandon the show.

If my idol participates in a plagiarized work, then I will still resist it, after all, plagiarism is shameful.

Yes, plagiarizing works is the director's business, not my idol's business, why don't I watch it? It has nothing to do with my idol.

I think in this case, our fans will also treat it sensibly, and will actively ask idols not to play this kind of drama.

As a fan, my idol was involved in plagiarized works, and I will watch it too, after all, I am a fan of him.

I won't, I don't think it's a normal thing, and he's not a director.

It depends on the situation, this has something to do with the crew, and it has nothing to do with the star himself.

After we find that our work has been plagiarized and infringed, we can protect our legitimate rights and interests through the following methods.

After the work is plagiarized and infringed, we can find the plagiarist and negotiate privately, whether to ask the plagiarist to remove the infringing content from the shelves or give a license fee to use it legally. If the negotiation fails, you need to protect your rights in the following three ways.

2. Feedback infringing materials and information through the platform to protect rights (mainly through negotiation, suitable for situations without too much interest disputes).

or provide proof of original works + collected evidence of infringement, and give feedback to the platform on the infringing works, and now most platforms are gradually improving the protection of originality, and basically will deal with it in a timely manner.

3. File a lawsuit and protect your rights and interests through the judiciary (it is best to find a ** agency).

This is the ultimate means to solve the dilemma, if the above two ways can not be solved, you can pick up the law to protect your own interests. It should be noted that the most important thing in filing a lawsuit to protect rights is the improvement of the evidence chain (the collection of evidence requires a third-party certification agency to be effective), so it will be more troublesome and take a long time.

4. Connect with the third-party rights protection platform and protect your own rights.

Now there are many first-class rights protection platforms on the Internet, such as Zhizhou Yunzheng, and you can find a reliable platform for carte bligna. A professional rights protection platform will definitely have a higher success rate in handling infringement incidents than itself.

First of all, I don't really support my idol acting in a plagiarized drama, because it is very likely to put myself in it. **It's not adapted into a TV series, it's easy to say anything, plagiarism is plagiarism. Once it is made into a TV series, it will definitely cause a big sensation when it involves big interests issues.

Many people will grasp the fact that the script of the TV series is plagiarized and keep saying that it may even cause the audience to target the actors in the play, so I don't recommend my idol to make such a drama.

I usually don't watch these dramas, to be honest, I have read most of the original works, and the characters in my heart are actually a little different from the actors' performances, just like "Splendid Weiyang", I really like Tang Yan and Luo Jin, although this ** is plagiarized, I still like it, but the performance is still different from what I imagined, or almost hot! So I have almost never watched these TV series adaptations, the only thing I have watched is "Mischievous Kiss", if the adaptation can be made like this, then I will definitely watch it.

But I don't watch it, and it's another thing for idols to make plagiarism dramas. If the idols really act very well, it arouses the desire to watch it, but if it's a plagiarized drama, I won't watch it, I think this is at least a respect for the original author, if everyone goes to support the plagiarism drama, won't it be messy? All the authors don't write well, they just plagiarize.

So even if it's filmed by idols, I won't watch it if it's a plagiarized drama. Of course, I especially hope that idols can read the script well, investigate it well, and don't make this kind of plagiarism drama! <>

I won't read it.,Although I like my idols.,But plagiarism.,This is the bottom line.,Although I can't stop anything, I also want to do my best to resist.。

The artist's fault.

For the frequent plagiarism incidents in the music world, it is necessary to distinguish whether the creator actively plagiarizes or passively plagiarizes, the former is excusable, and the latter should be severely condemned. **The creator's brain will have a lot of melodies that will emerge unconsciously, and sometimes they will think that it is a melody created by themselves, which is passive plagiarism, an unintentional thing, and active plagiarism is malicious plagiarism, and the melody and lyrics are similar. The most important thing is that the audience can't tell whether the author is malicious plagiarism or passive plagiarism.

From plagiarism to originality is actually a process, we must learn to change, have the courage to break the status quo, we must learn to think innovatively, and integrate our own ideas or experiences into creation.

There are policies and countermeasures, since you can't plagiarize, then I can change the word or sentence to express the same meaning? This is pseudo-originality. Originality is the core requirement of innovation and a kind of academic integrity.

From writing diaries and essays in elementary school, and then to journals**, people have been dealing with writing all their lives, and they will have the experience of plagiarism more or less.

To define whether a work is plagiarism, it is generally defined by "contact + substantial similarity".

"Contact" is also divided into two situations, one is that if the first work has been widely disseminated, if there is another song that is similar, then it can be identified as plagiarism; Another situation is that the ** work itself has not been publicly published, but if the ** work has participated in the competition, then the judges and the audience will be deemed to have been in contact with the ** work.

Substantial similarity is relatively easy to understand, that is, a large number of similarities in the melody between ** works, if the similar melodic fragments are determined to be original, then it can be identified as plagiarism.

In addition, substantial similarity should also be judged according to the entire ** work, which can be judged as plagiarism by 8 bar similarities, or that the main chord and genus chord in the ** accompaniment are too similar in proportion, and it can also be judged as plagiarism.

First of all, I think it's the mistake of the person who plagiarized, because artists can be seen to be talented people on the surface, and these artists will think of a lot of works, publish them, and then they will be plagiarized by others.

The entertainment industry is changing too fast, and most of it is a fast food culture formed to please fans and the market.

Since it is fast food, it is required to be produced quickly, and high-quality original works need to be created and repeatedly revised and polished after a long time, which obviously cannot meet the speed requirements of rapid production and use. Therefore, plagiarism can only be used to achieve the purpose of quickly producing works, so as to use the compression of creative time to quickly produce benefits.

Since it's fast food, don't get your hopes up too much when it comes to nutrition. Under normal circumstances, it is to follow the trend of plagiarism, that is, to copy whatever is popular at the moment, so as to avoid the risks brought by testing the market, and take advantage of the current popularity as soon as possible to realize it in the shortest possible time. In this case, shoddy production is certainly unavoidable.

Since it is fast food, the taste is relatively simple, the fans have eaten enough, and the market is saturated. Then change to a popular flavor and continue to plagiarize.

The cycle will only disrupt the balance of the entertainment market and enter a chaotic circle.

The end of the "Gao Jin Evidence of Plagiarism" incident: Why is the plagiarism phenomenon in the music world getting more and more serious?

Well, I have it, you can click on my avatar ......

There are not a few such plagiarists, I know that there are: Guo Jingming, Yu Zheng, Liuyu Zi, etc. They are in a good situation now, although they have been condemned and complained by netizens, they still have topics and traffic. It's very puzzling.

Plagiarism coffee must have Wilber Pan. His songs are all plagiarized Korean songs. And I didn't even change the melody, and I said that I created it myself every time, which is really speechless. He is developing well now, and he often goes on variety shows to make money.

Speaking of plagiarism in the entertainment industry, I have to talk about Yu Zheng, Guo Jingming and the directors of the love apartment Wei Zheng and Wang Yuan, Yu Zheng has now established his own company to train new actors, Guo Jingming is now mainly ridiculed by the public, but he is also constantly making movies, Wei Zheng and Wang Yuan have not moved since the end of the love apartment.

No matter in that circle, there have been more and more plagiarism incidents in recent years, but the entertainment industry is under the nose of the public, so it is difficult for plagiarism incidents to escape the eyes of the public. However, the more frequent outbreaks of plagiarism also reflect a lot of problems.

On the one hand, the public's ability to distinguish and tolerate plagiarism has increased. From Zhai Tianlin's ** plagiarism to many singers copying the songs of foreign singers, almost all of them were discovered and disclosed by netizens first. And many netizens also used a more easy-to-understand way to present it, so that the public can understand what is the most plagiarized and super degree.

This also reflects from the side that the public has more contact with things, and they also have the ability to discern. Netizens' supervision of works in the entertainment industry is a good way to promote their self-improvement and avoid plagiarism.

After all, as the public's legal awareness continues to increase, the tolerance for plagiarism is getting lower and lower. Zhai Tianlin has not been able to make a comeback, Guo Jingming** plagiarized, He Meiyan did not apologize for plagiarism, and the barrage was full of scolding her when the show was broadcast, which shows that although the memory of the Internet is very short, the public's memory of plagiarism is very deep.

On the other hand, the frequent outbreak of plagiarism incidents also reflects the vigorous development of the entertainment industry, and the growing market demand is not uncommon for creators to use this method to make profits. After all, what broke out is only partial, those who don't have **, and how much plagiarism there are hidden in the dark, no one can say.

Of course, this plagiarism is not to be forgiven. Some creators who know the harm of plagiarism and still plagiarize, it is simply because the cost of plagiarism is much lower than the benefits of risky plagiarism. Because if you want to effectively reduce plagiarism in the entertainment industry and even any other circle, you should increase the punishment for plagiarism.

At the same time, artists and scholars who have plagiarism should be recorded in the archives, after all, every adult should pay the price for his wrong behavior.

The frequent exposure of plagiarism in the entertainment industry is actually very hateful, because intellectual property rights are to be protected.

Good works will definitely be plagiarized by everyone, but this situation should indeed be punished accordingly, and the theft of other people's works must be morally condemned.

I think the plagiarism in the entertainment industry is very serious, which means that the supervision in many places in the entertainment industry is not strict

I think this is a very bad phenomenon, and it is gradually developing into a decadent path, which is not only a cultural crushing but also a moral problem.